Abstract
The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., and West, C. G. (1991).Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park.
Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.) (1976).Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9). Academic Press, New York.
Dalbert, C., Montada, L., and Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Sklaen [Belief in a just world as a motive: Validation corelates of two scales].Psychol. Beit., 29, 596–615.
Dar, Y., and Resh, N. (1993).Exploring the multidimensional structure of sense of deprivation: The case of Israeli Junior High School students. Paper presented at the IVth International Conference on Social Justice in Trier.
Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Dörfel, M. (1995).Verfahrensgerechtigkeit, dispositionelle Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität und Arbeitszufriedenheit im betrieblichen Kontext [Procedunal justice, dispositional sensitivity of befallen injustice, and job satisfaction at the work place]. Department of Psychology, Trier University (unpublished Diploma thesis).
Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1989).Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 28, 365–384.
Gergen, K. J., Morse, S. J., and Gergen, M. (1980). Behavior exchange in cross-cultural perspective. In Triandis, H., and Brislin, R. W. (eds.),Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 121–153). Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
Klauer, T., and Filipp, S.-H. (1993).Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewälting (TSK) [Trier Scales of Coping with Illness]. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
Maes, J. (1994). Blaming the victim-Belief in control or belief in justice?Soc. Just. Res. 7, 69–90.
Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.) (dy1982).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. 43–76). Academic Press, New York.
Mikula, G. (ed.) (1980).Justice and Social Interaction. Huber, Bern.
Mikula, G. (1981). Concepts of distributive justice in allocation decisions: A review of research in German-speaking countries.Ger. J. Psychol., 5, 222–236.
Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phemenology. In Bierhoff, H.-W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Interpersonal Relations (pp. 103–124). Plenum Press, New York.
Mikula, G. (1994). Perspective-related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers: A test with close relationships. In Lerner, M. J., and Mikula, G. (eds.),Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 175–203). Pnenum Press, New York.
Mohiyeddini, C. (1995).Sensibilität für widerfahrene Ungerechtigkeit als Disposition: kognitive, emotionale sowie behaviorale Reaktionen auf ungerechte Behandlung [Sensitivity to befallen injustice as a disposition: Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to unfair treatment]. Department of Psychology, Trier University (unpublished Diploma thesis).
Mohiyeddini, C., and Schmitt, M. (1995)Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in the laboratory (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 94). Department of Psychology, Trier University.
Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1983).Existentielle Schuld: Rekrutierung der Untersuchungsstichprobe, Erhebugsinstrumente und Untersuchungsplan [Existential guilt: Sample, measuement instruments, and design](Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 20). Department of Psychology, Trier University.
Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H.-W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations (pp. 125–143). Plenum Press, New York.
Montada, L., and Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged.Soc. Just. Res., 3, 313–344.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery.J. Soc. Iss. 31)3), 65–89.
Sabbagh, C., Dar, Y., and Resh, N. (1994). The structure of social justice judgments: A facet approach.Soc. Psychol. Q. 57, 244–261.
Scherer, K. R., Wallbott, H. G., and Summerfield, A. B. (eds.) (1986).Experiencing Emotion: A Cross-Cultural Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schmitt, M., Barbacsy, R., Binz, S., Buttgereit, C., Heinz, J.,Hesse, J., Kraft, S., Kuhlmann, N., Lischetzke, T., Nisslmüller, K., and Wunsch, U. (1994).Distributive Justice Research from an Interactionsst Perspective (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 78). Department of Psychology, Trier University.
Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., and Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice.Soc. J. Res. 8, 385–407.
Schwenkmezger, P., and Hodapp, V. 91989). Das State-Trait Anger Experession Inventory (STAXI): Itemmetrische und faktorenanalytiche Befunde und Untersuchungen zur Konstrucktvalidität [State-Trait Expression Inventory: Results from item analyses, factor analyses, and studies of construct validity].Trierer Psychol. Ber.,16, (Heft 1).
Spielberger, C. D. (1988).State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Research Edition. PAR, Odessa, FL.
Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In Scherer, K. (ed.),Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 175–236). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ullrich de Muynck, R., and Ullrich, R. (1976).Assertiveness-Training-Programm ATP. Pfeiffer, München.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitt, M.J., Mohiyeddini, C. Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage. Soc Just Res 9, 223–238 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197249
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197249