Skip to main content
Log in

A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The earlier two-sample procedure of Feldt [1969] for comparing independent alpha reliability coefficients is extended to the case ofK ≥ 2 independent samples. Details of a normalization of the statistic under consideration are presented, leading to computational procedures for the overallK-group significance test and accompanying multiple comparisons. Results based on computer simulation methods are presented, demonstrating that the procedures control Type I error adequately. The results of a power comparison of the case ofK=2 with Feldt's [1969]F test are also presented. The differences in power were negligible. Some final observations, along with suggestions for further research, are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  1. Nitko, A. J.The power functions of some proposed tests for significance of coefficient alpha in the one-sample and two-sample cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1968.

References

  1. Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldt, L. S. The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feldt, L. S. A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests.Psychometrika, 1969,34, 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hays, W. L.Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler, R. A. A comparison of the validities of conventional choice testing and various confidence marking procedures.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kristof, W. The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C. C.Introduction to experimental statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lord, F. M. Sampling fluctuations resulting from the sampling of test items.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lord, F. M., and Novick, M.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marascuilo, L. A. Large-sample multiple comparisons.Psychological Bulletin, 1966,65, 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson, E. An approximate normalization of the analysis of variance distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1942,13, 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, C. R.Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scheffé, H.The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, E. B., and Hilferty, M. M. The distribution of chi-square.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1931,17, 684–688.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Michael E. Masson, in the computations performed, and of Leonard S. Feldt, in suggesting the data generation procedures used in the study. In addition, the authors thank James Zidek and the Institute of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of British Columbia, for advice concerning some of the theoretical development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakstian, A.R., Whalen, T.E. A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika 41, 219–231 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291840

Key words

Navigation