Skip to main content
Log in

Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences were examined in volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual arousal. Subjects were 108 participants in a questionnaire study entitled “Personality and Sexuality,” who were then asked to volunteer for a second study which necessitated watching sexually explicit films, being partially undressed in an experimental chamber, and having penile diameter measured via a strain gauge device. Volunteers for the second study were found to be less guilty, less sexually fearful, more sexually experienced, and older than nonvolunteers. Volunteers also reported a higher incidence of past erectile difficulties and tended to be White or of mixed racial heritage, as opposed to being Oriental. Other personality variables did not discriminate between the two groups. The results indicate that future research in human sexuality using the laboratory analytic method must impose strict limits on generalization from the research data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annon, J. S. (1975).The Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Problems, Vol. 2, Enabling Systems, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, W. J., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 161–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. P., and Levitt, E. E. (1965). The scalability of sexual experience.Psychol. Rec. 15: 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1966).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamant, L. (1970). Attitude, personality and behavior in volunteers and nonvolunteers for sexual research. InProceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Vol. 5, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 423–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B. G., and Eysenck, H. J. (1968). The measurement of psychoticism: A study of factor stability and reliability.Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 7: 286–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1978). The effects of distraction, performance demand, stimulus explicitness, and personality on objective and subjective measures of male sexual arousal.Behav. Res. Ther., in press.

  • Higginbotham, H. N., and Farkas, G. M. (1977). Basic and applied research in human sexuality: Current limitations and future directions in sex therapy. In Fischer, J., and Gochros, H. (eds.),Handbook of Behavior Therapy with Sexual Problems, Vol. I:General Procedures, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. T., and DeLamater, J. D. (1976). Response effects in sex surveys.Pub. Opin. Q. 40: 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaats, G. R., and Davis, K. E. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitude.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M., and Marcuse, F. L. (1958). Characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers in psychological experimentation.J. Consult. Psychol. 22: 475–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H., and Sakoda, J. (1952). Volunteer-error in the Kinsey study.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 47: 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966).Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1966). The development and multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of three measures of three aspects of guilt.J. Consult. Psychol. 30: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. (1973). Sex differences, sex experience, sex guilt, and explicitly sexual films.J. Soc. Issues 29: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1965). The volunteer subject.Hum. Relations 18: 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1975).The Volunteer Subject Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. W. (1956). Responses to a personality questionnaire by volunteers and nonvolunteers to a Kinsey interview.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 52: 280–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farkas, G.M., Sine, L.F. & Evans, I.M. Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 7, 513–520 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541919

Key words

Navigation