Abstract
The beliefs of 107 teachers who students have for mathematics the last year of elementary school are compared to the beliefs of 64 teachers the same students have for mathematics the first year of junior high school. As hypothesized, posttransition teachers trust students less, believe more strongly in controlling and disciplining students, and have a weaker sense of teaching efficacy than do pretransition teachers. There are no significant differences in beliefs about the nature of ability as a fixed trait. It is suggested that societal stereotypes about early adolescents may flourish in school settings that are exclusively for that age group, so that teachers believe these students are unlikely to make much academic progress and must be controlled.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. G. (1968).Bureaucracy in Education. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
Andrews, B. J. (1973).Relationships between selected community variables and school atmosphere. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., and Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Report No. R-2007-LAUSD, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA: (ED 140 432.)
Ashton, P. (1985). Motivation and the teacher's sense of efficacy. In Ames, C., and Ames, R. (eds.).Research on Motivation in Education, Vol. 2: The Classroom Milieu. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Ashton, P. T., and Webb, R. B. (1986).Making a Difference: Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement. Longman, New York.
Ashton, P. T., and Webb, R. B. (1982). Teachers' sense of efficacy: Toward an ecological model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Ashton, P. T., Olejnik, S., Crocker, L., and McAuliffe, M. (1982, March). Measurement problems in the study of teachers' sense of efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. B., and Doda, N. (1983).A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Florida University, Gainesville, FL: (ED 231 833.)
Barfield, V., and Burlingame, M. (1974).The pupil control ideology of teachers in selected schools.J. Exp. Educ. 42: 6–11.
Beady, C. H., Jr., and Hanseil, S. (1981). Teacher race and expectations for student achievement.Am. Educ. Res. J. 18: 191–206.
Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., and Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. 7: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Report No. R-1589/7-HEW, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Bloom, B. S. (1978). New views of the learner: Implications for instruction and curriculum.Ed. Leader. 35: 563–576.
Blyth, D. A., Simmons, R. G., and Carlton-Ford, S. (1983). The adjustment of early adolescents to school transitions.J. Early Adoles. 3: 105–120.
Brenneman, O. N., Willower, D. J., and Lynch, P. D. (1975). Teacher self-acceptance, acceptance of others, and pupil control ideology.J. Exp. Educ. 44: 14–17.
Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., and Wisenbaker, J. (1979).School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools C0an Make a Difference. Praeger, New York.
Brooks, R. C. (1977). A study to establish behavioral and other correlates of the Pupil Control Ideology form at the junior and senior high school level.Dissert. Abst. Int. 38: 1762A-1763A.
Brophy, J., and Evertson, C. (1977).Learning from Teaching: A Developmental Perspective. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Brophy, J. E., and Good, T. (1974). Teacher behaviors and student learning in second and third grades. In Borich, G. D. (ed.),The Appraisal of Teaching: Concepts and Process. Addison-Wesley, MA.
Brown, R., and Gibson, S. (1982). Teachers' sense of efficacy: Changes due to experience. Summary of a presentation at the California Educational Research Association Conference, Sacramento, CA.
Budzik, J. M. (1971). The relationship between teachers' ideology of pupil control and their perception of administrative control style.Dissert. Abstr. Int. 32: 1212A.
Cooper, H. M., and Baron, R. M. (1977). Academic expectations and attributed responsibility as predictors of professional teachers' reinforcement behavior.J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 409–418.
deCharms, R. (1976).Enhancing Motivation: Change in the Classroom. Irvington, New York.
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., and Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence.J. Educ. Psychol. 73: 642–650.
DeVita, J. C., Pumerantz, P., and Wilklow, L. B. (1970).The Effective Middle School. Parker, West Nyack, NY.
Duncan, M. J., and Biddle, B. J. (1974).The Study of Teaching. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Dusek, J. (ed.). (1985).Teacher Expectancies. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Eccles, J., and Midgley, C. (in press). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In Ames, R. E., and Ames, C. (eds.),Research on Motivation in Education (Vol. 3). Academic Press, New York.
Eccles, J., and Wigfield, A. (1985). Teacher expectations and student motivation. In Dusek, J. (ed.),Teacher Expectancies. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Eccles, J., Midgley, C., and Adler, T. F. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In Nicholls, J. G. (ed.),Advances in Motivation and Achievement. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Edmonds, R. (1984). School effects and teacher effects.Social Policy 15, 37–39.
Epstein, H. T. (1978). Growth spurts during brain development: Implications for educational policy and practice. In Chall, J. S., and Mirsky, A. F. (eds.),Education and the Brain: The Seventy-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Feldlaufer, H., and Midgley, C. (1987, April). Student, teacher, and observer perceptions of the classroom environment before and after the transition to junior high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Finger, J. A., and Silverman, M. (1966). Changes in academic performance in the junior high school.Person. Guid. J. 45: 157–164.
Fuller, B., and Izu, J. A. (1986). Explaining school cohesion: What shapes the organizational beliefs of teachers?Am. J. Educ. 94: 501–535.
Gibson, S., and Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 569–582.
Glickman, C. D., and Tamashiro, R. T. (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving.Psychol. Schools 19: 558–562.
Good, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research.Educ. Leader. 38: 415–422.
Gossen, H. A. (1969). An investigation of the relationship between socioeconomic status of elementary schools and pupil control ideology of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Green, L., and Foster, D. (1986). Classroom intrinsic motivation: Effects of scholastic level, teacher orientation, and gender.J. Educ. Res. 80: 34–39.
Guskey, T. R. (1981a). Differences in teachers' perceptions of the causes of positive vs. negative student achievement outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Guskey, T. R. (1981b). Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom.J. Teacher Educ. 32: 44–51.
Guskey, T. R. (1982). The effects of change in instructional effectiveness on the relationship of teacher expectations and student achievement.J. Educ. Res. 75: 345–348.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Hamil, P. A. (1971). An analysis of the observed change in the student-teachers' pupil control ideology as compared to the pupil control ideology of the cooperating teacher.Dissert. Abst. Int. 33: 646A.
Hawkins, J. A., and Berndt, T. J. (1985, April). Adjustment following the transition to junior high school. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
Hedberg, J. D. (1973). Pupil control ideology of middle school teachers and its relationship to student alienation and to selected organizational and teacher variables.Dissert. Abst. Int. 34: 1024A-1025A.
Heinman, R. J. (1971). Relationships among selected values, levels of dogmatism, and pupil control ideologies of high school principals.Dissert. Abstr. Int. 32: 5498A, 5499A.
Helsel, A. R. (1971a). Status obeisance and pupil control ideology.J. Educ. Admin. 9: 38–47.
Helsel, A. R. (1971b). Value orientation and pupil control ideology of public school educators.Educ. Admin. Quart. 7: 24–33.
Holmbeck, G. N., and Hill, J. P. (1986, March). Beliefs in storm and stress notions of adolescence: Prevalence and developmental antecedents. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Madison, WI.
Hoy, W. K. (1967). Organizational socialization: The student teacher and pupil control ideology.J. Educ. Res. 61: 153–155.
Hoy, W. K. (1968). The influence of experience on the beginning teacher.School Rev. 76: 312–323.
Hoy, W. K. (1969). Pupil control ideology and organizational socialization: A further examination of the influence of experience on the beginning teacher.School Rev. 77: 257–265.
Hoy, W. K. (1972). Dimensions of student alienation and pupil control orientations of high schools.Interchange 3: 38–52.
Hoy, W. K., and Kupersmith, W. J. (1984, April). The concept of trust: An empirical assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Jones, T. E. (1969). The relationship between bureaucracy and the pupil control ideology of secondary school and teachers.Dissert. Abst. Int. 31: 3818A.
Jury, L. E., Willower, D. J., and DeLacy, W. J. (1975). Teacher self-actualization and pupil control ideology.Alberta J. Educ. Res. 21: 295–301.
Keffe, J. A. (1969). The relationship of the pupil control ideology of teachers to key personal and organizational variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Lavigne, J. V. (1977). The pediatric hospital staffs knowledge of normal adolescent development.J. Pediat. Psychol. 2: 98–100.
Lawler, E. E. (1976). Control systems in organizations. In Dunnette, M. D. (ed.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago.
Leacock, E. B. (1969).Teaching and Learning in City Schools. Basic Books, New York.
Leppert, E., and Hoy, W. K. (1972). Teacher personality and pupil control ideology.J. Exp. Educat. 40: 57–59.
Levy, G. (1970).Ghetto School: Class Warfare in an Elementary School. Pegasus, New York.
Lipsitz, J. S. (1977).Growing Up Forgotten: A Review of Research and Programs Concerning Early Adolescence. Heath, Lexington, MA.
Lipsitz, J. S. (1980). The age group. In Johnson, M. (ed.),Toward Adolescence: Seventy-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Marshall, H. H., and Weinstein, R. S. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations: An interactional model.Rev. Educ. Res. 54: 301–325.
McArthur, J. T. (1978). What does teaching do to teachers?Educ. Admin. Quart. 14: 89–103.
McBride, A. P. (1972). A comparative study of a group of New Jersey middle schools and junior high schools in relation to their pupil control ideology and select pupil behaviors.Dissert. Abst. Int. 33: 1371A.
Medway, F., and Baron, R. (1977). Locus of control and tutor's instructional style as determinants of cross-age tutoring effectiveness.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2: 298–310.
Mergendoller, J. R. (1982, April). To facilitate or impede? The impact of selected organizational features of secondary schools on adolescent development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Metz, M. H. (1978).Classrooms and Corridors: The Crisis of Authority in Desegregated Secondary Schools. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Murray, H. B., and Staebler, B. K. (1974). Teacher's locus of control and student achievement gains.J. School Psychol. 12: 305–309.
Nottelmann, E. (1987). Competence and self-esteem during transition to adolescence.Develop. Psychol. 23: 441–450.
Oakes, J. (1981). Tracking policies and practices: School by school summaries. A Study of Schooling: Technical Report No. 25. University of California Graduate School of Education, Los Angeles, CA.
Offer, D., Ostrov, E., and Howard, K. I. (1981). The mental health professional's concept of the normal adolescent.Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 38: 149–153.
Passe, J. (1984). The relationship between teacher morale, teacher perceived efficacy and student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Petersen, A., Ebata, A., and Graber, J. (1987, April). Responses to developmental and family changes in early adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Porter, L. W., and Lawler, E. E. (1965). Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior.Psychol. Bull. 64: 23–51.
Power, C. (1981). Changes in students' attitudes toward science in the transition between Australian elementary and secondary schools.J. Res. Sci. Teaching, 18: 33–39.
Rafalides, M., and Hoy, W. K. (1971). Student sense of alienation and pupil control orientation of high schools.High School J. 55: 101–111.
Roberts, R. A., and Blankenship, J. W. (1970). The relationship between the change in pupil control ideology of student teachers and student teachers' perception of the cooperating teacher's pupil control ideology.J. Res. Sci. Teaching, 7: 315–320.
Rose, J. S., and Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers' beliefs in their control over student outcomes.J. Educ. Res. 74: 185–190.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., and Smith, A. (1979).Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Selove, R. (1984). Relationships among teachers' expectations and school organizational variables. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
Showers, B. K. (1980). Self-efficacy as a predictor of teacher participation in school decision making.Dissert. Abst. Int. 41: 3496A.
Silberman, C. E. (1970).Crisis in the Classroom. Random House, New York.
Simmons, R. G., and Blyth, D. A. (1987).Moving into Adolescence: The Impact of Pubertal Change and School Context. Aldine de Gruyler, Hawthorn, NY.
Simmons, R. G., Blyth, D. A., Van Cleave, E. F., and Bush, D. (1979). Entry into early adolescence: The impact of school structure, puberty, and early dating on self-esteem.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 948–967.
Sprintall, N. A. (1985). Early adolescents and opportunities for growth in the 1980s: Ships passing in the night, again.J. Early Adoles. 5: 533–547.
Trentham, L., Silvern, S., and Brogdon, R. (1985). Teacher efficacy and teacher competency ratings.Psychol. Schools 22: 343–352.
Waple, C. C. (1974). Relationship between existence of “ressentiment,” students' perception of internal-external control, and pupil control ideology of certificated high school staff in selected Ohio public schools.Dissert. Abs. Int. 35: 1939-A.
Ward, B. A. Mergendoller, J. R., and Tikunoff, W. J. (1982). Introduction to the Junior High School Transition Study.J. Early Adoles. 4: 311–317.
Williams, M. (1972). The pupil control idology of public school personnel and its relationship to specified personal and situational variables.Dissert. Abst. Int. 33: 3237A-3238A.
Willower, D. J. (1969). Schools as organizations: Some illustrated strategies for educational research and practice.J. Educ. Admin. 7: 110–126.
Willower, D. J. (1977). Schools and pupil control. In Erickson, D. A. (ed.),Educational Organization and Administration. McCutcheon, Berkeley, CA.
Willower, D. J., and Jones, R. G. (1967). Control in an educational organization. In Rath, J. D., Pancella, J., and VanNess, J. (eds.),Studying Teaching, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Willower, D. J., and Landis, C. A. (1970). Pupil control ideology and professional orientation of school faculty.J. Second. Educ. 45: 118–123.
Willower, D. J., and Lawrence, J. D. (1979). Teachers' perceptions of student threat to teacher status and teacher pupil control ideology.Psychol. Schools 16: 586–590.
Willower, D. J., Eidell, T. L., and Hoy, W. K. (1973). The school and pupil control ideology.Pennsylvania State Studies Monograph. No. 24, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
Yuskiewicz, V. D., and Willower, D. J. (1973). Perceived pupil control ideology consensus and teacher job satisfaction.Urban Educ. 8: 231–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was made possible by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH31724) to Jacquelynne S. Eccles, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD17296) to Jacquelynne S. Eccles, and the National Science Foundation (BNS-8510504) to Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Allan Wigfield.
Received Ph.D. in Education from the University of Michigan. Research interests are adolescent development, middle years education, teacher beliefs, and classroom processes.
Received M.A. in Education from the University of Michigan. Research interests are adolescent development, classroom environments, and supporting beginning teachers.
Received Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of California at Los Angeles. Research interests are development of self-concept, subjective task value, interests, and activity preferences, especially during early and middle adolescence. Also investigating the impact of school and family experiences on these constructs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H. & Eccles, J.S. The transition to junior high school: Beliefs of pre- and posttransition teachers. J Youth Adolescence 17, 543–562 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537831
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537831