Skip to main content
Log in

Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the brief index of sexual functioning for women

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous self-report measures of female sexual function have been either overly restrictive or inappropriate for use in large-scale clinical trials. Accordingly, we have developed the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF-W), a 22-item, self-report instrument for the assessment of current levels of female sexual functioning and satisfaction. The BISF-W was administered at monthly intervals to a standardization sample of 269 women, ages 20–73 years. A principal components analysis yielded a three-factor solution—interest/desire, sexual activity, and satisfaction—which accounted for 51.2% of the variance. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by means of a comparison with the Derogatis Sexual Function Inventory. In addition, the BISF-W was compared to the Brief Sexual Function Questionnaire, a similar self-report measure of sexual functioning for men. Major advantages of the BISF-W are its ease of administration and scoring, suitability for use in both clinical and nonclinical samples, and assessment of key dimensions of female sexuality. However, based on its moderate test—retest reliability and internal consistency, further development of the instrument is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. L., and Broffit, B. (1988). Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual behavior?Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 509–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. L. Broffit, B., Karlsson, J. A., and Turnquist, D. C. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Sexual Arousability Index.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 123–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. (1989). Man and his penis—a relationship under threat?J. Psychol. Hum. Sex. 2(2): 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment—II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, H. R. (1983). Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: A review and critique.Arch. Sex. Behav. 12: 555–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croog, S. H., Levine, S., Sudilovsky, A., Baume, R. M., and Clive, J. (1988). Sexual symptoms in hypertensive patients. A clinical trial of antihypertensive medications.Arch. Int. Med. 148: 788–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croog, S. H., Levine, S., Testa, M. A., Brown, B., Bulpitt, J. C., Jenkins, C. D., Klerman, G. L., and Williams, G. H. (1986). The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.New Engl. J. Med. 314: 1657–1664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., and Melisaratos, N. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning.J. Sex Marital Ther. 5: 244–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R., and Rowland, D. L. (1983). Affective and physiological sexual response patterns: The effects of instructions on sexually functional and dysfunctional men.J. Psychosom. Res. 27: 105–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, E. F., Hoon, P. W., and Wincze, J. P. (1976). An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. R., Reynolds, C. F. III, Thase, M. E., Frank, E., Jennings, J. R., Houck, P. R., Berman, S., Jacobs, E., and Kupfer, D. J. (1987). Assessment of sexual function, interest and activity in depressed men.J. Affect. Disord. 13: 61–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W., Harrison, D. F., and Crosscup, P. C. (1981). A short-form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships.J. Sex Res. 17: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. R. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy.Psychometrika 35: 401–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., and Steger, J. C. (1974). The Sexual Interaction Inventory: A new instrument for assessment of sexual dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 585–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, B. A. (1978). A reader's, writer's, and reviewer's guide to assessing research reports in clinical psychology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 835–838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.J. Clin. Psychol. 38: 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. F. III, Frank, E., Thase, M. E., Houck, P. R., Jennings, J. R., Howell, J. R., Lilienfeld, S. O., and Kupfer, D. J. (1988). Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent, and healthy men: Factor analysis of a Brief Sexual Function Questionnaire for men.Psychiat. Res. 24: 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. C., and Beck, J. G. (1988).Patterns of Sexual Arousal, New York, Guilford.

  • Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R., and Bachmann, G. A. (1993). Prevalence of sexual dysfunctional in women: Results of a survey study of 329 women in an outpatient gynecological clinic.J. Sex Marital Ther. 19: 171–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical and feminist criticisms of “the human sexual response cycle” model.Ann. Rev. Sex Res. 2: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassertheil-Smoller, S., Oberman, A., Blaufox, M. D., Davis, B., and Langford, H. (1992). The trial of antihypertensive interventions and management (TAIM) study.Am. J. Hypertens. 5: 37–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., and Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 93–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1973). Scales for sex experience for males and females.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 41: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, J.F., Rosen, R.C. & Leiblum, S.R. Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the brief index of sexual functioning for women. Arch Sex Behav 23, 627–643 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541816

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541816

Key words

Navigation