Skip to main content
Log in

Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The discovery of a cadre of breast cancer susceptibility genes has resulted in an increase in the number of women seeking information about prophylactic breast surgery, but virtually no large-scale prospective databases exist to assist women considering prophylactic mastectomy.

Methods: The authors constructed a National Prophylactic Mastectomy Registry comprised of a volunteer population of 817 women from 43 states who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy.

Results: In the registry, 370 women had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Twenty-one (5%) women expressed regrets about the procedure. The median follow-up was 14.6 years (mean 14.8 years; range 0.2–51 years). Those with regrets were subsetted into those with major (n=10) or minor (n=7) regrets. Regrets were more common in those women with whom discussion about prophylactic mastectomy was initiated by a physician (19/255), compared with patients who initiated the discussion themselves (2/108;P<.05).

Conclusions: The overall satisfaction rate of 95% reported here may be explained by the voluntary nature of this registry. The most important factor that predicts an unfavorable outcome following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a physician-initiated discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT, Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers.Am J Hum Genet 1995;56:265–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford D, Easton DF, Peto J. Estimates of the gene frequency of BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer incidence.Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:1457–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE. Risk of cancer in BRCA-1 mutation carriers.Lancet 1994;343:692–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.N Engl J Med 1997;336:1401–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whittemore AS, Gong G, Itnyre J. Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three US population based case control studies of ovarian cancer.Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:496–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenwald P, Nasca PC, Lawrence CE. Estimated effect of breast self examination and routine physician examinations on breast cancer mortality.N Engl J Med 1978;299:271–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.JAMA 1995;273:149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourne TH, Whitehead MI, Campbell S, Royston P, Bhan V, Collins WP. Ultrasound screening for familial ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol 1991;43:92–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerman C, Narod SA, Schulman K. BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: a prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.JAMA 1996;275:1885–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoskins KF, Stopfer JE, Calzone KA. Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer: a guide for clinicians.JAMA 1995;273:577–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross TP, Schlesselman JJ. The estimated effect of oral contraceptive use on the cumulative risk of ephithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:419–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosary CL, Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Harras A, Edwards BK, eds.SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1992: Tables and Graphs. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1995 (NIH publication no. 96-2789).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borgen, P.I., Hill, A.D.K., Tran, K.N. et al. Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 5, 603–606 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303829

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303829

Key Words

Navigation