Skip to main content
Log in

Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been extremely difficult to teach speech to severely handicapped nonverbal autistic children. However, an overview of the literature suggests the possibility that selecting aspects of motivation as a central target behavior, rather than concentrating on motor speech production per se, may improve the effectiveness of teaching speech to these children. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to compare two different reinforcement conditions; one in which successive motor approximations of speech sounds were reinforced; and a “motivation” condition in which attempts to produce speech sounds were reinforced, without any motor shaping of speech. The results, replicated within a repeated reversal disign, showed that reinforcing speech attempts was more effective than reinforcing motor speech sounds with respect to (a) the children's interest, enthusiasm, happiness, and general behavior during treatment; and (b) improvements in the children's speech production. The results are discussed in terms of their relationship to the literature on normal parent-child speech interaction, success and failure, and learned helplessness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984).Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, D. W. (1971). Effects of success and failure in psychotic children.Archives of General Psychiatry, 25, 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 619–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egel, A. L. (1980). The effects of constant versus varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egel, A. L. (1981). Reinforcer variation: Implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, K. R. (1968). Shaping and increasing verbalizations in an autistic child in response to visual color stimulation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 27, 1071–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E. E., & DeHaven, E. D. (1974). Use of operant techniques in the establishment and generalization of language: A review and analysis.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, L., Schuler, A., & Sailor, W. (1983). Motivational considerations in teaching language to severely handicapped studlents. In M. Hersen, V. Van Hassett, & J. Matson (Eds.),Behavior therapy for the developmentally and physically disabled (pp. 57–77). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, F. M. (1965). Teaching speech to an autistic child through operant conditioning.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 35, 927–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, J. H., & Carrier, Q. K. (1978). Intervention stategies for nonspeech children. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. (1976).Phonological disability in children. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1986). The effects of interspersed maintenance tasks on academic performance in a severe childhood stroke victim.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L. K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. (1979). Motivating autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Johnson, J. (in press). Motivating language use in autistic children. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: New perspectives on diagnosis. New York: Guilford.

  • Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1988). Generalized responsivity and pivotal behaviors. In R. H. Horner, G. Dunlap, & R. L. Koegel (Eds.),Generalization and maintenance: Lifestyle changes in applied settings (pp. 41–66). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Mentis, M. (1985). Motivation in childhood autism: Can they or won't they?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children.Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 17, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1976). Identification of consistent responding to auditory stimuli by a functionally “deaf” autistic child.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 6, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Traphagen, J. (1982). Selection of initial words of speech training with nonverbal children. In R. L. Koegel, A. Rincover, & A. L. Egel (Eds.),Educating and Understanding Autistic Children (pp. 65–77). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1977).The autistic child. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., Berberich, J. P., Perooff, B. F., & Schaeffer, B. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children.Science, 151, 705–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, D. L. (1971). The problem of motivation in the education of the mentally retarded.Exceptional Children, 37, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, D. L. (1975). Effect of experimental success and failure on the situational expectancy of EMR and nonretarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1978).Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, P. (1966). The psychological assessment of autistic children, In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism: Clinical, educational, and social aspects (pp. 145–158). London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. (1972). Principles of interaction in language learning.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1966). Prognosis: Psychotic children in adolescence and early adult life. In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism: Clinical, educational, and social aspects. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1978). Diagnosis and definition of childhood autism.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 8, 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvo, E. R. & Freeman, B. J. (1978). National Society for Autistic Children definition of the syndrome of autism.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 34, 235–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schane, S. A. (1973).Generative phonology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, J. B. & Sherman, J. A. (1978). Parent as intervention agent. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1962). Two “synthetic social relations.”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 531–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, H. N., & Macaulay, B. D. (1968).Operant procedures in remedial speech and language/training. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Public Health Research Grants No. MH28210 and MH39434 from the National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Department of Education (Special Education Program) Research Contract No. 300-82-0362, and a grant from the California Community Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koegel, R.L., O'Dell, M. & Dunlap, G. Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts. J Autism Dev Disord 18, 525–538 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211871

Keywords

Navigation