Skip to main content
Log in

Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identity crisis of adolescence can be thought of as involving two processes: an exploration among alternatives and a making of commitments. Ninety-nine Danish youth were assessed for degrees of exploration and of commitment in four areas: occupation, values, politics, and sex roles. Sex differences were investigated. Contrary to Erikson's theory, sexual ideology did not appear more central to women's identity formation. For both sexes, the struggle with sex roles and the search for values were the most powerful predictors of ten dependent personality variables. The study demonstrated the importance of exploration and commitment as variables in identity process in another culture, and suggested that a direct scaling of these variables is superior to the use of Marcia's category system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beiri, J. (1959). Acceptance of authority and parental identification.J. Personality 27: 74–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, A., and Keniston, K. (1960). Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 60: 151–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.The Rules of Sociological Method, 8th ed., E. G. George, ed. New York: Free Press, 1966, p. 46. (first printed in English in 1938 by University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity, yough and crisis. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, P. S. (1976). Changes in youth's attitudes toward authority: The transition from university to employment.J. Counsel. Psychol. 23: 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heist, P., Yonge, G., McConnell, T. R., and Webster, H. (1968).Omnibus Personality Inventory, C1959–68, Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Associates (1968).No Time for Youth: Growth and Constraint in College Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status.J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 3: 551–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, D. R. (1974a).Alienation vs. Exploration and Commitment: Personality and Family Correlaries of Adolescent Identity Statuses. Report from the Project for Youth Research. Royal Danish School of Educational Studies, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, D. R. (1974b). Changes in attitudes toward authority figures with the move to college: Three experiments.Dev. Psychol. 4: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, D. R. (1975).Adolescence Today: Sex Roles and the Search for Identity, Dorsey, Homewood, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, D. R. (1977). Two transitions and two crises in youth: A response to P. S. Fry's “Changes in youth's attitudes toward authority.”J. Counsel. Psychol. 24(Jan.): 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevid, J. S., Nevid, A. S., O'Neill, M., and Waterman, C. K. (1974). Sex differences in the resolution of sexual identity crisis. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Philadelpha, April.

  • Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. (1975).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G., Jr., Sprinthall, N. A., Widerman, J. W., and Jones, F. J. (1968). Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a schema. Bureau of Study Counsel, Harvard University, April, p. 123. (ERIC)

  • Phares, E. J. (1973).Locus of Control: A Personality Determinant of Behavior, General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Monogr.: Gen. Appl. 80: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, N. (1962).The American College. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkel, S., and Marcia, J. E. (1972). Attitudes toward premarital intercourse in determining ego identity status in college women.J. Personality, 3: 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, K. L. (1975). Ego identity status: A re-evaluation and extension of construct validity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

  • Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study.Am. Soc. Rev. 21: 709–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Geary, P. S., and Waterman, C. K. (1974). Longitudinal study of changes in ego identity status from the freshman to the senior year at college.Dev. Psychol. 10: 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., and Goldman, J. A. (1976). A longitudinal study of ego identity development at a liberal arts college.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 361–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., and Waterman, C. K. (1971). A longitudinal study of changes in ego identity status during the freshman year at college.Dev. Psychol. 5: 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report is based on data collected in a study funded by the Humanistic Research Council of Denmark. The first analysis of data was reported in their publication in 1974. Copies of the initial report and reprints of this article can be obtained from the author.

Teaches master's candidates in counseling and has a small private practice. Received his Ph.D. in psychology and pastoral counseling from Boston University. Main interest is adolescent identity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matteson, D.R. Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories. J Youth Adolescence 6, 353–374 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139239

Keywords

Navigation