Skip to main content
Log in

Bayes modal estimation in item response models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes a Bayesian framework for estimation in item response models, with two-stage prior distributions on both item and examinee populations. Strategies for point and interval estimation are discussed, and a general procedure based on the EM algorithm is presented. Details are given for implementation under one-, two-, and three-parameter binary logistic IRT models. Novel features include minimally restrictive assumptions about examinee distributions and the exploitation of dependence among item parameters in a population of interest. Improved estimation in a moderately small sample is demonstrated with simulated data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973).Conditional inference and models for measuring. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B., & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of a latent population distribution.Psychometrika, 42, 357–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando, A., & Kaufman, O. M. (1965). Bayesian analysis of the independent normal process—neither mean nor precision known.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.),Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Aitken, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm.Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment.Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B),39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsmore, I. R. (1976). Asymptotic predictor analysis.Biometrika, 63, 627–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Norris, C. (1975). Data analysis using Stein's estimator and its generalizations.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research.Acta Psychologica, 37, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1983).Bayes theory. New York: Springer-Verlang.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W., & Stein, C. (1961). Estimation with quadratic loss.Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Probability and Statistics (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1961).Theory of probability (3rd ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. L. (1927).The interpretation of educational of educational measurements. New York: World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, T., & Novick, M. R.. (1985).Bayesian inference and diagnostics for the three-parameter logistic model (ONR Technical Report 85-5). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1985).Estimating individual abilities with imperfectly known item response functions. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society, Nashville, TN.

  • Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M. (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B),34, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores.Psychometrika Monograph No. 7,17(4, Pt. 2).

  • Lord, F. M. (1975).Evaluation with artificial data of a procedure for estimating ability and item characteristic curve parameters (RB-75-33). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions.Psychometrika, 49, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J. (in preparation).Stochastic test designs (Research Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

  • Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1982).BILOG: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer program]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1985). Implementation of anEM algorithm in the estimation of item parameters. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.),Proceedings of the IRT/CAT Conference. Minneapolis, MN: Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1985).Computing approximate marginal distributions in the Rasch logistic test model using prior information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.

  • Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations.Econometrica, 16, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., Jackson, P. H., Thayer, D. T., & Cole, N. S. (1972). Estimating multiple regressions inm-groups: A cross-validational study.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 5, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, A. (1976). On posterior joint and marginal modes.Biometrika, 63, 329–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, M. R. (1981, June).Bayesian estimation of item parameters in the two-parameter logistic model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society in Chapel Hill, NC.

  • Rigdon, S., & Tsutakawa, R. K. (1983). Parameter estimation in latent trait models.Psychometrika, 48, 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data.Biometrika, 63, 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1980). Using empirical Bayes techniques in the law school validity studies.Journal of the American Statistical Society, 75, 801–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanathanan, L., & Blumenthal, N. (1978). The logistic model and latent structure.Journal of the American Statistical Association.73, 794–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, A. H., & Sechrest, D. (1966).Gaussian quadrature formulas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1981).Bayesian estimation in the three-parameter logistic model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Chapel Hill, NC.

  • Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1982). Bayesian estimation in the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, H. A. (1985). Bayesian estimation in the two-parameter logistic model.Psychometrika, 50, 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model.Psychometrika, 47, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1982). Some standard errors in item response theory.Psychometrika, 47, 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant from the Spencer Foundation, Chicago, IL. Comments and suggestions on earlier drafts by Charles Lewis, Frederic Lord, Rosenbaum, James Ramsey, Hiroshi Watanabe, the editor, and two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mislevy, R.J. Bayes modal estimation in item response models. Psychometrika 51, 177–195 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293979

Key words

Navigation