Abstract
This article describes an extension of Marcia's (1966) Identity Status Interview into three interpersonal domains: friendships, dating, and sex roles. The Identity Status Interview method is assessed favorably in terms of identity theory, justification for the three new sections is provided on the basis of theory and research on sex differences in adolescent identity, and methodological refinements in the interview are described. A study is reported in which the extended interview was administered to 41 male and 40 female high school juniors and seniors. Average percentage of exact agreement for ratings of exploration, commitment, and identity status was over 70% when two coders were used and over 94% when the ratings of two out of three coders were used. It is concluded that this extended interview is psychometrically sound and provides a method for assessing interpersonal issues salient to contemporary adolescents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abend, S. A. (1974). Problems of identity: Theoretical applications.Psychoanal. Quart 43:606–637.
Bourne, E. (1978a). The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal. Part I.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 223–252.
Bourne, E. (1978b). The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal. Part II.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 371–392.
Coleman, J. C. (1974).Relationships in Adolescence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Coleman, J. C. (1978). Current contradictions in adolescent theory.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 1–11.
Constantinople, A. (1969). An Eriksonian measure of personality development in college students.Dev. Psychol. 1: 357–372.
Dignan, M. H. (1965). Ego identity and maternal identification.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1:476–483.
Douvan, E., and Adelson, J. (1966).The Adolescent Experience, Wiley, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1950).Childhood and Society, Norton, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.
Fleiss, J. L., Nee, J. C. M., and Landis, J. R. (1979). Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters.Psychol. Bull. 86: 974–977.
Grotevant, H. D., and Cooper, C. R. (1981). Assessing adolescent identity in the areas of occupation, religion, politics, friendships, dating and sex roles: Manual for administration and coding of the interview.JSAS Cat. Selected Documents Psychol. 11: 52 (Ms. No. 2295).
Grotevant, H. D., and Thorbecke, W. L. (in press). Sex differences in styles of occupational identity formation in late adolescence.Dev. Psychol.
Hauser, S. T. (1972). Black and White identity development: Aspects and perspectives.J. Youth Adoles. 1: 113–130.
Hauser, S. T. (1976). The content and structure of adolescent self-images: Longitudinal studies.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 33: 27–32.
Hodgson, J. W., and Fischer, J. L. (1979). Sex differences in identity and intimacy development in college youth.J. Youth Adoles. 8: 37–50.
Josselson, R., Greenberger, E., and McConochie, D. (1977a). Phenomenological aspects of psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Part I. Boys.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 25–55.
Josselson, R., Greenberger, E., and McConochie, D. (1977b). Phenomenological aspects of psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Part II. Girls.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 145–167.
Marcia, J. E. (1964). Scoring manual for ego identity status. Unpublished manuscript.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3:551–558.
Marcia, J. E. (1967). Ego identity status: Relationship to change in self-esteem, “general maladjustment,” and authoritarianism.J. Personal. 35: 113–133.
Marcia, J. E. (1976). Studies in ego identity. Unpublished research monograph, Simon Fraser University.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (ed.),Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Wiley, New York.
Marcia, J. E., and Friedman, M. L. (1970). Ego identity status in college women.J. Personal. 38: 249–263.
Matteson, D. R. (1974). Alienation vs. Exploration and Commitment: Personality and Family Correlaries of Adolescent Identity Status, Report from the Project for Youth; Research, Royal Danish School of Educational Studies, Copenhagen.
Matteson, D. R. (1977). Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories.J. Youth Addles. 6: 353–374.
Raphael, D. (1977). Identity status in university women: A methodological note.J. Youth Adoles. 6: 57–62.
Rasmussen, J. E. (1964). Relationship of ego identity to psychosocial effectiveness.Psychol. Rep. 15: 815–825.
Rothman, K. M. (1978). Multivariate analysis of the relationship of psychosocial crisis variables to ego identity status.J. Youth Adoles. 7: 93–105.
Schenkel, S. (1975). Relationship among ego identity status, field-independence, and traditional femininity.J. Youth Adoles. 4: 73–82.
Schenkel, S., and Marcia, J. E. (1972). Attitudes toward premarital intercourse in determining ego identity status in college women.J. Personal. 3: 472–482.
Simmons, D. D. (1970). Development of an objective measure of identity achievement status.J. Project. Techn. Personal. Assess. 34: 241–244.
Stein, A. H., and Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of achievement orientation in females.Psychol. Bull. 80: 345–366.
Thorbecke, W. L., and Grotevant, H. D. (1981). Gender differences in styles of adolescent interpersonal identity formation. Submitted for publication.
Toder, N., and Marcia, J. E. (1973). Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 26: 287–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs, University of Texas at Austin.
Received his Ph.D. in child psychology from the University of Minnesota. Main Interest is the influence of the family on adolescent personality development, especially identity and vocational interests.
Doctoral candidate in counseling psychology, with special interst in sex roles and adult development.
Received Ph.D. in community psychology from the University of Texas at Austin. Main interests include adult development, communities, and spiritual growth.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grotevant, H.D., Thorbecke, W. & Meyer, M.L. An extension of Marcia's Identity Status Interview into the interpersonal domain. J Youth Adolescence 11, 33–47 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537815
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537815