Abstract
This study was undertaken to clarify developmental relationships between intrapsychic object relations structure and ego identity status during late adolescence; one purpose was to examine the possible predictive relationship between initial attachment style and later identity status. A total of 76 subjects (41 females and 35 males) who had been given the Marcia Ego Identity Status Interview and the Hansburg Separation Anxiety Test (SAT) as first-year university students in 1984 were reassessed two years later. Fitted log linear models indicated strong links between attachment style and identity status in 1986, and between identity status in 1984 and 1986; only an indirect connection existed between attachment style in 1984 and 1986 as measured by the SAT. When 1984 and 1986 identity status were known, it was possible to predict 1986 attachment style without knowing 1984 attachment style; 1984 attachment style alone was unable to predict later identity status accurately.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, S. L. (1982). The lower age boundaries of identity development.Child Develop. 53: 1551–1556.
Bishop, Y. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Black, H. M. (1981). Trait anxiety and separation distress: An analysis of two measures in parents and their adolescent children.Dissert. Abstr. Int. 42B: 2042 B (University Microfilms No. 8124381).
Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence.Psychoanal. Study Child 22: 162–186.
Chapman, J. W., and Nicholls, J. G. (1976). Occupational identity status, occupational preference, and field dependence in Maori and Pakeha boys.J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 7: 61–72.
Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening common chi-square tests.Biometrics 10: 417–451.
Currie, P. S. (1983). Current attachment patterns, attachment history, and religiosity as predictors of ego-identity status in fundamentalist Christian adolescents.Dissert. Abstr. Int. 44B: 1955 (University Microfilms No. DA8323811).
Dale, J. R. (1983). Statistical methods for ordered categorical responses and sparse contingency tables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Dale, J. R. (1986). Asymptotic normality of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse product multinomials.J. Royal Statis. Soc. B 48: 48–59.
Davidson, S. D. (1978). The level of differentiation of ego functioning in the identity achieved and identity foreclosed statuses.Dissert. Atstr. Int. 39B (University Microfilms No. 7819730).
Erikson, E. H. (1963).Childhood and Society (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity, Youth, and Crisis. W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., New York.
Esman, A. H. (1980). Adolescent psychopathology and the rapprochement phenomenon. In Feinstein, S. C., Giovacchini, P. C., Looney, J. C., Schwartzberg, A. Z., and Sorosky, A. D. (eds.),Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Fienberg, S. E. (1979). The use of chi-squared statistics for categorical data problems.J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 41: 54–64.
Fitch, S. A., and Adams, G. R. (1983). Ego identity and intimacy status: Replication and extension.Develop. Psychol. 19: 839–845.
Goodman, L. A. (1971). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for model building for multiple classifications.Technometrics 13: 33–61.
Haberman, S. J. (1977). Log-linear models and frequency tables with small expected cell counts.Ann. Statist. 5: 1148–1169.
Hansburg, H. G. (1980a).Adolescent Separation Anxiety: A Method for the Study of Adolescent Separation Problems (Vol. 1). Robert E. Krieger, New York.
Hansburg, H. C. (1980b).Adolescent Separation Anxiety: Separation Disorders (Vol. 2). Robert E. Krieger, New York.
Haslett, S. J. (1985). An algorithm for degree of freedom calculations in sparse complete contingency tables. In Gilchrist, R., Francis, B., and Whittaker, J. (eds.),Generalized Linear Models: Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Haslett, S. J. (1986). Automatic model selection for complete contingency tables.N. Zeal. Statis. 21: 26–34.
Isay, R. A. (1980). Late adolescence: The second separation stage of adolescence. In Greenspan, S. I., and Pollock, (eds.,The Course of Life: Psychoanalytic Contributions Toward Understanding Personality Development (Vol. II). National Institute of Mental Health, Washington, D.C.
Jordan, D. (1970). Parental antecedents of ego identity formation. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Jordan, D. (1971). Parental antecedents and characteristics of ego identity statuses. Unpublished doctoral dissertaiton, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Josselson, R. (1980). Ego development in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (ed.),Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Wiley, New York.
Josselson, R. (1982). Personality structure and identity status in women viewed through early memories.J. Youth Adoles. 11: 293–299.
Kiiveri, H., and Speed, T. P. (1982). Structural analysis of multivariate data: A review. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.)Sociological Methodology, 1982. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Koehler, K. J. (1986). Goodness-of-fit tests for log linear models in sparse contingency tables.J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 81: 483–493.
Kroger, J. (1985). Separation-individuation and ego identity status in New Zealand university students.J. Youth Adoles. 14: 133–147.
Lin, S. P. (1982). Algorithm AS 185. Automatic model selection in contingency tables.J. Royal Statist. Soc. Appl. Statist. 31: 317–326.
Lin, S. P. (1984). Automatic model selection in contingency tables. SAS Commun. 10(2): 22–25.
Lipschutz, S. (1966).Finite Mathematics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mahler, M., Pine, F., and Bergman, A. (1975).The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant. Basic Books, New York.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 3: 551–558.
Marcia, J. E. (1976a). Studies in ego identity. Unpublished research monograph, Simon Fraser University.
Marcia, J. E. (1976b). Identity six years after: a follow-up study.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 145–160.
Matteson, D. R. (1974). Alienation vs. exploration and commitment: Personality and family corollaries of adolescent identity statuses. Rapport fra Projekt for Ungdomsforskring. Royal Danish School of Educational Studies, Copenhangen.
McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1983).Generalised Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.
Meilman, P. W. (1979). Cross-sectional age changes in ego identity status during adolescence.Develop. Psychol. 15: 230–231.
Orlofsky, J., and Frank, M. (1986). Personality structure as viewed through early memories and identity status in college men and women.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 580–586.
Podd, M. H., Marcia, J. E., and Rubin, B. M. (1970). The effects of ego identity and partner perception on a prisoner's dilemma game.J. Social Psychol. 82: 117–126.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1982).SAS User's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables.J. Royal Statist. Soc. B, 13: 238–241.
Waterman, A. S., and Goldman, J. A. (1976). A longitudinal study of ego identity development at a liberal arts college.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 361–369.
Waterman, A. S., Geary, P. S., and Waterman, C. K. (1974). Longitudinal study of changes in ego identity status from the freshman to the senior year at college.Develop. Psychol. 10: 387–392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Internal Research Committee, Victoria University of Wellington.
Received Ph.D. in Child Development from the Florida State University. Current research interest is identity formation from a life-span perspective.
Received Ph.D. in Mathematical Statistics from Victoria University of Wellington. Among current research interests is the analysis of sparse contingency tables.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kroger, J., Haslett, S.J. Separation-individuation and ego identity status in late adolescence: A two-year longitudinal study. J Youth Adolescence 17, 59–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538724
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538724