Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability for the law of comparative judgment

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variance-components analysis is presented for paired comparisons in terms of three components:s, the scale value of the stimuli;d, a deviation from the linear model specified by the law of comparative judgment; andb, a binomial error component. Estimates are given for each of the three variances, σ 2 s , σ 2 d , and σ 2 b . Several coefficients, analogous to reliability coefficients, based on these three variances are indicated. The techniques are illustrated in a replicated comparison of handwriting specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayres, L. P.A scale for measuring the quality of handwriting of school children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, C. A. and Franklin, N. L.Statistical analysis in chemistry and the chemical industry. New York: Wiley, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cochran, W. G. The χ2 test of goodness of fit.Ann. math. Statist., 1952,23, 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davies, O. L. (Ed.)Design and analysis of industrial experiments. New York: Hafner, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan, A. J.Quality control and industrial statistics. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A.Statistical methods for research workers. (10th ed.) London: Oliver and Boyd, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, R. A. and Yates, F.Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. New York: Hafner, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, M. F. and Tukey, J. W. Transformations related to the angular and the square root.Ann. math. Statist., 1950,21, 607–611.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hald, A.Statistical tables and formulas. New York: Wiley, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kendall, M. G.Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kendall, M. G. and Babington-Smith, B. On the method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1940,31, 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mood, A. M.Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thurstone, L. L. Psychophysical analysis.Amer. J. Psychol., 1927,38, 368–389.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment.Psychol. Rev., 1927,34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tippett, L. H. C.The methods of statistics. (4th ed.) New York: Wiley, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was jointly supported in part by Princeton University, the Office of Naval Research under contract Nonr-1858(15), and the National Science Foundation under grant NSF G-642, and in part by Educational Testing Service. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.

Thanks are due to Ledyard Tucker and Frederic Lord for valuable suggestions on the development presented here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulliksen, H., Tukey, J.W. Reliability for the law of comparative judgment. Psychometrika 23, 95–110 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289008

Keywords

Navigation