Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on factorial invariance

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lawley's selection theorem is applied to subpopulations derived from a parent in which the classical factor model holds for a specified set of variables. The results show that there exists an invariant factor pattern matrix that describes the regression of observed on factor variables in every subpopulation derivable by selection from the parent, given that selection does not occur directly on the observable variables and does not reduce the rank of the system. However, such a factor pattern matrix is not unique, which in turn implies that if a simple structure factor pattern matrix can be satisfactorily determined in one such subpopulation the same simple structure can be found in any subpopulation derivable by selection. The implications of these results for “parallel proportional profiles” and “factor matching” techniques are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmavaraa, Y. The mathematical theory of factorial invariance under selection.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitken, A. C. Note on selection from a multivariate normal population.Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 1934,4, 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barlow, J. A. and Burt, C. The identification of factors from different experiments.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1954,7, 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birnbaum, Z. W., Paulson, E., and Andrews, F. C. On the effects of selection performed on some coordinates of a multi-dimensional population.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 191–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cattell, R. B. “Parallel proportional profiles” and other principles for determining the choice of factors by rotation.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cattell, R. B. and Cattell, A. K. S. Factor solutions for proportional profiles: Analytical solution and an example.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1955,8, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harman, H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horst, P. Relations betweenm sets of variates.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawley, D. N. A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae.Proc. roy. Soc. Edinburgh (Section A), 1943–44,62, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomson, G. H. and Ledermann, W. The influence of multivariate selection on the factorial analysis of ability.Brit. J. Psychol., 1939,29, 288–305.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wrigley, C. and Neuhaus, J. The matching of two sets of factors. Contract Memorandum Report, A-32, Univ. Illinois, 1955.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meredith, W. Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika 29, 177–185 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289699

Keywords

Navigation