Skip to main content
Log in

Fewer reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The brief reasons for living inventory

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Linehan Reasons for Living Inventory is a 48-item scale on which respondents rate how important each item would be for living if suicide were contemplated. The inventory possesses good psychometric properties and can distinguish suicidal from nonsuicidal people among shoppers, psychiatric inpatients, college students, and adolescents. As its length limits its utility in many institutional and screening settings, the purpose of this study was (1) to develop a brief form of the Reasons for Living Inventory appropriate for clinical use and (2) to examine the predictive validity of this brief measure, named the Brief Reasons for Living Inventory (BRFL), to distinguish suicidal from nonsuicidal prison inmates. Results indicate that the brief form was as good as either the Beck Depression Inventory or the Beck Hopelessness Scale at predicting suicidality in this population. Further study is needed to validate the BRFL with different institutionalized and other populations as well as to assess its ability to discriminate suicide ideators from those engaging in overt suicidal behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, C. W. (1972). Hope and suicide in the concentration camp. In E. S. Shneidman, (Ed.),Death and the college student (pp. 12–29). New York: Behavioral Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Resnik, H. L. P., & Lettieri, D. J. (Eds.). (1974).The prediction of suicide. Bowie, MD: Charles Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861–865.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979). Assessment of suicidal intention: The scale for suicidal ideation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 343–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clum, G. A., Patsoikas, A. T., & Luscomb, R. L. (1979). Empirically-based comprehensive treatment program for parasuicide.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 937–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C. A. (1989). Validation of the Reasons for Living Inventory in general and delinquent adolescent samples.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 13–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edward, A. L. (1970).The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1959).From death camp to existentialism. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. (1982).Cognitive characteristics of suicide attempters. Doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1953). Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates.Psychometrika, 18, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed., rev.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. J. (1977). Indices descriptive of factor complexity.Journal of General Psychology, 96, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. J. (1978). Complexity and simplicity as objective indices descriptive of factor solutions.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanoff, A., & Jang, S. J. (1991). The role of hopelessness and social desirability in predicting suicidal behavior: A study of prison inmates.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 394–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreitman, N. (1977).Parasuicide. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: The Butterworth Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1981). A social-behavioral analysis of suicide and parasuicide: Implications for clinical assessment and treatment. In H. G. Glazer & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.),Depression: Behavioral and directive intervention strategies (pp. 229–294) New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., Goodstein, J., Neilsen, S. L., & Chiles, J. A. (1983). Reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The Reasons for Living Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 276–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1983).Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, R. W., Berman, A. L., Maltsberger, J. T., & Yufit, R. I. (1992).Assessment and prediction of suicide. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. (1972).The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, C. (Ed.) (1974).Psychological assessment of suicide risk. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyra, C. J., Range, L. M., & Goggin, W. C. (1990). Reasons for living following success and failure in suicidal and nonsuicidal college students.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 861–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A. Jones, K., & Osman, J. R. (1991). The Reasons for Living Inventory: Psychometric properties.Psychological Reports, 69, 271–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Gifford, J., Jones, T., Lickiss, L.,et al. (1993). Psychometric evaluation of the Reasons for Living Inventory.Psychological Assessment, 5, 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzek, R. M. (1977). Factor analysis. In J. Belzer, (Ed.),Encyclopedia of computer science and technology (pp. 161–187). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Range, L. M., & Ellis, J. B. (1989). Does mood affect reasons for living? Yes.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 3, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Range, L. M., Goggin, W. C., & Steede, K. C. (1988). Perception of behavioral contagion of adolescent suicide.Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 18, 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steede, K. C., & Range, L. M. (1989). Does television induce suicide contagion with adolescents?Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Support for this project was provided in part by the New York State Office of Mental Health Bureau of Forensic Services and the New York State Department of Correctional Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanoff, A., Jang, S.J., Smyth, N.J. et al. Fewer reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The brief reasons for living inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 16, 1–13 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229062

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229062

Key words

Navigation