Abstract
In this article, earlier work on the organization of the household day is revisited to bring a sociological perspective to the study of household time. There is much to be gained from elaborating the conceptualization and measurement of time use to acknowledge and the employment of its dynamic qualities and meanings. That is, analysis of household time use must become far more than a longitudinal accounting process. In this article, no roadmap to such a destination can be provided but perhaps movement in a new direction. The practical application of insights from research on household time use requires conceptual frameworks that allow household time to be depicted as it unfolds and as participants experience it. That is, serious attention might be lent not only to studying where time is spent but also to how activities are situated and experienced in time to realize human affairs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berk, R. A., & Berk, S. F. (1979).Labor and leisure at home: Content and organization of the household day. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Berk, S. F. (1985).The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum Press.
Bott, E. (1957).Family and social network. London: Tavistock.
Coverman, S. (1983). Gender, domestic labor time, and wage inequality.American Sociological Review, 48, 623–637.
DeVault, M. L. (1991).Feeding the family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1991). Gender inequalities, new conceptual terrain. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.),Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 289–307). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1983).Sex stratification: Children, housework and jobs. New York: Academic Press.
Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. (Eds.). (1985).Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research.
Komarovsky, M. (1962).Blue-collar marriage. New York: Random House.
Lopata, H. Z. (1971).Occupation: Housewife. London: Oxford University Press.
Lukács, G. (1971).History and class consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Morgan, J. N., Sirageldin, I. A., & Baerwaldt, N. (1966).Productive Americans. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research.
Oakley, A. (1974).The sociology of housework. New York: Pantheon.
Robinson, J. (1977).How Americans use time: A social-psychological analysis of everyday behavior. New York: Praeger.
Szalai, A. (Ed.) (1972).The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton.
Walker, K. E. & Woods, M. E. (1976).Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association, Center for the Family.
Zerubavel, E. (1981).Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
She is the author ofThe Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households, and in 1995 she coeditedindividual Voices, Collective Visions: 50 Years of Women in Sociology, published by Temple University Press. Her current work focuses on the theoretical articulation of race, class and gender in women's work.
This paper required a good deal of reflection on a project I undertook with Richard A. Berk in 1975. I am grateful for his comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fenstermaker, S. The dynamics of time use: Context and meaning. J Fam Econ Iss 17, 231–243 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265018
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265018