Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

a) to examine the EuroQol instrument's ability to assess a patient's state of health prior to admission to an ICU; b) to describe a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before the onset of the condition leading to admission to the ICU, and prior to discharge; c) to compare patients' preferences for a “common core” of EuroQol health states with preferences from healthy individuals.

Design

Patients in a step-down unit (SDU) retrospectively rated their health states prior to admission to the ICU, their current states of health and the “common core” of hypothetical EuroQol states of health. Proxies rated the patients' health states prior to admission to the ICU. Patients' preferences for EuroQol states of health were compared with the preferences obtained from a retrospective cohort of healthy individuals.

Setting

An SDU at the University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.

Patients

103 critical medical and surgical patients were interviewed.

Intervention

The EuroQol questionnaire, a non-disease specific instrument to evaluate HR QoL.

Measurements and main results

Agreement between patients and proxies regarding their prior health state was moderate to good in physical and pain areas (kappa: 0.43–0.58), fair for mood (kappa: 0.38) and almost identical for prior overall health (65.9 vs 66.3). Compared with their prior HRQoL, patients had deteriorated in all physical areas and overall health at discharge from the SDU. Preferences for the worst health states varied significantly between patients and healthy individuals.

Conclusion

The EuroQol can be reliably used with proxies to determine the state of health of patients prior to admission to the ICU. Preferences between healthy individuals and ICU patients differed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thibault GE, Mulley AG, Barnett GO, et al. (1980) Medical intensive care: indications, interventions, and outcomes. N Engl J Med 302: 938–942

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Zimmermann JE, Wagner DP, et al. (1981) APACHE — acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9: 591–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovich A, et al. (1984) A simplified acute physiologic score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12: 975–977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, et al. (1985) A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights. Crit Care Med 13: 519–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Avrunin JS, et al. (1987) A comparison of methods to predict mortality of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 15: 715–722

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knaus WA, Drapper EA, Wagner DP, et al. (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13: 818–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA. (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100: 1619–1636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, et al. (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270: 2478–2486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270: 2957–2963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Gall JR, Brun-Buisson C, Trunet P, et al. (1982) Influence of age, previous health status and severity of acute illness on outcome from intensive care. Crit Care Med 10: 575–578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patrick DL, Danis M, Sutherland LI, et al. (1988) Quality of life following intensive care. J Gen Intern Med 3: 218–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vazquez-Mata G, Rivera R, Gonzalez A, et al. (1992) Factors related to quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 20: 1257–1262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tian ZM, Reis-Miranda D (1995) Quality of life after intensive care with Sickness Impact Profile. Int Care Med 21: 422–428

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein RL, Campion EW, Thibault GE, et al. (1986) Functional outcomes following medical intensive care. Crit Care Med 14: 783–788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaren B, Hedstrand U (1987) Quality of life among long-term survivors of intensive care. Crit Care Med 15: 743–747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs CJ, Van der Vliet JA, Van Roogendaal MT, et al. (1988) Mortality and quality of life after intensive care for critical illness. Intensive Care Med 14: 217–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mundt DJ, Gage RW, Lemeshow S, et al. (1989) Intensive care unit patient follow-up. Mortality, functional status and return to work at six months. Arch Inten Med 149: 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sage WM, Rosenthal MH, Silverman JF (1986) intensive care worth it? An assessment of input and outcome for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 14: 777–782

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yinnon A, Zimran A, Hershko C (1989) Quality of life and survival following intensive medical care. Quarterly J Med 71: 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK (1992) The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 45: 743–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magazmier J, Simonsick EM, Kashner M, et al. (1988) Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J Clin Epidemiol 41: 1065–1074

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarridge BR, Massagli MP (1989) The use of female spouse proxies in common symptom reporting. Med Care 27: 352–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Danis M, Patrick D, Sutherland LI, et al. (1988) Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care. JAMA 260: 797–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosser RM, Kind P (1978) A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol 7: 347–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Badia X, Fernandez E, Segura A (1995) Influence of socio-demographic and health status variables on evaluation of health states in a Spanish population. Eur J Pub Health 5: 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brooks RG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, et al. (1991) EuroQol: health-related quali ty of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy 18: 37–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  28. Williams A (1995) The role of the EuroQol instrument in QALY calculations. Discussion paper No. 130. University of York: Centre for Health Economics, 1995

  29. Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edition). Wiley, New York, pp 221–225

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA, et al. (1991) The validity of proxygenerated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care 29: 115–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nord E (1992) Methods for Quality Adjustment of Life Years. Soc Sci Med 34: 559–569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsevat J, Cook E, Green M, et al. (1995) Health values of the seriously ill. Ann Intern Med 122: 514–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC et al. (1994) Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 14: 9–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guadagnoli E, Cleary PD (1995) How consistent is patient reported pre-admission health status when collected during and after hospital stay? Med Care 33: 106–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Salut Pública de Catalunya, Pavelló Central, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Carretera de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, E-08907, Barcelona, Spain

    X. Badia

  2. Carretera de la Feixa Llarge, S/M, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, E-08907, Barcelona, Spain

    A. Díaz-Prieto

  3. Consorci Hospitalari Parc Tauli, Hospital de, Sabadell, Parc Taulí, S/M, E-08208, Sábadell, Barcelona, Spain

    M. Rué

  4. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, F-346 Health Sciences Center, SC-37, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, Washington, (US)

    D. L. Patrick

Authors
  1. X. Badia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Díaz-Prieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Rué
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. L. Patrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badia, X., Díaz-Prieto, A., Rué, M. et al. Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 22, 1379–1384 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709554

Key words

Search

Navigation