Abstract
Although concern is often raised about television's role as a “teacher” about sexuality, little is known about the specific content of sexual messages on the programs children and adolescents view most. To explore this issue, a content analysis was conducted of the twelve prime-time television programs most preferred by children and adolescents. For three episodes of each program, all interactions between the characters were examined for the presence of verbal statements about sexual issues. Relevant statements extracted were coded using a list of 17 categories reflecting scripts about sexuality common in our culture. Findings indicated that discussions about sexuality were quite common on these programs. On average, 29% of the interactions on an individual episode contained verbal references to sexual issues, with the level surpassing 50% for some episodes. There were more messages about the male sexual role than about the female sexual role, and more that emphasized a recreational orientation toward sex than a procreational orientation. The most frequently occurring types of messages were those in which sexual relations were depicted as a competition, in which men commented on women's bodies and physical appearance, and in which masculinity was equated with being sexual. The importance of physical attractiveness as a key asset was emphasized for and by both sexes. Results are discussed concerning adolescents' potential uses of this input, and concerning directions for further study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (1983). The intimate relationship between gender roles and sexuality. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
Bolton, F. G., and MacEachron, A. E. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality: A developmental perspective.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 259–273.
Brown, J. D., Childers, K. W., and Waszak, C. S. (1990). Television and adolescent sexuality.J. Adoles. Health Care 11: 62–70.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38: 217–230.
Collins, W. A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children's television viewing. In Bryant, J., Anderson, D. R. (eds.),Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. Academic Press, New York.
Colwill, N., and Lips, H. M. (1981). Power and sexuality. In Lips, H. (ed.),Women, Men, and the Psychology of Power. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality. Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany.
DeLamater, J. (1989). The social control of human sexuality. In McKinney, K., and Sprecher, S. (eds.),Human Sexuality: The Societal and Interpersonal Context. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Dorr, A. (1986).Television and Children: A Special Medium for a Special Audience. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
Fernandez-Collado, C., Greenberg, B. S., Korzenny, F., and Atkin, C. K. (1978). Sexual intimacy and drug use in TV series.J. Commun. 28: 30–37.
Franzblau, S., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1977). Sex on TV: A content analysis.J. Commun. 27: 164–170.
Gagnon, J., and Simon, W. (1973).Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality. Aldine, Chicago.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (eds.),Perspectives on Media Effects. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gerzon, M. (1983). Let's have some new heroes: Thoughts on sexuality and masculinity.Child. Telev. 6: 33–39.
Gordon, S. (1983). Straight talk: Teenage sex is a health hazard.Child Telev. 6: 13–18.
Greenberg, B. S., Abelman, R., and Neuendorf, K. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Afternoon delight.J. Commun. 31: 83–89.
Greenberg, B. S., and D'Alessio, D. (1985). Quantity and quality of sex in the soaps.J. Broadcast. Elec. Media, 29: 309–321.
Greenberg, B. S., Stanley, C., Siemicki, M., Heeter, C., Soderman, A., and Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex content on soaps and prime-time television series most viewed by adolescents. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.),Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.
Hendrick, S. S., and Hendrick, C. (1993, February). Gender, sexuality, and close relationships. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.
Klein, M. (1983). Teens, sexuality and prime time entertainment.Child. Telev. 6: 19–24.
Lott, B. (1987). Sexuality: A feminist perspective. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality: Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany:
Lowry, D., Love, G., and Kirby, M. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Patterns of intimacy.J. Commun. 31: 90–96.
Marsiglio, W. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality and heterosexual masculinity: A conceptual model and review.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 85–303.
McCormick, N. B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications.Sex. Marital Ther., 2: 3–27.
McCormick, N. B., and Jesser, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounter. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
Monush, B. (ed.). (1994).International Television and Video Almanac. Quigley Publishing Company, New York.
Parsons, J. E. (1983). Sexual socialization and gender roles in childhood. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
Peplau, L. A., Rubin, A., and Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships.J. Social Issues 33: 86–109.
Reed, D., and Weinberg, M. S. (1984). Premarital coitus: Developing and established sexual scripts.Social Psychol. Quart. 47: 129–138.
Roberts, E. (1980).Childhood Sexual Learning: The Unwritten Curriculum. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA.
Roberts, E. (1983). Teens, sexuality and sex: Our mixed messages.Child. Telev. 6: 9–12.
Rose, S. (1985). Is romance dysfunctional?M. J. Women's Studies. 8, 250–265.
Sapolsky, B. S., and Tabarlet, J. O. (1991). Sex in primetime television: 1979 versus 1989.J. Broadcast. Elect. Media 35: 505–516.
Sherman, B., and Dominick, J. (1986). Violence and sex in music videos: TV and rock ‘n’ roll.J. Commun. 36: 79–93.
Silverman, L. T., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1979). Physical contact and sexual behavior on prime-time TV.J. Commun. 29: 33–43.
Smith, C. (1991). Sex and genre on prime time.J. Homosex. 12: 119–138.
Sprafkin, J. N., and Silverman, L. T. (1981). Update: Physically intimate and sexual behavior on prime-time TV, 1978–1979.J. Commun. 31: 34–40.
Sprecher, S., and McKinney, K. (1993).Sexual Dimensions of Close Relationships. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Truglio, R. T. (1993, March). Sex in the 90s: What are the lessons from prime-time TV? Poster presented at the 60th meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
Unger, R., and Crawford, M. (1992).Women and Gender: A Feminist Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wattleton, F. (1983). Truth or consequences.Child. Telev, 6: 19–21.
Zellman, G. L., and Goodchilds, J. D. (1983). Becoming sexual in adolescence. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Earlier versions of this study were presented to the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, California, and to the Feminist Psychology Conference, Oakland, California.
Research interests center on children's understanding of male-female relations, in terms of both sexual relations and everyday interactions influenced by differential status. To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ward, L.M. Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. J Youth Adolescence 24, 595–615 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058