Skip to main content
Log in

Error of measurement and the sensitivity of a test of significance

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implications of random error of measurement for the sensitivity of theF test of differences between means are elaborated. By considering the mathematical models appropriate to design situations involving true and fallible measures, it is shown how measurement error decreases the sensitivity of a test of significance. A method of reducing such loss of sensitivity is described and recommended for general practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, H. W. The estimation of reliability when several trials are available.Psychometrika, 1947,12, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrenberg, A. S. C. The unbiased estimation of heterogeneous error variances.Biometrika, 1950,37, 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, Helen M. and Lev, J.Statistical inference. New York: Holt, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to express my thanks in acknowledgement that the present form of this paper has benefited from editorial comment, and from the advice of Dr. H. Mulhall of the Department of Mathematics, University of Sydney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutcliffe, J.P. Error of measurement and the sensitivity of a test of significance. Psychometrika 23, 9–17 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288974

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288974

Keywords

Navigation