Skip to main content
Log in

Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous empirical research suggests that problem discovery is an important step in the creative process. The present investigation was conducted to examine the role of problem discovery in the divergent thinking and creative performance of adolescents. Three divergent thinking tests were administered to a group of adolescents. Each test contained three presentedproblems and one discoveredproblem. The discovered problem allowed the adolescents to think of a problem and then to provide solutions. Comparisons indicated that the adolescents generated significantly more responses to the discovered problems than the presented problems. Most important was that the unique variance of the discovered problems (controlling the variance shared with scores from the presented problems) was reliable and significantly related to five indices of creative performance. These results support the componential theory of divergent thinking and creativity, and are consistent with the developmental view of problem finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, R. S., and Runco, M. A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (eds.).Conceptions of Giftedness. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1983).Psychological Testing, 5th ed. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlin, P. K. (1975). Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage?Develop. Psychol. 11: 602–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Stein, B. S. (1984).The Ideal Problem Solver. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Getzels, J. W. (1970). Concern for discovery: An attitudinal component of creative production.J. Personal. 38: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists.J. Personal. and Social. Psychol. 19: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E., and Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness.Gifted Child Quart. 28: 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions.J. Creative Behav. 9: 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity.Intelligence 4: 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. T. (1985). The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem-discovery process: A study of creative and noncreative middle school students.Res. Teaching English 19: 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, S. V., and Baum, S. M. (1985). The validity of the measurement of originality.Educat. Psychol. Meas. 45: 939–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition.Phi Delta Kappan 60: 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests.Percept. Motor Skills 59: 711–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement.Percept. Motor Skills 61: 1075–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986a). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children.Psychol. Schools 23: 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986b). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children.Educat. Psychol. Meas. 46: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986c). Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking.J. Psychol. 120: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986d). The discriminant validity of gifted children's divergent thinking test scores.Gifted Child Quart. 30: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creativity in gifted and nongifted children.Gifted Child Quart. 31: 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. F. (1985). Towards creativity: Problem finding in a divergent-thinking exercise.Child Study J. 15: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965).Modes of Thinking in Young Children. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969).The Talented Student. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received Ph.D. in Cognitive Psychology from the Claremont Graduate School. Research interests include the psychometrics of creativity and giftedness, and the developmental antecedents of eminence and genius.

Current interests include gifted children and creativity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Runco, M.A., Okuda, S.M. Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. J Youth Adolescence 17, 211–220 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538162

Keywords

Navigation