Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of correlates of change is the investigation of systematic individual differences in growth. Our representation of systematic individual differences in growth is built up in two parts: (a) a model for individual growth and, (b) a model for the dependence of parameters in the individual growth models on individual characteristics. First, explicit representations of correlates of change are constructed for various models of individual growth. Second, for the special case of initial status as a correlate of change, properties of collections of growth curves provide new results on the relation between change and initial status. Third, the shortcomings of previous approaches to the assessment of correlates of change are demonstrated. In particular, correlations of residual change measures with exogenous individual characteristics are shown to be poor indicators of systematic individual differences in growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (1939). The limitations of infant and preschool tests in the measurement of intelligence.Journal of Psychology, 8, 351–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W. (1960). Some stochastic process models for intelligence test scores. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1949). Consistency and variability in the growth of intelligence from birth to eighteen years.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1956). Individual patterns of development.Child Development, 27, 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1968). Behavioral correlates of mental growth: Birth to thirty-six years.American Psychologist, 23, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1976). Impediments to the study of teacher effectiveness.Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, N. (1977). On the relation between change and initial value.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 746–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1964).Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1969). Observations on the measurement of change. In E. F. Borgatta (Ed.),Sociological methodology 1969. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borich, G. D. (1979). Implications for developing teacher competencies from process-product research.Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S. (1977). An investigation of the effectiveness of alternative adjustment strategies in the analysis of quasi-experimental growth data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Weisberg, H. I. (1977). Use of the nonequivalent control group design when subjects are growing.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 950–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. E. (1981). Statistical procedures with the law of initial values.Journal of Psychology, 108, 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1968). The mathematical study of change. In H. M. Blalock & A. B. Blalock (Eds.),Methodology in social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change”—or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977).Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, N. E. (1966). Fitting curves to longitudinal data.Biometrics, 22, 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, P. R. (1967). Models of the second kind in regression analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 29, 266–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L. (1973). Interpreting regression toward the mean in developmental research.Developmental Psychology, 8, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garside, R. F. (1956). The regression of gains upon initial scores.Psychometrika, 21, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1979).The design and analysis of longitudinal studies. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guire, K. E., & Kowalski, C. J. (1979). Mathematical description and representation of developmental change functions on the intra- and inter-individual levels. In J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (Eds.),Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, H. (1934). A rational equation of the learning curve based on Thorndike's law of effect.Journal of General Psychology, 11, 395–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, R., & Guttman, L. (1965). A new approach to the analysis of growth patterns: The simplex structure of intercorrelations of measurements.Growth, 29, 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnquist, K. (1968). Relative changes in intelligence from 13 to 18.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 50–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M. J. R., & Goldstein, H. (1978). Regression to the mean.Annals of Human Biology, 5, 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicklin, W. J. (1976). A model for mastery learning based on dynamic equilibrium theory.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1951). Methods and procedures in the study of learning. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, S. L., & Berger, J. O. (1983). Empirical Bayes estimation of rates in longitudinal studies.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 753–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1943).Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. (1960). Investigations of the simplex.Psychometrika, 25, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). Estimation and testing of simplex models.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. A. (1983). Ability measures and theories of cognitive development. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.),Principles of modern psychological measurement: A festschrift for Frederick M. Lord. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C. (1977). The use of change scores as criteria in longitudinal survey research.Quality and Quantity, 11, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & Greenberg, D. F. (1981),Linear panel analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I. (1956). The evaluation of automatic responses: Toward a general solution.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 67, 123–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. (1962). The law of initial value in the longitudinal study of autonomic constitution: Reproducibility of autonomic responses and response patterns over a four year interval. In W. M. Wolf (Ed.), Rythmic functions in the living system.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1257–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1960).Quantitative methods in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., & Slinde, J. A. (1977). The determination of the significance of change between pre- and posttesting periods.Review of Educational Research, 47, 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1958). Further problems in the measurement of growth.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1963). Elementary models for measuring change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B., Appelbaum, M. I., & Hogarty, P. S. (1973). Developmental changes in mental performance.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (No. 150).

  • Medley, D. M. (1979). The effectiveness of teachers. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Research on teaching: Concepts, findings and interpretations. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1981). Denoting the base-free measure of change.Psychometrika, 46, 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesselroade, J. R., Stigler, S. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1980). Regression toward the mean and the study of change.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 622–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, F., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1981). Substantive interpretations of differential equation models.American Sociological Review, 46, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, E. F. (1972). Extending classical test theory to the measurement of change.Review of Educational Research, 42, 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, P. F. W. (1982). The fan-spread hypothesis and the adjustment for initial differences between groups in uncontrolled studies.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 759–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves.Biometrics, 14, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1965). The theory of least squares when the parameters are stochastic and its application to the analysis of growth curves.Biometrics, 52, 447–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A. H., & Palmer, F. H. (1970). Factors related to change in mental test performance.Developmental Psychology Monographs, 3 (Part 2).

  • Richards, F. J. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use.Journal of Experimental Botany, 10, 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, M. (1941). A statistical study of the development of intelligence test performance.Journal of Psychology, 11, 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 90, 726–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv, A. (1979). General growth model for evaluation of an individual's progress in learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 866–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salemi, M. K., & Tauchen, G. E. (1982). Estimation of nonlinear learning models.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 725–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandland, R. L., & McGilchrist, C. A. (1979). Stochastic growth curve analysis.Biometrics, 35, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, D. G. (1975). Several approaches for measuring average rates of change for a second degree polynomial.The American Statistician, 29, 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soar, R. S. (1977). An integration of findings from four studies of teacher effectiveness. In G. D. Borich (Ed.),The appraisal of teaching: Concepts and process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soar, R. S. (1979). Teacher behavior related to pupil growth. In N. Bennett & D. McNamara (Eds.),Focus on teaching. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, D. (1976). A statistical model for the measurement of change. In D. N. M. de Gruijter & L. J. T. van der Kamp (Eds.),Advances in psychological and educational measurement. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, A. B., & Hallinan, M. T. (1977). A reconceptualization of school effects.Sociology of Education, 50, 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1961). Learning parameters, aptitudes and achievements.Psychometric Monograph, (No. 9).

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1971).Statistical inference in a random coefficient regression model. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1974). Linear models with random coefficients. In P. Zarembka (Ed.),Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. (1924). A formula to correct for the effect of errors of measurement on the correlation of initial values with gains.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1966). Intellectual status and intellectual growth.Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L., & Ackerson, L. (1929). The mental growth curve for the Binet tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 569–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1979). Comment on a note on a base-free measure of change.Psychometrika, 44, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., Damarin, F., & Messick, S. (1966). A base-free measure of change.Psychometrika, 31, 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N. B., & Hannan, M. T. (1984).Social dynamics: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, D., & Brophy, J. (1974). Measuring teacher effects on pupil achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Tsai, S. L. (1983). Matthew effects in education.American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., & Hilton, T. L. (1977). Intellectual status and intellectual growth, again.American Educational Research Journal, 14, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. (1970). A general linear model for studying growth.Psychological Bulletin, 73, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). A simplex model for analyzing academic growth.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 745–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D. E., & Harnischfeger, A. (1973). Post hoc, ergo propter hoc: Problems in the attribution of change.Studies of Educative Processes (No. 7). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, J. (1957). The law of initial value in neurology and psychiatry.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 125, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, J. (1965). Pitfalls in the methodology of the law of initial value.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 19, 577–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J. (1938). Growth rate determinations in nutrition studies with the bacon pig and their analysis.Biometrika, 30, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. F. (1980). Cognitive development in childhood. In O. G. Brim, Jr. & J. Kagan (Eds.),Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1940). Interrelations of measures of learning.Journal of Psychology, 10, 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1946). The ability to learn.Psychological Review, 53, 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by a grant from The Spencer Foundation to the senior author and by the Study of Stanford and the Schools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogosa, D.R., Willett, J.B. Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika 50, 203–228 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294247

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294247

Key words

Navigation