Abstract
Given the heavy reliance on self-report measures in research on sexuality, issues surrounding nonresponse rates are of particular importance. Phone interviews were conducted with 400 adults living in a midsized midwestern city. Rates of nonresponse and reported sexual experience were analyzed as a function of the type of preface statement provided for four questions related to sexual behavior. One preface was general; the other referred to public concern over AIDS. On questions regarding number of sexual partners in the past year and involvement in extramarital sex, women who were given the AIDS preface were significantly more likely to answer the questions than were women who received the general preface. However, for both men and women, reported rates of sexual experience did not differ as a function of the preface statement. Differences between responders and nonresponders were explored. Men were more likely to respond to the sexual items. Education, age, marital status, and religious affiliation were unrelated to rates of response to the sexual questions. For men, responders to the sexuality items reported greater yearly incomes than did nonresponders. Some differences in reported sexual behavior were also found between responders and nonresponders; nonresponders consistently reported less sexual experience. Implications for research on sexuality and future investigation of factors affecting response to sexual items are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allgeier, E. R., and Allgeier, A. R. (1991).Sexual Interactions 3rd ed., D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
Andersen, B., and Broffitt, B. (1988). Is there a valid and reliable self-report measure of sexual behavior?Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 509–524.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., Blair, E., and Stocking, C. (1978). Question threat and response bias.Public Opinion Quart. 42: 221–234.
Catania, J. A. (1990). The AIDS epidemic: Quantitative assessment in human sexuality research. In Chouinard, A. and Albert, J. (eds.),Human Sexuality: Research Perspectives in a World Facing AIDS The International Development and Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 69–91.
Catania, J., Gibson, D., Marin, B., Coates, T., and Greenblatt, R. (1990). Response bias in assessing sexual behaviors relevant to HIV transmission.Eval. Prog. Plann. 13: 19–29.
Catania, J. A., McDermott, L. J., and Pollack, L. M. (1986). Questionnaire response bias and face-to-face interview sample bias in sexuality research.J. Sex Res. 22: 52–72.
Clement, U. (1990). Surveys of heterosexual behavior. In Bancroft, J., Davis, C. M., and Weinstein, D. (eds.),Annual Review of Sex Research The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Mt. Vernon, IA, pp. 45–74.
DeLamater, J., and MacCorquodale, P. (1975). The effects of interview schedule variations on reported sexual behavior.Sociol. Methods Res. 4: 215–236.
DeLamater, J., and MacCorquodale, P. (1979).Premarital Sexuality: Attitudes, Relationships, Behavior University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Farkas, G., Sine, L., and Evans, I. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 513–520.
Herold, E., and Way, L. (1988). Sexual self-disclosure among university women.J. Sex Res. 24, 1–14.
Johnson, R. E. (1970). Extramarital sexual intercourse: A methodological note.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 279–282.
Johnson, W., and DeLamater, J. (1976). Response effects in sex surveys.Public Opinion Quart. 40: 165–181.
Kaats, G., and Davis, K. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.
Klecka, W., and Tuchfarber, A. (1978). Random-digit dialing: A comparison to personal surveys.Public Opinion Quart. 42: 105–114.
Lavrakas, P. (1987). Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection and Supervision. InApplied Social Research Series, 7 Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Morokoff, P. J. (1986). Volunteer bias in the psychophysiological study of female sexuality.J. Sex Res. 22: 35–51.
Nirenberg, T. D., Wincz, J. P., Bansal, S., Liepman, M. R., Engle-Friedman, M., and Begin, A. (1991). Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 20: 371–379.
Rodgers, J. (1982). The recission of behaviors: Inconsistent responses in adolescent sexuality data.Soc. Sci. Res. 11: 280–296.
Rogers, T. (1976). Interviews by telephone and in person: Quality of responses and field performance.Public Opinion Quart. 40: 51–65.
Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. (1969). The volunteer subject. In Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. (eds.),Artifact in Behavioral Research Academic Press, New York.
Saunders, D., Fisher, W., Hewitt, E., and Clayton, J. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 1703–1712.
Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1974).Response Effects in Surveys Aldine, Chicago, IL.
Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1983).Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Wolchik, S., Braver, S., and Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 93–107.
Wolchik, S., Spencer, S., and Lisi, I. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal.Arch. Sex. Behav. 12: 399–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiederman, M.W., Weis, D.L. & Allgeier, E.R. The effect of question preface on response rates to a telephone survey of sexual experience. Arch Sex Behav 23, 203–215 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542099
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542099