Abstract
A method for choosing effective teaching procedures for difficult-to-teach children is proposed. Assessment of child responses duringteaching that involves gradually increasing environmental support in the learning setting is the basis for choice. The levels of environmental support in which child responses are assessed are (1) trial-and-error procedures; (2) increased environmental support involving analyses of reinforcement systems, incompatible responses, and prerequisite skills, as well as the most effective use of instructional control; and (3) errorless-learning procedures. Effects of instructions upon learning are discussed in terms of instructional detail and pacing, as well as with respect to the role of instructions in feedback and progressively delayed cue procedures. Stimulus shaping and stimulus fading are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of each for teaching children who have difficulty learning with more traditional procedures. The importance of the incorporation of criterion-related cues when utilizing stimulus shaping or fading is emphasized. It is proposed that an assessment of child responses should be made with respect to the three general levels of environmental support, as well as from sublevels within these, in order to choose the simplest but still effective alternative procedure for teaching difficult-to-teach children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aangeenbrug, M. H., & Etzel, B. C. The development of a teacher administered learning-assessment model and teacher-directed intervention procedures for at-risk preschool children. Progress Report, Kansas Research Institute for the Early Childhood Education of the Handicapped, March 1979.
Bijou, S. W. Studies in the experimental development of left-right concepts in retarded children using fading techniques. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1968. Pp. 65–96.
Bijou, S. W.Child development: The basic stage of early childhood. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
Cheney, T., & Stein, N. Fading procedures and oddity learning in kindergarten children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,17, 313–321.
Cunningham, P. J., Cooper, A. Y., Plummer, S., & LeBlanc, J. M.Correction procedure effects upon an already acquired discrimination. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, September 1975.
Dixon, L. S., Spradlin, J. E., Girardeau, F. L., & Etzel, B. C. Development of a programmed stimulus series for trainingin front discrimination.Acta Symbolica, 1974,5, 1–21.
Gibson, E. J.Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
Goetz, E. M., & Etzel, B. C.Review of recent examples of discrimination learning research with children in which various manipulations of the S+ (correct choice) or S−(incorrect choice), or both, facilitated or failed to facilitate correct criterion-level (final) responding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, 1977.
Gollin, E. S., & Savoy, P. Fading procedures and conditional discrimination in children.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 443–445.
Hass, S. L., Ruggles, T. R., & LeBlanc, J. M.Minimal vs. criterion-related detailed instructions. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco, March 16, 1979.
Hogan, E., Cooper, A. Y., LeBlanc, J. M., & Etzel, B. C.A comparison of instructional and general teacher attention as reinforcement for motor behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, 1971.
Koegel, R. L., & Rincover, A. Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,4, 59–71.
Lawrence, D. H. The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1952,45, 511–516.
Marx, M. H., & Hillix, W. A.Systems and theories in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
Miller, R. M., Holmberg, M. C., & LeBlanc, J. M.Experimental analysis of contingent teacher attention and continuous and discrete teacher primes. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 1971.
Miller, R. M., & LeBlanc, J. M.Experimental analysis of the effect of detailed and minimal instructions on the acquisition of preacademic skills. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, August 1973.
Miller, R. M., & LeBlanc, J. M.Experimental analysis of detailed and minimal instructions and their effect on acquisition of a word recognition task. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, August 1974.
Peters, R. S.Brett's history of psychology. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1967.
Plummer, S., Baer, D. M., & LeBlanc, J. M. Functional considerations in the use of timeout and an effective alternative.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 689–705.
Radgowski, T. A., Allen, K. E., Ruggles, T. R., Schilmoeller, G. L., & LeBlanc, J. M.Training of a foreign language to preschool children using a delayed presentation of feedback. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Association of Behavior Analysis, Chicago, 1978.
Reese, E. P., Howard, J. S., & Rosenberger, P. B. Behavioral procedures for assessing visual capacities in nonverbal subjects. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.),New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method, and application. In honor of Sidney W. Bijou. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
Rincover, A. Variables affecting stimulus fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children.Journal of Abnromal Psychology, 1978,87, 541–553.
Schilmoeller, K. J., & Etzel, B. C. An experimental analysis of criterion-related and non-criterion-related cues in “errorless” stimulus control procedures. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.),New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method and application. In honor of Sidney W. Bijou. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
Schilmoeller, G. L., Schilmoeller, K. J., Etzel, B. C., & LeBlanc, J. M. Conditional discrimination responding after errorless and trial-and-error training.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979,31, 405–420.
Schlosberg, H., & Solomon, R. L. Latency of response in a choice discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943,33, 27–39.
Schreibman, L. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 91–112.
Schwartz, S. H., Firestone, I. J., & Terry, S. Fading techniques and concept learning in children.Psychonomic Science, 1971,25, 83–84.
Sidman, M., & Stoddard, L. T. Programming perception and learning for retarded children. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 151–208.
Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C.Procedural variables in errorless discrimination learning: Order of the S + and S− manipulation. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August 1978.
Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C.Manipulation of visual orientation on correct (S+) stimuli during acquisition. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development, San Francisco, March 16, 1979. (a)
Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C.Application of recent findings in errorless stimulus control technology. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Gatlinberg Conference on Research in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Gulf Shores, Alabama, April 1979. (b)
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. An implicit technology of generalization.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 2, 349–369.
Terrace, H. S. Discrimination learning with and without “errors.”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 1–27. (a)
Terrace, H. S. Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 223–232. (b)
Touchette, P. E. The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 39–48.
Touchette, P. E. Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 347–354.
Winslow, M. K., & Etzel, B. C.Assessment of preattending behavior: Procedural comparison and acquisition training. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, 1972.
Wulbert, M., Nyman, B. A., Snow, D., & Owen, Y. The efficacy of stimulus fading and contingency management in the treatment of elective mutism: A case study.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973,6, 435–441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by the following grants: The University of Kansas Institute for Research in the Early Childhood Education of the Handicapped, Bureau of the Education of the Handicapped, contract number United States Office of Education 300-77-0308; Program for a Research Center in Mental Retardation, National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, grant number Human Development-002528; and The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Developmental and Child Psychology Training Program, grant number T01-Human Development-00247. Appreciation is extended to Prof. Ellen P. Reese for invaluable and extensive editorial comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etzel, B.C., LeBlanc, J.M. The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. J Autism Dev Disord 9, 361–382 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531445
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531445