Skip to main content
Log in

Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Demographic, sexual, and personality characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of sexual arousal were compared. Subjects were 296 female students from an introductory psychology course who had volunteered for a study on sexuality and personality. After completing several questionnaires, subjects were presented with a written description of an experiment that involved viewing sexually explicit videotapes and measurement of sexual arousal with a vaginal photoplethysmograph and indicated in writing whether or not they would be interested in participating in the experiment. Chi-square analyses revealed that a greater percentage of volunteers had experienced sexual trauma and that fewer women in this group reported objections to viewing sexually explicit films than nonvolunteers. A discriminant function analysis revealed that the volunteers masturbated more frequently, had more exposure to commercialized erotica materials, were exposed to these materials at an earlier age, and reported less sexual fear than nonvolunteers. Other personality, demographic, and sexual characteristics did not differ across the groups. This study demonstrates that the external validity of studies employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal is limited. Researchers must use caution when discussing the generality of findings based on genital measurement of sexual arousal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P. R., Perry, L. B., Seeley, T. T., Seeley, D. M., and Rothblatt, A. B. (1981). Thermographic measurement of sexual arousal. A discriminant validity analysis.Arch. Sex Behav. 10: 171–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Annon, J. S. (1975).The Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Problems (Vol. 2). Enabling Systems, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. J., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 161–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, V. E., Calhoun, K., and Wolchik, S. A. (1979). Inhibiting effects of anxiety on female sexual arousal. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia.

  • Bentler, P. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment: II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamant, L. (1970). Attitude, personality and behavior in volunteers and nonvolunteers for sexual research. InProceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (Vol. 5), American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., pp. 423–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.Arch. Sex Behav. 7: 513–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., Morokoff, P., and Greenwood, P. (1974). Sexual arousal in women: The development of a measurement device for vaginal blood volume.Arch. Sex. Behav. 559–564.

  • Heiman, J. R. (1977). A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (1978). Uses of psychophysiology in the assessment and treatment of sexual dysfunction. In LoPiccolo, J., and LoPiccolo, I. (eds.),Handbook of Sex Therapy Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, C., Rubin, H. B., and Henson D. E. (1979). Women's sexual arousal concurrently assessed by three genital measures.Arch. Sex Behav. 8: 459–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, D. E., and Rubin, H. B. (1978). A comparison of two objective measures of sexual arousal of women.Behav. Res. Ther. 16: 143–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, D. E., Rubin, H. B., Henson, C., and Williams, J. R. (1973). Temperature change of the labia minora as an objective measure of human female eroticism.J. Behav. Ther. Exper. Psychiat. 8: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, D. E., Rubin, H. B., and Henson, C. (1979). Analysis of the consistency of objective measures of sexual arousal in women.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 12: 701–711.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, P. W., Wincze, J..P., and Hoon, E. F. (1976). Physiological assessment of sexual arousal in women.Psychophysiology 13: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, P. W., Wincze, J. P., and Hoon, W. F. (1977). A test of reciprocal inhibition: Are anxiety and sexual arousal in women mutually inhibitory?J. Abnorm. Psychol. 86: 65–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaats, G. R., and Davis, K. E. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitude.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., and Wilson, G. T. (1978). Criteria for evaluating psychotherapy.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 35: 407–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Stringfield, D. O., Wagenhals, W. L., Dahl, R. H., and Ransdell, H. J. (1980). Sex differences, androgyny, and approach responses to erotica: A new variation on the old volunteer problem.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 517–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanyon, (1973). Psychological screening inventory: Mammal Research Psychologists Press, Goshen, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morokoff, P. J., and Heiman, J. R. (1980). Effects of erotic stimuli on sexually functional and dysfunctional women: Multiple measures before and after sex therapy.Behav. Res. Ther. 18: 127–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1966). The development and multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of three measures of three aspects of guilt.J. Consult. Psychol. 30: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. (1973). Sex differences, sex experience, sex guilt and explicitly sexual films.J. Soc. Issues 29: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintchak, G., and Geer, J. (1975). A vaginal photoplethysmograph system.Psychophysiology 12: 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. T., and Lawson, D. M. (1978). Expectancies, alcohol, and sexual arousal in women.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87: 358–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wincze, J. P., Hoon, E. F., and Hoon, P. W. (1976). A comparison of the physiological responsivity of normal and sexually dysfunctional women during exposure to erotic stimulus.J. Psychosom Res. 20: 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincze. J. P., Hoon, P. W., and Hoon. E. F. (1977). Sexual arousal in women. A comparison of cognitive and physiological responses by continuous measurement.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 121–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wincze, J. P., Hoon, E. F., and Hoon, P. W. Multiple measure analysis of women experiencing low sexual arousal. (1978).Behav. Res. Ther. 16: 43–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolchik, S.A., Spencer, S.L. & Lisi, I.S. Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 12, 399–408 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542883

Key words

Navigation