Skip to main content
Log in

Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although concern is often raised about television's role as a “teacher” about sexuality, little is known about the specific content of sexual messages on the programs children and adolescents view most. To explore this issue, a content analysis was conducted of the twelve prime-time television programs most preferred by children and adolescents. For three episodes of each program, all interactions between the characters were examined for the presence of verbal statements about sexual issues. Relevant statements extracted were coded using a list of 17 categories reflecting scripts about sexuality common in our culture. Findings indicated that discussions about sexuality were quite common on these programs. On average, 29% of the interactions on an individual episode contained verbal references to sexual issues, with the level surpassing 50% for some episodes. There were more messages about the male sexual role than about the female sexual role, and more that emphasized a recreational orientation toward sex than a procreational orientation. The most frequently occurring types of messages were those in which sexual relations were depicted as a competition, in which men commented on women's bodies and physical appearance, and in which masculinity was equated with being sexual. The importance of physical attractiveness as a key asset was emphasized for and by both sexes. Results are discussed concerning adolescents' potential uses of this input, and concerning directions for further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (1983). The intimate relationship between gender roles and sexuality. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Bolton, F. G., and MacEachron, A. E. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality: A developmental perspective.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., Childers, K. W., and Waszak, C. S. (1990). Television and adolescent sexuality.J. Adoles. Health Care 11: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children's television viewing. In Bryant, J., Anderson, D. R. (eds.),Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwill, N., and Lips, H. M. (1981). Power and sexuality. In Lips, H. (ed.),Women, Men, and the Psychology of Power. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality. Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1989). The social control of human sexuality. In McKinney, K., and Sprecher, S. (eds.),Human Sexuality: The Societal and Interpersonal Context. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, A. (1986).Television and Children: A Special Medium for a Special Audience. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Collado, C., Greenberg, B. S., Korzenny, F., and Atkin, C. K. (1978). Sexual intimacy and drug use in TV series.J. Commun. 28: 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzblau, S., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1977). Sex on TV: A content analysis.J. Commun. 27: 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J., and Simon, W. (1973).Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (eds.),Perspectives on Media Effects. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerzon, M. (1983). Let's have some new heroes: Thoughts on sexuality and masculinity.Child. Telev. 6: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (1983). Straight talk: Teenage sex is a health hazard.Child Telev. 6: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S., Abelman, R., and Neuendorf, K. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Afternoon delight.J. Commun. 31: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S., and D'Alessio, D. (1985). Quantity and quality of sex in the soaps.J. Broadcast. Elec. Media, 29: 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S., Stanley, C., Siemicki, M., Heeter, C., Soderman, A., and Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex content on soaps and prime-time television series most viewed by adolescents. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.),Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, S. S., and Hendrick, C. (1993, February). Gender, sexuality, and close relationships. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.

  • Klein, M. (1983). Teens, sexuality and prime time entertainment.Child. Telev. 6: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (1987). Sexuality: A feminist perspective. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality: Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany:

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, D., Love, G., and Kirby, M. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Patterns of intimacy.J. Commun. 31: 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality and heterosexual masculinity: A conceptual model and review.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 85–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N. B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications.Sex. Marital Ther., 2: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N. B., and Jesser, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounter. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Monush, B. (ed.). (1994).International Television and Video Almanac. Quigley Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. E. (1983). Sexual socialization and gender roles in childhood. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Peplau, L. A., Rubin, A., and Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships.J. Social Issues 33: 86–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D., and Weinberg, M. S. (1984). Premarital coitus: Developing and established sexual scripts.Social Psychol. Quart. 47: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. (1980).Childhood Sexual Learning: The Unwritten Curriculum. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. (1983). Teens, sexuality and sex: Our mixed messages.Child. Telev. 6: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (1985). Is romance dysfunctional?M. J. Women's Studies. 8, 250–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, B. S., and Tabarlet, J. O. (1991). Sex in primetime television: 1979 versus 1989.J. Broadcast. Elect. Media 35: 505–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, B., and Dominick, J. (1986). Violence and sex in music videos: TV and rock ‘n’ roll.J. Commun. 36: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. T., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1979). Physical contact and sexual behavior on prime-time TV.J. Commun. 29: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1991). Sex and genre on prime time.J. Homosex. 12: 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprafkin, J. N., and Silverman, L. T. (1981). Update: Physically intimate and sexual behavior on prime-time TV, 1978–1979.J. Commun. 31: 34–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., and McKinney, K. (1993).Sexual Dimensions of Close Relationships. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truglio, R. T. (1993, March). Sex in the 90s: What are the lessons from prime-time TV? Poster presented at the 60th meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.

  • Unger, R., and Crawford, M. (1992).Women and Gender: A Feminist Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattleton, F. (1983). Truth or consequences.Child. Telev, 6: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellman, G. L., and Goodchilds, J. D. (1983). Becoming sexual in adolescence. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Earlier versions of this study were presented to the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, California, and to the Feminist Psychology Conference, Oakland, California.

Research interests center on children's understanding of male-female relations, in terms of both sexual relations and everyday interactions influenced by differential status. To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, L.M. Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. J Youth Adolescence 24, 595–615 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058

Keywords

Navigation