Skip to main content
Log in

Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on sexual behavior frequently require that subject volunteers engage in intrusive/sensitive assessment procedures. While earlier investigators have found that these demands may result in volunteer bias (volunteers differing from nonvolunteers), these studies were limited to nonclinical samples. The present study involved 182 males admitted to an inpatient alcoholism rehabilitation program. Those patients who volunteered to participate in an intrusive study examining sexual functioning were dissimilar to nonvolunteers. Compared to nonvolunteers, volunteers reported a greater interest in sex, less satisfaction with sex, more concerns about sexual functioning, a greater incidence of premature ejaculation, and a greater incidence of negative sexual experience. Volunteers also had a higher MAST score, used outpatient substance-abuse counseling more often, and more frequently had a diagnosis of cocaine/amphetamine dependence and cannabis dependence. These differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers suggest a need to use caution when generalizing the results of similar studies to the overall population. Procedures that may help to minimize volunteer bias are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., APA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, R. N., Arnoldussen, B. H., and Quittner, A. M. (1984). Follow-up difficulty with substance abusers: Predictors of time to locate and relationship to outcome.Int. J. Addict. 19: 885–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1978).The Beck Depression Inventory. Center for Cognitive Therapy, Philadelphia. Beckman, L. J., and Bardsley, P. E. (1986). Individual characteristics, gender differences and dropout from alcoholism treatment,Alc. Alcoholism 21: 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L. J., and Bardsley, P. E. (1986). Individual characteristics, gender differences and dropout from alcoholism treatment.Alc. Alcoholism 21: 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L., and Meyer, J. (1979). A psychological profile of the sexual dysfunctions.Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 201–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for laboratory study of male sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 513–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F. S., and Maxwell, P. J. (1987). Predicting attendance at follow-up evaluations in alcoholism treatment outcome research.J. Stud. Alc. 48: 569–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, G., Ogborne, A. C., and Cleland, P. (1984). Factors associated with patient dropout from an outpatient alcoholism treatment service.J. Stud. Alc. 45: 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A., Funderburk, F. R., Allen, R. P., and Stefan, R. L. (1987). The characteristics of alcoholics frequently lost to follow-up.J. Stud. Alc. 48: 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, G., and Berglung, M. (1986). Successfully adjusted alcoholics lost to long-term follow-up: A prospective study.Drug Alc. Depend. 18: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekarik, G. (1983). Improvement in clients who have given different reasons for dropping out of treatment.J. Clin. Psychol. 39: 909–913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B. J., Penick, E. C., Rahaim, S., Read, M. R., and DeSouza, C. (1987). The dropout in alcoholism research: A brief report.Int. J. Addict. 22: 283–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1975).The Volunteer Subject Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, M. L. (1971). Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. The quest for a new diagnostic instrument.Am. J. Psychiat. 127: 1653–1658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobell, L. C., Maisto, S. A., Sobell, M. B., and Cooper, A. M. (1979). Reliability of alcohol abusers' self reports of drinking behavior.Behav. Res. Ther. 17: 157–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., and Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 93–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Spencer, S. L., and Lisi, I. S. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal: Demographic, sexual and personality characteristics.Arch. Sex. Behav. 12: 399–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was funded by a Veterans Administration Merit Review Grant awarded to Sudhir Bansal and John P. Wincze.

Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Roger Williams General Hospital

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nirenberg, T.D., Wincze, J.P., Bansal, S. et al. Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 20, 371–379 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542617

Key words

Navigation