Skip to main content
Log in

Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) have become an important technique for monitoring spinal cord function intra-operatively, but can fail in some patients. A new technique of double-train stimulation is described. A multipulse transcranial electrical stimulus is preceded by a preconditioning pulse train that leads to larger MEP responses. An MEP monitoring system was adapted for double-train transcranial stimulation (DTS). MEP responses from 160 anterior tibial muscles obtained by double-train stimulation were analysed. All patients received propofol/remifentanil/O2/N2O anaesthesia. Fifty-two (83%) out of 63 single-train tibial MEPs with response amplitudes below 100 μV were magnified to over 100 μV, with an inter-train (inter-stimulus) interval ITI=10–35 ms. These 63 amplitudes were magnified by an overall logarithmic mean factor of 15.5. For 97 MEPs with amplitudes above 100 μV, the logarithmic mean facilitation factor was 2.4. It was concluded that double-train TES stimulation can markedly facilitate responses to a single stimulus train (STS). The facilitation appears to be most effective when the responses to STS would otherwise be small or absent. This preconditioning stimulation technique is therefore useful when an STS leads to responses that are too small for effective monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berardelli, A., Rona, S., Inghilleri, M., andManfredi, M. (1996): ‘Cortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease. A study with paired magnetic stimulation’,Brain,119, pp. 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D., Bartley, K., Woodforth, I. J., Yakoubi, A., andStephen, J. P. (2000): ‘The effects of a volatile anaesthetic on the excitability of human corticospinal axons’,Brain,123, pp. 992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calancie, B., Harris, W., Brindle, G. F., Green, B. A., andLandy, H. J. (2001), ‘Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction’,J. Neurosurg.,95, pp. 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruccu, G., Inghilleri, M., Berardelli, A., Romaniello, A., andManfredi, M. (1997): ‘Cortical mechanisms mediating the inhibitory period after magnetic stimulation of the facial motor area’,Muscle Nerve,20, pp. 418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curra, A., Modugno, N., Inghilleri, M., Manfredi, M., Hallett, M., andBerardelli, A. (2002): ‘Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation’,Neurology,59, pp. 1851–1859

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, P., Kalkman, C. J., De Mol, B. A., Ubags, L. H., Veldman, D. J., andJacobs, M. J. (1997): ‘Efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked myogenic potentials to detect spinal cord ischemia during operations for thoracoabdominal aneurysms’,J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 113, pp. 87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Deletis, V., Isgum, V., andAmassian, V. E. (2001): ‘Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli’,Clin. Neurophysiol.,112, pp. 438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferbert, A., Priori, A., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Colebatch, J. G., andMarsden, C. D. (1992): ‘Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex’,J. Physiol,453, pp. 525–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. J., Harrison, R., Koh, K. F., Mendoza, N., andCrockard, H. A. (1996): ‘Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: Responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains’,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.,100, pp. 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkman, C. J., Ubags, L. H., Been, H. D., Swaan, A., andDrummond, J. C. (1995): ‘Improved amplitude of myogenic motor evoked responses after paired transcranial electrical stimulation during sufentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia’,Anesthesiology,83, pp. 270–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothbauer, K., Deletis, V., andEpstein, F. J. (1997): ‘Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: An essential adjunct [see comments]’,Pediatr. Neurosurg.,26, pp. 247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujirai, T., Caramia, M. D., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Thompson, P. D., Ferbert, A., Wroe, S., Asselman, P., andMarsden, C. D. (1993): ‘Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex’,J. Physiol,471, pp. 501–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeloo, D. D., Journee, H. L., Polak, B., andDe Kleuver, M. (2001): ‘A new application of tce-mep: Spinal cord monitoring in patients with severe neuromuscular weakness undergoing corrective spine surgery’,J. Spinal Disord.,14, pp. 445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodi, Z., Deletis, V., Morota, N., andVodusek, D. B. (1996): ‘Motor evoked potentials during brain surgery’,Pflugers Arch.,431, pp. R291-R292

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, J., Burke, D., Hicks, R., Stephen, J., Woodforth, I., andCrawford, M. (1994): ‘Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: Further evidence for the site of activation’,J. Physiol. Lond.,481, pp. 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, A., andGeorgesco, M. (1996): ‘Interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition studied in man with double magnetic stimulation’,Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol.,101, pp. 395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, A., andGeorgesco, M. (1999): ‘Evoked motor potentials obtained with double magnetic cortical stimulation: Techniques and interpretation’,Neurophysiol. Clin.,29, pp. 235–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, M., Biesecker, J. C., Schulze-Bonhage, A., andFerbert, A. (1997): ‘Transcranial magnetic double stimulation: Influence of the intensity of the conditioning stimulus’,Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol.,105, pp. 462–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubags, L. H., Kalkman, C. J., andBeen, H. D. (1998): ‘Influence of isoflurane on myogenic motor evoked potentials to single and multiple transcranial stimuli during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia’,Neurosurgery,43, pp. 90–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. L. Journée.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Journée, H.L., Polak, H.E., de Kleuver, M. et al. Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 110–113 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351019

Keywords

Navigation