Abstract
The present study assessed the comparability of adolescents' (N=184), their mothers' (N=184), and their fathers' (N=184) attitudes toward contemporary societal issues, as well as each familial group's perceptions of the other two groups' attitudes. Results of multivariated analyses of variance indicated that while there were significant overall differences between adolescents' and either parent's self-ratings for the 36 questionnaire items (dealing with such topics as drug use, sexuality, and dress codes), major (i.e., 2-scale-point) differences between generational groups existed on only about 20% of the items. However, as predicted, both adolescents and parents misperceived the extensiveness of the divisions between them. Adolescents significantly overestimated the number of major differences between themselves and their mothers and fathers, while these two parental groups significantly underestimated such divisions. These distortions in perceived attitudes were also reflected in the results of correlational analyses assessing intrafamilial attitude consistencies and inconsistencies across the 36 items. Self-alternative-family-members' perceived attitudes correlations showed greater consistency than existed in the self-alternative-family-members' actual attitudes correlations. Moreover, both analyses of variance and correlational analyses indicated that there was greater similarity between the actual attitudes of the mothers and fathers than between either parental group and their children. These results are discussed in terms of the cognitive and emotional significance of the intrafamilial attitudes of adolescents and parents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthony, J. (1969). The reaction of adults to adolescents and their behavior. In Caplan, G., and Lebovici, S. (eds.),Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.
Cooley, W., and Lohnes, P. (1971).Multivariate Data Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence.Child Develop. 38: 1025–1034.
Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle.Psychol. Issues 1(1).
Freud, A. (1969). Adolescence as a developmental disturbance. In Caplan, G., and Lebovici, S. (eds.),Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.
Lerner, R. M. (1975). Showdown at Generation Gap: Attitudes of adolescents and their parents toward contemporary issues. In Thornburg, H. D. (ed.),Contemporary Adolescence, 2nd ed., Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif., in press.
Lerner, R. M., Pendorf, J., and Emery, A. (1971). Attitudes of adolescents and adults toward contemporary issues.Psychol. Rep. 28: 139–145.
Lerner, R. M., Schroeder, C., Rewitzer, M., and Weinstock, A. (1972). Attitudes of high school students and their parents toward contemporary issues.Psychol. Rep. 31: 255–258.
Lerner, R. M., Karson, M., Meisels, M., and Knapp, J. R. (1975). Actual and perceived attitudes of late adolescents and their parents: The phenomenon of the generation gaps.J. Genet. Psychol., in press.
Niemi, R. G. (1973). Political socialization. In Knutson, J. N. (ed.),Handbook of Political Psychology, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 117–138.
Piaget, J. (1969). The intellectual development of the adolescent. In Caplan, G., and Lebovici, S. (eds.),Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.
Troll, L. E., Neugarten, B. L., and Kraines, R. J. (1969). Similarities in values and other personality characteristics in college students and their parents.Merrill-Palmer Quart. 15: 323–336.
Weinstock, A., and Lerner, R. M. (1972). Attitudes of late adolescents and their parents toward contemporary issues.Psychol. Rep. 30: 239–244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received his Ph.D. from the City University of New York in developmental psychology. Current research interests include the relation of organismic variables to personality/social development.
Received his Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Denver. Research interests include measurement theory and cognition.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerner, R.M., Knapp, J.R. Actual and perceived intrafamilial attitudes of late adolescents and their parents. J Youth Adolescence 4, 17–36 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537798
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537798