Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: A review and critique

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a review and chronological perspective on the development of self-report measures designed to describe an individual's sexual functioning. It includes scales that provide data on both heterosexual and homosexual behavior. Attitude scales are also included, but only those that reflect an individual's attitudes toward his own or his partner's behavior. Two classes of self-report measures are evaluated: (1) unidimensional scales that are relatively short and restricted in the information they supply; and (2) multidimensional inventories or questionnaires that elicit a wider variety of information. Available psychometric data are provided, and the measures are critically examined from both a research and a clinical point of view. It was concluded that unidimensional scales are probably more useful for research settings, while multidimensional inventories appear to have greater potential in clinical settings. All the test instruments reviewed would benefit from refinements, and recommendations are made that additional validity studies be conducted and more normative data be provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. M., and Haupt, T. D. (1966). The Sex Inventory: Test-retest reliabilities of scale scores and items.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 375–378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, W. J., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex Behav. 4: 161–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment. I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. P., and Levitt, E. E. (1965). The scalability of sexual experiences.Psychol. Rec. 15: 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowden, J. E., and Morse, E. L. (1970). The relationship of defensiveness to responses on the Sex Inventory.J. Clin. Psychol. 26: 505–509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowden, J. E., and Pacht, A. R. (1969). The sex inventory as a classification instrument for sex offenders.J. Clin. Psychol. 25: 53–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1975).Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory. Clinical Psychometrics Research, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1978).Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (rev. ed.). Clinical Psychometrics Research, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1980). Psychological assessment of psychosexual functioning.Psychiat. Clin. N. Amer. 3: 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., and Melisaratos, N. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning.J. Sex. Marital Ther. 5: 244–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., and Meyer, J. K. (1979). A psychological profile of sexual dysfunctions.Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 201–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Melisaratos, N., and Clark, M. M. (1976a). Gender and sexual experience as determinants in sexual behavior hierarchy.J. Sex. Marital Ther. 2: 85–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Meyer, J. K., and Dupkin, C. N. (1976b). Discrimination of organic versus psychogenic impotence with the DSFI.J. Sex. Marital Ther. 2: 229–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Meyer, J. K., and Gallant, B. W. (1977). Distinctions between male and female invested partners in sexual disorders.Amer. J. Psychiat. 134: 385–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Meyer, J. K., and Vasquez, N. (1973). A psychological profile of the transsexual. I. The male.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 166: 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. P., Meyer, J. K., and Boland, P. (1981). A psychological profile of the transsexual. II. The female.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 169: 157–168.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1972). Personality and sexual behavior.J. Psychosom. Res. 16: 141–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, F. H., Nelson, J. G., Knight, W. G., and Garcia-Colberg, E. (1977). Sex, politics, and personality: A multidimensional study of college students.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 105–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., MacCulloch, M. J., Mellor, V., and Pinschof, J. M. (1966). The application of anticipatory avoidance learning to the treatment of homosexuality. III. The sexual orientation method.Behav. Res. Ther. 4: 289–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W. (1971).Measuring the Concepts of Personality. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, G. G. (1970). The Mosher Sex-Guilt Scale and the Thorne Sex Inventory: Intercorrelations.J. Clin. Psychol. 25: 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, G. G., Kaplan, B., Higgins, J. D., and Tuton, K. (1968). Subscale intercorrelations of the Sex Inventory: Males and females.J. Clin. Psychol. 24: 451–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A., Guttman, L., Suchman, E. A., Lazarsfeld, P. F., Star, S. A., and Clausen J. A. (eds.),Measurement and Prediction (vol. 4). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, J. J. M., Graham, P. J., Quinn, J. T., MacAllister, H., and Woodward, R. (1974). A questionnaire measure of sexual interest.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 357–366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, T. D., and Allen, R. M. (1966). A multivariate analysis of variance of scale scores on The Sex Inventory, male form.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 387–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, E. F., Hoon, P. W., and Wincze (1976). An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, V. C., and Brown, C. (1975). A test of the Zuckerman heterosexual scales.J. Pers. Assess. 39: 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., and Steger, J. (1974). The Sexual Interaction Inventory: A new instrument for assessment of sexual dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 585–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., and Gelder, M. G. (1967). Transvestism and fetishism. Clinical and psychological changes during faradic aversion treatment.Brit. J. Psychiat. 113: 711–729.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., and Sartorius, N. H. (1968). A contribution to the measurement of sexual attitude.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 145: 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., Gelder, M., and Bancroft, J. (1970). Sexual deviants two years after electric aversion.Brit. J. Psychiat. 117: 173–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, N. N., and D'Agostino, P. A. (1977). Factor analysis of the Sexual Interaction Inventory.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 25–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1967). On estimating psychological relationships: Social desirability and self-report.Psychol. Bull. 67: 273–293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paitich, D., Langevin, R., Freeman, R., Mann, K., and Handy, L. (1977). The Clarke SHO: A clinical sex history questionnaire for males.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 421–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podell, L., and Perkins, J. C. (1957). A Guttman scale for sexual experience—a methodoligical note.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 54: 420–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth.Psychol. Bull. 63: 129–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sallee, D. T., and Casciani, J. M (1976). Relationship between sex drive and sexual frustration and purpose in life.J. Clin. Psychol. 32: 273–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavi, R. C., Derogatis, L. R., Kuriansky, J., O'Connor, D., and Sharpe, L. (1979). The assessment of sexual function and marital interaction.J. Sex. Marital Ther. 5: 169–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, F. C. (1966a). The Sex Inventory.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 367–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, F. C. (1966b). A factorial study of sexuality in adult males.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 378–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, F. C. (1966c). Scales for rating sexual experience.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 404–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, F. C., and Haupt, T. D. (1966). The objective measurement of sex attitudes and behavior in adult males.J. Clin. Psychol. 22: 395–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1973). Scales for sex experience for males and females.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 41: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Tushup, R., and Finner, S. (1976). Sexual attitudes and experience: Attitude and personality correlates and changes produced by a course in sexuality.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 7–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, 10461, Bronx, New York, USA

    Hope R. Conte Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Hope R. Conte Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conte, H.R. Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: A review and critique. Arch Sex Behav 12, 555–576 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542217

Key words

Search

Navigation