Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-specific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a larger longitudinal study of psychosocial development, 148 girls and 130 boys were administered a series of questions regarding a close friend during their eighth-grade school year. Scales corresponding to shared experience, self-disclosure, and intimacy (defined as emotional closeness) were developed from these items. Path-analytic models tested the relative strength of the self-disclosure and shared experience paths to emotional closeness for boys and girls separately. The results indicated that the self-disclosure path to emotional closeness is significant for both boys and girls. No relationship was found between shared experience and emotional closeness in girls when controlling for self-disclosure. The relationship between shared experience and feelings of closeness was, however, significant for boys even while controlling for the effects of self-disclosure. Covariance structure analysis (LISREL) indicated that the covariance matrices for the three scales were significantly different for boys and girls. The results are considered in relation to the gender socialization and friendship literature. The potential importance of defining intimacy as emotional closeness is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I., and Taylor, D. A. (1973).Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1968). Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects.Hum. Dev. 11: 145–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence.Child Dev. 53: 1447–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, D., Hill, J. P., and Thiel, K. S. (1982). Early adolescents' significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and nonfamilial adults and young people.J. Youth Adoles. 11: 425–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, R. (1976).Friends and Lovers, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, L., Losoff, M., and Petersen, A. C. (1984). Perceptions of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence.J. Early Adoles. 4: 155–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, R. M., and Berndt, T. J. (1982). Children's knowledge of a best friend: Fact or fancy?Dev. Psychol. 18: 787–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E., and Adelson, J. (1966).The Adolescent Experience, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasteau, M. F. (1974).The Male Machine, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. L., and Narus, L. R. (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same sex relationships.Psychol. Women Quart. 5: 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices.Sociol. Meth. Res. 11: 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F. T., and Youniss, J. (1982). Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence.Dev. Psychol. 18: 806–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., and Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 29: 115–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1981). The bases of a science of interpersonal relationships. In Duck, S., and Gilmour, R. (eds.),Personal Relationships 1: Studying Personal Relationships, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., and Petersen, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley, H. H. (ed.),Close Relationships, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. R. (1983).Leisure, Identity, and Interactions, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J. (1976). Sex differences in the games children play.Soc. Probl. 23: 478–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. J. (1976). Adolescent intimacy.Adolescence 11: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. C. (1984). The early adolescence study: An overview.J. Early Adoles. 4: 103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. H., Boxer, A. M., Petersen, A. C., and Albrecht, R. (1990). Relation of weight to body image in pubertal girls and boys from two communities.Dev. Psychol. 26: 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, M. H., and Richey, H. W. (1980). The significance of best friend relationships in adolescence.Psychol. Schools 17: 536–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems.Psychol. Bull. 64: 92–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharabany, R., Gershoni, R., and Hofman, J. E. (1981). Girlfriend, boyfriend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendships.Dev. Psychol. 17: 800–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953).The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH30252/38142 to Anne C. Petersen.

Research interests include the development of the self-sytem and close relationships during adolescence and young adulthood.

Research interests include adolescent mental health and parent and peer relationships.

Received Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1973. Research interest is biopsychosocial development in adolescence, with a focus on sex differences in mental health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camarena, P.M., Sarigiani, P.A. & Petersen, A.C. Gender-specific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 19, 19–32 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539442

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539442

Keywords

Navigation