Skip to main content
Log in

Some thoughts on school size and its effects on adolescent development

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What do we know about the effects of school size on adolescent development? This article addresses this issue, based on a review of the available evidence. While this evidence is sketchy, it does offer three important hypotheses to guide our efforts to understand the human ecology of adolescence. First, school size matters, particularly to academically marginal students. Second, school size is not a simple linear effect. Rather, it involves a “threshold effect,” so that increases in size above roughly 500 (in a secondary school) do not have an appreciable effect. Third, recent trends have “conspired” against youth by simultaneously producing larger schools — so that most schools are above the size threshold — and “forcing” ever larger numbers of academically marginal students into these secondary schools. This article explores these hypotheses and their significance for youth development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, G., and Verba, S. (1965).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H.,et al. (1974).How Effective Is Schooling? A Critical Review of Research Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L. (1969). Big school, small school: A critical examination of the hypothesis.J. Educ. Psychol. 60: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., and Gump, V. (1964).Big School, Small School: High School Size and Student Behavior Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., and Schoggen, P. (1973).Qualities of Community Life: Methods of Measuring Environment and Behavior Applied to an American and an English Town Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, D., Simmons, R., and Bush, D. (1978). The transition into early adolescence: a longitudinal comparison of children in two educational contexts.Sociol. Educ. 51: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borow, H. (1966). Development of occupational motives and roles. In Hoffman, L. W., and Hoffman, M. L. (eds.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. II, Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). The origins of alienation. In Bronfenbrenner, U., and Mahoney, M. (eds.),Influences on Human Development Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The Ecology of Human Development Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhead, J. (1967).Input and Output in Large-City High Schools Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1968). The case for small schools. Speech before the Minnesota Interim Commission on Education, April.

  • Buxton, C. E. (1973).Adolescents in School Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1961).The Adolescent Society Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Bremer, R., Clark, B., Davis, J., Eichorn, D., Griliches, Z., Kett, J., Ryder, N., Doering, Z., and Mays, J. (1974).Youth: Transition to Adulthood University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S.,et al. (1966).Equality of Educational Opportunity U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1959).The American High School Today: A First Report to Interested Citizens McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereaux, E. (1977). A critique of ecological psychology. Paper presented at the Conference on Research Perspectives in the Ecology of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., August 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E., and Gold, M. (1966). Modal patterns in American adolescence. In Hoffman, L. W., and Hoffman, M. L., (eds.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. II, Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben, R. (1968).On What Is Learned in School Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, J. K., and Nam, C. B. (1967).Education of the American Population U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford Foundation. (1972).A Foundation Goes to School Ford Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1973). High school size and adolescent social development.Hum. Ecol. Forum 4: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1975a). The meaning and implications of school success.Educ. Forum 40: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1975b). A note on the effects of television viewing. In Bronfenbrenner, U., and Mahoney, M. (eds.),Influence on Human Development Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1978a). The human ecology of school crime. In Wenk, E., (ed.),School Crime National Concil on Crime and Delinquency, Davis, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1978b). The role of schools in socialization to adulthood.Educ. Forum 42: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., and Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The socialization of moral judgment and behavior in cross-cultural perspective. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., Burston, N., Raber, S., Russel, R., and Crouter, A. (1978). The social maps of children approaching the transition from elementary to secondary school.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1974). Socialization and education: A note on discontinuities.Teachers Coll. Rec. 76: 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatthorn, A. A. (1969). Individual self-fulfillment in the large high school.NAASP Bull. 53 335: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. (1975). The resurgence of the small school in the city.Phi Delta Kappan 56: 313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1961).Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States Twentieth Century Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, M. (1975). Big school, small school: Impact of the high school environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., March.

  • Heath, D. H. (1970). Student alienation and school.Schl. Rev. 78: 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Baritelle, J., and White, G. (1976). School consolidation in sparsely populated rural areas: A case study.Educ. Admin. Quart. 12: 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. L. (1966).School Size and Program Quality in Southern High Schools Center for Southern Education Studies, George Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville, Tenn. January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. (1976). Evaluating and changing community settings.Am. J. Community Psychol. 4: 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPartland, J., and McDill, E. (1976).The Unique Role of Schools in the Causes of Youthful Crime. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paskal, D., and Miller, W. C. (1973). Can options work in smaller school districts.NASSP Bull. 57 374: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plath, K. (1965).Schools Within Schools: A Study of High School Organization Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, N. (1961). Social structure and educational selection. In Halsey, H. A., Floud, J., and Anderson, A. (eds.),Education, Economy and Society Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. E. (1970). School size as a factor of school expenditure.J. Second. Educ. 45: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoo, P. (1974). Optimum setting for the early adolescent: Junior high or middle school?North Cent. Assoc. Quart. 48: 340–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, D. (1967).Profile of the School Dropout: A Reader on America's Major Educational Problem Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973).Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C., and Thrasher, M. (1970).School Size Does Make a Difference Institute for Educational Management, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1977).Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1977 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. (1969). Cognitive complexity, school size and participation in school behavior settings: A test of the frequency of interaction hypothesis.J. Educ. Psychol. 60: 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E. (1967). Sense of obligation to high school activities are related to school size and marginality of student.Child Dev. 38: 1247–1260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E. P. (1975). Relations of models to methods in behavioral ecology. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference, International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Guildford, Surrey, Eng. July 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1976). Crime in society and school.Educ. Res. 5: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, E. (1975). Privacy and socialization to adulthood. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., March 31.

  • Wynne, E. (1977).Growing Up Suburban University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received his Ph.D. in human development and family studies from Cornell University. Principal interests are the ecology of human development and child welfare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garbarino, J. Some thoughts on school size and its effects on adolescent development. J Youth Adolescence 9, 19–31 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088377

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088377

Keywords

Navigation