Skip to main content
Log in

A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in ontario

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This brief report describes a feasibility study conducted to assess the level of satisfaction with the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) rater reliability training, the ease of achieving interrater reliability in rating CAFAS, and the clinical utility of CAFAS as an outcome measurement tool for the province of Ontario, from the perspective of service providers. This study has been instrumental in the development of a 4-year province-wide measurement initiative. The study proved useful to government policy and decision-makers, mental health administrators, clinicians, and mental health service researchers interested in the implementation of outcome measurement tools. It highlighted the fact that at least 85% of respondents were satisfied with CAFAS training and the ease of achieving interrater reliability. The majority identified the usefulness of the tool in case formulation and the value in tracking changes over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Raphael D, Weir P, Weston A, et al.Outcome Measurement in Children's Mental Health. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koch JR, Lewis A, McCall D. A multistakeholder-driven model for developing an outcome management system.Journal of Behavioural Health Services and Research. 1998;25(2):151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hodges K.Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. 3rd ed. Ypsilanti, Mich: Eastern Michigan University; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodges K, Wong M. Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale to predict service utilization and cost.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1997;24(3):278–290.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hodges K, Gust J. Measures of impairment for children and adolescents.Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1995;22:403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hodges K.Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale Self-Training Manual. 3d ed. Ypsilanti, Mich: Eastern Michigan University; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodges K, Wong M. Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale.Journal of Child and Family Studies. 1996;5(4):445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erlandson D, Harris E, Skipper BL, et al. Quality criteria for a naturalistic study. In: Erlandson D, Skipper BL, Allen SD, eds.Doing Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1993:131–161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine M. Boydell PhD.

Additional information

She is also affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry and the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

He is also affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health Sciences, and the Department of Psychology at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

She is also affiliated with the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boydell, K.M., Barwick, M., Ferguson, H.B. et al. A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in ontario. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 32, 105–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287332

Keywords

Navigation