Skip to main content
Log in

The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although schemas play a central role in cognitive conceptualizations of personality disorders, research devoted to the assessment of schemas has been scarce. This article describes the preliminary validation of a measure of schemas relevant to personality disorders. The Schema Questionnaire (SQ) was developed using five independent samples (N=1,564). In study 1, factor analyses using a student sample revealed 13 primary schemas. A hierarchical factor analysis revealed three higher-order factors. In study 2, factor analyses using a patient sample revealed 15 primary schemas. The patient and student samples produced similar sets of primary factors which also closely matched the rationally developed schemas and their hypothesized hierarchical relationships (Young, 1991). The primary subscales were found to possess adequate test-retest reliability and internal consistency. In study 3, the SQ was found to possess convergent and discriminant validity with respect to measures of psychological distress, self-esteem, cognitive vulnerability for depression, and personality disorder symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression.Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arieti, S., & Bemporad, J. (1980). The psychological organization of depression.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1360–1365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1988).Anxiety and its disorders. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967).Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In R. Clayton & J. E. Barret (Eds.),Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches. (pp. 265–290). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985).Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Freeman, A. & Associates. (1991).Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979).Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R., & Garbin, M. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: 25 years of evaluation.Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. L. (1941).The factors of the mind: An introduction to factor-analysis in psychology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1949). A note on factor invariance and the identification of factors.British Journal of Psychology, 2, 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3, 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., & Baggaley, A. R. (1960). The salient variable similarity index for factor matching.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 13, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Balcar, K. R., Horn, J. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1969). Factor matching procedures: An improvement of thes index; with tables.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 781–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1969). A profile similarity coefficient invariant over variable reflection.Psychological Bulletin, 71, 281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. (1983).SCL-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the (R)evised version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S., & Breiter, H. J. (1983). Cognitive assessment of depression: Reliability and validity of three measures.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 107–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dohr, K. V., Rush, A. J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1989). Cognitive biases and depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (1987). Behavioral and cognitive approaches in the treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In P. J. V. Beumont, G. D. Burrows, & R. C. Casper (Eds.),Handbook of anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Sensitivity to feared stimuli in obsessive-compulsives: A dichotic listening analysis.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A., & Leaf, R. (1989). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. In A. Freeman, K. Simon, L. Beutler, & H. Arkowitz (Eds.),Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (1983).Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammon, C., Marks, T., Mayol, A., & DeMayo, R. (1985). Depressive self-schemas, life stress, and vulnerability to depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 308–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L. K. G. (1990). The experiential aspects of bulimia nervosa: Implications for cognitive-behavioral therapy.Behavioral Modification, 14, 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, S. E., & Rieder, R. O. (1987).PDQ-R: Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire — Revised. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Kellman, H. D., Oldham, J. M., & Rosnick, L. (1990). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire — Revised: Comparison with two structured interviews.American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1043–1048.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. G., & Bornstein, R. F. (1991). Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire — Revised (PDQ-R) personality disorder scores and negative life events independently predict changes in Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) psychopathology scores.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. (1961). A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 249–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1986). Dysfunctional attitudes and a self-worth contingency model of depression. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 5, pp. 115–142). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1989). Stress and cognitive vulnerability to depression: A self-worth contingency model. In R. W. J. Neufeld (Ed.),Advances in the investigation of psychological stress. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., & MacDonald, M. R. (1988). Vulnerability and episodic cognitions in a self-worth contingency model of depression. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.),Cognitive processes in depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S., & Oei, T. P. S. (1992). Differential causal roles of dysfunctional attitudes and automatic thoughts in depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 563–569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S., & Maser, J. D. (Eds.). (1988).Panic: Psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. (1965).Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. (1988). Appraisal of the self-schema: Construct in cognitive models of depression.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 147–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., & Vella, D. D. (1990). Self-schema in major depression: Replication and extension of a priming methodology.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber, E., & Tippett, J. S. (1965). Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation.Psychological Reports, 16, 1017–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS. (1988).SPSS-X user's guide (3rd ed.). Chicago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.),Social psychological perspectives on the self. (Vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D. L., Johnson, C., Steinberg, S., Staats, S., & Dennis, A. B. (1991). Multifactorial assessment of bulimia nervosa.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1951).A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984; Contract DA-49-083, Department of the Army). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020–1030.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1990).The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule — Expanded Form. Unpublished manuscript, Southern Methodist University.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1984). Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U. S. findings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, A. N. (1979). The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: a validation study. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1389–1390B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, C. S., & Newhaus, J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors.American Psychologist, 10, 418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (1990).Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (1991).Early maladaptive schemas. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Zimmerman, M., & Coryell, W. H. (1990). Diagnosing personality disorders in the community: A comparison of self-report and interview measures.Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 527–531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jane Rigg for her assistance in data collection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, N.B., Joiner, T.E., Young, J.E. et al. The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cogn Ther Res 19, 295–321 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230402

Key words

Navigation