Abstract
What do we know about the effects of school size on adolescent development? This article addresses this issue, based on a review of the available evidence. While this evidence is sketchy, it does offer three important hypotheses to guide our efforts to understand the human ecology of adolescence. First, school size matters, particularly to academically marginal students. Second, school size is not a simple linear effect. Rather, it involves a “threshold effect,” so that increases in size above roughly 500 (in a secondary school) do not have an appreciable effect. Third, recent trends have “conspired” against youth by simultaneously producing larger schools — so that most schools are above the size threshold — and “forcing” ever larger numbers of academically marginal students into these secondary schools. This article explores these hypotheses and their significance for youth development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, G., and Verba, S. (1965).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Averch, H.,et al. (1974).How Effective Is Schooling? A Critical Review of Research Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Baird, L. (1969). Big school, small school: A critical examination of the hypothesis.J. Educ. Psychol. 60: 253–260.
Barker, R., and Gump, V. (1964).Big School, Small School: High School Size and Student Behavior Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
Barker, R., and Schoggen, P. (1973).Qualities of Community Life: Methods of Measuring Environment and Behavior Applied to an American and an English Town Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Blyth, D., Simmons, R., and Bush, D. (1978). The transition into early adolescence: a longitudinal comparison of children in two educational contexts.Sociol. Educ. 51: 149–162.
Borow, H. (1966). Development of occupational motives and roles. In Hoffman, L. W., and Hoffman, M. L. (eds.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. II, Russell Sage, New York.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). The origins of alienation. In Bronfenbrenner, U., and Mahoney, M. (eds.),Influences on Human Development Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The Ecology of Human Development Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Burkhead, J. (1967).Input and Output in Large-City High Schools Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.Y.
Burns, J. (1968). The case for small schools. Speech before the Minnesota Interim Commission on Education, April.
Buxton, C. E. (1973).Adolescents in School Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
Coleman, J. S. (1961).The Adolescent Society Free Press, New York.
Coleman, J. S., Bremer, R., Clark, B., Davis, J., Eichorn, D., Griliches, Z., Kett, J., Ryder, N., Doering, Z., and Mays, J. (1974).Youth: Transition to Adulthood University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Coleman, J. S.,et al. (1966).Equality of Educational Opportunity U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Conant, J. B. (1959).The American High School Today: A First Report to Interested Citizens McGraw-Hill, New York.
Devereaux, E. (1977). A critique of ecological psychology. Paper presented at the Conference on Research Perspectives in the Ecology of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., August 17–20.
Douvan, E., and Gold, M. (1966). Modal patterns in American adolescence. In Hoffman, L. W., and Hoffman, M. L., (eds.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. II, Russell Sage, New York.
Dreeben, R. (1968).On What Is Learned in School Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Folger, J. K., and Nam, C. B. (1967).Education of the American Population U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Ford Foundation. (1972).A Foundation Goes to School Ford Foundation, New York.
Garbarino, J. (1973). High school size and adolescent social development.Hum. Ecol. Forum 4: 26–29.
Garbarino, J. (1975a). The meaning and implications of school success.Educ. Forum 40: 157–168.
Garbarino, J. (1975b). A note on the effects of television viewing. In Bronfenbrenner, U., and Mahoney, M. (eds.),Influence on Human Development Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.
Garbarino, J. (1978a). The human ecology of school crime. In Wenk, E., (ed.),School Crime National Concil on Crime and Delinquency, Davis, Calif.
Garbarino, J. (1978b). The role of schools in socialization to adulthood.Educ. Forum 42: 169–182.
Garbarino, J., and Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The socialization of moral judgment and behavior in cross-cultural perspective. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Garbarino, J., Burston, N., Raber, S., Russel, R., and Crouter, A. (1978). The social maps of children approaching the transition from elementary to secondary school.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 417–428.
Getzels, J. W. (1974). Socialization and education: A note on discontinuities.Teachers Coll. Rec. 76: 218–225.
Glatthorn, A. A. (1969). Individual self-fulfillment in the large high school.NAASP Bull. 53 335: 47–56.
Gold, A. (1975). The resurgence of the small school in the city.Phi Delta Kappan 56: 313–315.
Gottmann, J. (1961).Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
Grabe, M. (1975). Big school, small school: Impact of the high school environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., March.
Heath, D. H. (1970). Student alienation and school.Schl. Rev. 78: 515–528.
Holland, D., Baritelle, J., and White, G. (1976). School consolidation in sparsely populated rural areas: A case study.Educ. Admin. Quart. 12: 67–69.
Jackson, J. L. (1966).School Size and Program Quality in Southern High Schools Center for Southern Education Studies, George Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville, Tenn. January.
Moos, R. (1976). Evaluating and changing community settings.Am. J. Community Psychol. 4: 313–326.
McPartland, J., and McDill, E. (1976).The Unique Role of Schools in the Causes of Youthful Crime. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Paskal, D., and Miller, W. C. (1973). Can options work in smaller school districts.NASSP Bull. 57 374: 47–54.
Plath, K. (1965).Schools Within Schools: A Study of High School Organization Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Rogoff, N. (1961). Social structure and educational selection. In Halsey, H. A., Floud, J., and Anderson, A. (eds.),Education, Economy and Society Free Press, New York.
Rosenberg, N. E. (1970). School size as a factor of school expenditure.J. Second. Educ. 45: 135–142.
Schoo, P. (1974). Optimum setting for the early adolescent: Junior high or middle school?North Cent. Assoc. Quart. 48: 340–349.
Schreiber, D. (1967).Profile of the School Dropout: A Reader on America's Major Educational Problem Random House, New York.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973).Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered Harper & Row, New York.
Turner, C., and Thrasher, M. (1970).School Size Does Make a Difference Institute for Educational Management, San Diego, Calif.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1977).Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1977 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Wicker, A. (1969). Cognitive complexity, school size and participation in school behavior settings: A test of the frequency of interaction hypothesis.J. Educ. Psychol. 60: 200–203.
Willems, E. (1967). Sense of obligation to high school activities are related to school size and marginality of student.Child Dev. 38: 1247–1260.
Willems, E. P. (1975). Relations of models to methods in behavioral ecology. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference, International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Guildford, Surrey, Eng. July 13–19.
Wilson, J. (1976). Crime in society and school.Educ. Res. 5: 3–6.
Wynne, E. (1975). Privacy and socialization to adulthood. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., March 31.
Wynne, E. (1977).Growing Up Suburban University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received his Ph.D. in human development and family studies from Cornell University. Principal interests are the ecology of human development and child welfare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garbarino, J. Some thoughts on school size and its effects on adolescent development. J Youth Adolescence 9, 19–31 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088377
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088377