Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multivariate investigation of dating aggression

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the following variables for their unique and combined contributions to dating aggression: exposure to aggression in the family of origin (witnessing interparental aggression or being the victim of aggressive parenting); attitudes justifying dating aggression (when humiliated or in selfdefense); child-to-parent aggression; child sexual abuse; violent sexual victimization; alcohol use; and socioeconomic status. One hundred and eleven male and 179 female undergraduates reported on their own aggressive behaviors directed toward dating partners. Together, the predictor variables accounted for 41% of the variance in male-to-female aggression but only 16% of the female-to-male aggression. Humiliation, as a justification for dating aggression, contributes to the prediction of both males' and females' dating aggression, while self-defense, although a highly endorsed condition for justifying dating aggression, does not predict actual aggressive behavior. Exposure to interparental aggression plus the product between exposure and humiliation contribute to the prediction of males' dating aggression but exposure does not play a role in females' dating aggression. Violent sexual victimization contributes unique variance to both males' and females' dating aggression. The present data highlight the importance of examining specific circumstances under which males and females justify dating aggression and how such attitudes condoning aggression affect actual behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, I., Samios, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship.J. of Interpers. Viol. 2(1), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D. J., Polich, J. M., and Stambul, H. B. (1976).Alcoholism and Treatment (R-1739-NIAAA), Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1973).Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, D., and MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the conflict tactics scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications.J. of Fam. Viol. 2: 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. L., and Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships.Fam. Relat. 32: 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. (1992). Dating violence among high school students.Social Work 37(1): 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke, T. M., and DeJoy, D. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence.J. Interpers. Viol. 8(1): 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., and Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis.Viol. Vict. 7(4): 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, F. C., Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., and Arias, I. (1990). Family precursors: Expected and actual consequences of dating aggression.J. Interpers. Viol. 5(2): 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A., and Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research.Psychol. Bull. 99(1): 66–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burcky, W., Reuterman, N., and Kopsky, S. (1988). Dating violence among high school students.School Courts. 5: 353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. E. (1990). Adolescent observers of marital violence.J. Fam. Viol. 5(4): 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital Abuse: A social psychological perspective.J. Fam. Issues 3(1): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C. P., and Gelles, R. J. (1982). Adolescent to parent violence.Urban Social Change Rev. 15: 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. E., and Wampler, K. S. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experiences.J. Social Pers. Relat. 3(4): 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A. (1987). The efficacy of a spouse abuse model in accounting for courtship violence.J. Fam. Issues 8(3): 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, U., and Straus, M. A. (1980). Some social structure determinants of inconsistency between attitudes and behavior: The case of family violence.J. Marr. Fam. 42: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., and Browning, J. J. (1988). Concern for power, fear of intimacy, and aversive stimuli for wife abuse. In Hotaling, G., Finkelhor, D., Kirkpatrick, J. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),Family Abuse and Its Consequences: New Directions in Research, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Rothbaum, B. O., Riggs, D. S., and Murdock, T. B. (1991). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral procedures and counseling.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 715–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Follette, V., and Alexander, P. C. (1992). Dating violence: Current and historical correlates.Behav. Assess. 14: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Polek, D. S., and McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women.J. Fam. Viol. 3(3): 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girshick, L. B. (1993, August). Teen dating violence.Viol. Update 3: 1–2,4, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C. S. (1985). “Don't Hit Your Wife... Unless...” Preliminary findings of normative support for the use of physical force by husbands.Victimol. Int. J. 10: 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A., Stockard, J., and Bohmer, S. (1987). Learning courtship aggression: The influence of parents, peers, and personal experiences.Fam. Relat. 36: 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henton, J. M., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., and Christopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships.J. Fam. Issues 4(3): 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1965).Two Factor Index of Social Position, Yale Station, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992). Attributions and marital violent men: The role of cognitions in marital violence. In Harvey, J. H., Orbuch, T. L., and Weber, A. L. (eds.),Attributions, Accounts, and Close Relationships, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., and Anglin, K. (1991). The competency of responses given by maritally violent versus nonviolent men to problematic marital situations.Viol Vict. 6: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., and Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intention to wife behavior: The attributions of maritally violent versus nonviolent men.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 102: 206–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julian, T. W., and McKenry, P. C. (1993). Mediators of male violence toward female intimates.J. Fam. Viol. 8(1): 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, E. K., and Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex.J. Fam. Issues 6(1): 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. (1990). Abusive teen dating relationships: An emerging issue for the 90's.Resp. Victim. Wom. Child. 13(1): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students.Fam. Relat. 30: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization.Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1987). Social factors and victim-offender differences in courtship violence.Fam. Relat. 36: 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., and Foo, L. (1992). The Attitudes About Dating Scale, unpublished measure at the University of Southern California.

  • Margolin, G., John, R. S., and Foo, L. (1995). Interactive and unique risk factors for husbands' emotional and physical abuse of their wives, manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Marshall, L. L., and Rose, P. (1987). Gender, stress and violence in the adult relationships of a sample of college students.J. Social Pers. Relat. 4: 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L., and Rose, P. (1988). Family of origin violence and courtship abuse.J. Counsel Devel 66: 414–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L., and Rose, P. (1990). Premarital violence: The impact of family of origin violence, stress, and reciprocity.Viol Vict. 5(1): 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W. J. (1984). Violence in college couples.College Stud. J. 18(2): 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keeffe, N. K., Brockopp, K., and Chew, E. (1986). Teen dating violence.Social Work 31: 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resick, P. A. and Schnicke, M. K. (1992). Cognitive processing therapy for sexual assault victims.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 60: 748–756.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S. (1993). Relationship problems and dating aggression: A potential treatment target.J. Interpers. Viol 8(1): 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Theoretical model of courtship aggression. In Pirog-Good, M. A. and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues Praeger, New York, pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., and Breslin, F. C. (1990). Multiple correlates of physical aggression in dating couples.J. Interpers. Viol. 5(1): 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, B. (1985). Courtship violence: Acceptable forms and situations.Coll. Stud. J. 19(4): 389–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. E. H. (1983). The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extra-familial sexual abuse of female children.Child Abuse Negl. 7: 133–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense?Viol Vict. 1: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In Yllo, K. and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. (1959).The Analysis of Variance, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., and Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students' dating relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 5(6): 530–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., and Williams, J. G. (1992). From abusive household to dating violence.Journal of Fam. Viol. 7(2): 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychol. Quart. 50(3): 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A. and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, L., Oates, K., and McDowell, M. (1987). Personality development following sexual abuse.Child Abuse Negl. 11: 371–383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tontodonato, P., and Crew, B. K. (1992). Dating violence, social learning theory, and gender: A multivariate analysis.Viol Vict. 7(1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, P. K., and Putnam, F. W. (1993). Impact of child sexual abuse on females: Toward a developmental psychobiological integration.Psychological Sci. 4(2): 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich, P., and Huber, J. (1981). Observing parental violence: Distribution and effects.J. Marr. Fam. 44: 623–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., and Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students.Viol. Vict. 6(4): 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Reitzel, D., and Gough, R. (1995). Strategies to address violence in the lives of high-risk youth. In Pelad, E., Jaffe, P. G., and Edelson, J. L. (eds.),Ending the Cycle of Violence: Community Responses to Children of Battered Women. Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, SGM 501, University of Southern California, 90089-1061, Los Angeles, California

    Louise Foo & Gayla Margolin

Authors
  1. Louise Foo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gayla Margolin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foo, L., Margolin, G. A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. J Fam Viol 10, 351–377 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110711

Key words

Search

Navigation