Abstract
Inconsistent findings of attitude-behavior relations are commonly attributed to uncontrolled domain, time, or situational factors. Without integrative work, studies accounting for these factors may further complicate research by introducing potentially numerous “third variables” and render a coherent understanding of the attitude-behavior relationship even more difficult to achieve. In this paper, a developmental perspective is taken and the attitude-behavior relationship in delinquency is examined using three modes of investigation: multivariate patterns of attitude-behavior associations, their mutual predictability, and their developmental trajectories. Three grade cohorts of public school boys (n=1517 of the first, seventh, and tenth grades, initially) were followed over a period of 4 years, with an average age span of 7–16 years. Correspondence analyses suggested that adolescent boys with a tolerant attitude toward theft or violence were more deviant than those who had actual behavior of theft or violence. Stronger attitude effect on subsequent behavior, relative to behavior effect on subsequent attitudes, was found among boys aged 10–12 years. While mean scores of tolerant attitudes to serious theft and violence increased linearly with their behavior counterparts between 6 and 17 years of age, ages 11 and 14 were two turning points at which most delinquent attitudes and behaviors escalated at a higher speed. In general, delinquent attitudes and behaviors were related to each other in various patterns, and age was a defining factor that provided much of the explanation for the inconsistencies in research findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, R. (1985). Social control theory and delinquency: A longitudinal test.Criminology 23: 47–61.
Agnew, R. (1989). A longitudinal test of the revised strain theory.J. Quant. Criminol. 5: 373–387.
Agnew, R. (1991). A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 126–156.
Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence.Criminology 32: 555–580.
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychol. Bull. 84: 888–919.
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 636–655.
Albrecht, S. L., and Carpenter, K. E. (1976). Attitudes as predictors of behavior versus behavior intentions: A convergence of research traditions.Sociometry 39: 1–10.
Andrews, K. H., and Kandel, D. B. (1979). Attitude and behavior: A specification of the contingent consistency hypothesis.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 298–210.
Asendorpf, J. B., and Weinert, F. E. (1990). Stability of patterns and patterns of stability in personality development. In Magnusson, D., and Bergman, L. R. (eds.).Data Quality in Longitudinal Research, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 181–197.
Baggozi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1989). The degree of intention formation as moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship.Soc. Psychol. Q. 52: 266–279.
Bentler, P. M., and Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations.Psychol. Rev. 86: 452–464.
Bentler, P. M., and Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behavior: A structural equation analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 40: 226–238.
Burkett, S. R., and Warren, B. O. (1987). Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: A panel study of underlying causal structures.Criminology 25: 109–131.
Carlsson, G., and Karlsson, K. (1970). Age, cohorts and the generation of generations.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 710–718.
Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T., (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Davidson, A. R., and Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1364–1376.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior. I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1097–1126.
Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior. II. Implications for psychological research.Am. Psychol. 35: 790–806.
Fazio, R. H., Power, M. C., and Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process.J. Consum. Res. 16: 280–288.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Glenn, N. D. (1980). Values, attitudes, and beliefs. In Brim, O. G., Jr., and Katen, J. (eds.).Constancy and Change in Human Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 597–640.
Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., and Geerken, M. (1985). Are uniform crime reports a valid indicator of the index crime? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications.Criminology 23: 451–501.
Grasmick, H. G., and Green, D. E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 71: 325–335.
Grube, J. W., and Morgan, M. (1990). Attitude-social support interactions: Contingent consistency effects in the prediction of adolescent smoking, drinking, and drug use.Soc. Psychol. Q. 53: 329–339.
Heise, D. (1997). Groups dynamics and attitude-behavior relations.Sociol. Methods Res. 5: 239–288.
Hoem, J. M. (1992). Weighting, misclassification, and other issues in the analysis of survey samples of life histories. In Heckman, J. J., and Singer, B. (eds.),Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 249–293.
Jaccard, J., King, G. W., and Pomazal, R. (1977). Attitudes and behavior: An analysis of specificity of attidunal predictors.Hum. Relat. 30: 817–824.
Jackson, P. G. (1990). Sources of data. In Kempf, K. (ed.),Measurement Issues in Criminology, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 21–50.
Jennrich, R. I., and Schluchter, M. D. (1986). Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance metrices.Biometrics 42: 805–820.
Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. L. (1977).Problem Behavior and Psychological Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth, Academic Press, New York.
Johnson, R. E., Marcos, A. C., and Bahr, S. (1987). The role of peers in the complex etiology of adolescent drug use.Criminology 25: 323–340.
Kahle, L. R., and Berman, J. J. (1979). Attitudes cause behaviors: A cross-lagged panel analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 315–321.
Kelley, S., Jr., and Mirer, T. W. (1974). The simple act of voting.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 68: 572–591.
Kelman, H. C. (1974). Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action.Am. Psychol. 29: 310–324.
Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness.Psychol. Bull. 82: 887–903.
Kessler, R. C., and Greenberg, D. F. (1981).Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change, Academic Press, New York.
Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model.Soc. Psychol. Q. 47: 61–74.
Liska, A. E., Felson, R. B., Chamlin, M., and Baccaglini, W. (1984). Estimating attitudebehavior reciprocal effects within a theoretical specification.Soc. Psychol. Q. 47: 15–23.
Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, W., and Farrington, D. P. (1989). Deveopment of a new measure of self-reported antisocial behavior for young children: Prevalence and reliability. In Klein, M. W. (ed.),Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 203–225.
Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., and van KÄmmen, W. (1994).Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems in childhood and adolescence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.
Matsueda, R. L. (1989). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance.Soc. Forces 68: 428–457.
Menard, S., and Huizinga, D. (1994). Changes in conventional attitudes and delinquent behavior in adolescence.Youth Soc. 26: 23–53.
Minor, W. W. (1984). Neutralization as a hardening process: Considerations in the modeling of change.Soc. Forces 62: 995–1019.
Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. (1991). The preventive effects of the perceived risk of arrest: Testing an expanded conception of deterrence.Criminology 29: 561–587.
Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. In Collins, L. M., and Horn, J. L. (eds.),Best Methods for the Analysis of Change, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 92–105.
Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood.Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 81–93.
Paternoster, R., and Triplett, R. (1988). Disaggregating self-reported delinquency and its implications for theory.Criminology 26: 591–620.
Sampson, R. J., and Laub, J. H. (1993).Crime in the making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Schwartz, S. H., and Tessler, R. C. (1972). A test of a model for reducing measured attitudebehavior discrepancies.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 24: 225–236.
Skinner, W. F., and Cattarello, A. M. (1989). Understanding the relationships among attitudes, group norms, and behavior using behavioral commitment: A structural equation analysis of marijuana use.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19: 1268–1291.
Smith, D. A., and Brame, R. (1994). On the initiation and continuation of delinquency.Criminology 32: 607–629.
Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 664–670.
Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency.Criminology 25: 863–891.
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., and Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory.Criminology 32: 47–83.
Van de Geer, J. P. (1993).Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Data: Theory, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
van der Heijden, P. G. M., and de Leeuw, J. (1989). Correspondence analysis, with special attention to the analysis of panel data and event history data. In Clogg, C. C. (ed.).Sociological Methodology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 43–87.
van Kammen, W., Loeber, R., and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1991). Substance use, antisocial, and delinquent behavior in young boys.Youth Adolesc. 20: 445–451.
Warr, M., and Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology 29: 851–866.
Weller, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1990).Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1973).The Study of Behavioral Developments, Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Q., Loeber, R. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples. J Quant Criminol 13, 181–215 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221307
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221307