Skip to main content
Log in

A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The review examines ways in which working memory contributes to individual and particularly to developmental differences in writing skill. It begins with a brief definition of working memory and then summarizes current debates regarding working memory and capacity theories in the field of reading. It is argued that a capacity theory of writing can provide a framework within which to consider the development of writing skill, and relevant data are discussed. Effects of capacity limitations are documented in all three component writing processes: planning, translating, and reviewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R., (1976).Language, Memory, and Thought, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working-Memory. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., and Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1990). The development of text evaluation and revision skills.Child Devl. 61: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1996). The role of comprehension monitoring in children's revision.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaugrande, R. de. (1984).Text Production: Toward a Science of Composition, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A., and Plake, B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences among writers.J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 820–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., Burtis, B. J., and Scardamalia, M. (1988). Cognitive operations in constructing main points in written composition.J. Mem. Lang. 27: 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., Fine, J., and Gartshore, S. (April, 1979). An Exploratory Study of Micro-Planning in Writing. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987).The Psychology of Written Composition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, L., and Abbott, R. (in press). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems.Reading Writing: Interdis. J.

  • Berninger, V. W., Fuller, F., and Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the lifespan.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., and Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Carlson, J. S. (series ed.) and Butterfield, E. C. (vol. ed.),Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 2: Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, L., and Abbott, R. (in press). Assessment of planning, translation, and revising in junior high students.J. School Psychol.

  • Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., and Abbott, R. (1992). Lowerlevel developmental skills in beginning writing.Reading Writing: Interdisc. J. 4: 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulations.Psychol. Rev. 89: 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin, B., and Fayol, M. (August, 1993). Comparing Speaking Span and Writing Span: A Working Memory Approach. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Aix-en-Provence, France.

  • Bourdin, B., and Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach.Int. J. Psychol. 29: 591–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S. (1990). A review of recent research on spelling.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2: 365–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., and Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 239–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. A., Hunt, A. K., and Linton, M. (1996). Written expression as recontextualization. Children write in social time.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J., Engle, R. W., and Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate?Intelligence 15: 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Kurland, D. M., and Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 33: 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1976). Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficits?Mem. Cognit. 4: 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980).Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. A. (1981). Psycholinguistic foundations of the writing process.Res. Teach. Eng. 15: 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. A. (1984). Performance limits on writers. In Beach, R., and Bridwell, L. S. (eds.),New Directions in Composition Research, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1987). Reading and working memory. In Beach, J. R., and Colley, A. M. (eds.),Cognitive Approaches to Reading, Wiley, New York, pp. 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 19: 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cognit. 9: 561–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., and Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.J. Mem. Lang. 25: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In Templeton, S. and Bear, D. R. (eds.),Development of Orthographic Knowledge and the Foundations of Literacy: A Memorial Festschrift of Edmund H. Henderson, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Nations, J., and Cantor, J. (1990). Is working memory capacity just another name for word knowledge?J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 799–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C., Raphael, T., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Fear, K., and Gregg, S. (1988.) A case for writing intervention: Strategies for writing informational text.Learn. Disab. Focus 3: 98–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C. S., Stewart, S. R., and Hiebert, E. H. (1988). Young writer's use of text structure in expository text generation.J. Educ. Psychol. 80: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, M., Largy, P., and Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors: A study in French written language.Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 47: 437–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., and Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing.J. Mem. Lang. 25: 348–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., and Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing.J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 424–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing.Coll. Eng. 41: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg, L. W. and Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.),Cognitive Processes in Writing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In Frederiksen, C. H. and Dominic, J. F. (eds.),Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication, Vol. 2. Writing: Process, Development, and Communication, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing.Written Commun. 1: 120–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., and Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision.Coll. Comp. Commun. 37: 16–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983).Modularity and Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1985). Precis ofThe Modularity of Mind.Behav. Brain Sci. 8: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M., and McCutchen, D. (April, 1994).Strategy Differences in Revising Between Skilled and Less Skilled Writers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Frith, U. (ed.) (1980).Cognitive Processes in Spelling. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (ed.). (1980).Errors in Linguistic Performance. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling inGNYS AT WRK.Reading Teacher 36: 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Muth, D., and Dugan, N. (1982). Writing and revising persuasive documents: Cognitive demands.J. Educ. Psychol. 74: 557–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In Gregg, L. W., and Steinberg, E. R. (eds.),Cognitive Processes in Writing Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, J. (August, 1994). Writing as Language Production—Towards a Regulation Theory of Writing. Paper presented at the Biannual Meeting of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Utrecht.

  • Grabowski, J., Vorwerg, C., and Rummer, R. (1994). Writing as a tool for control of episodic representation. In Eigler, G., and Jechle, T. (eds.),Writing: Current Trends in European Research. Hochschul Verlag, Freburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Hopkinson, P. L., Lewis, E. W., and Bruflodt, H. A. (1984). The impact of different information sources on idea generation: Writing off the top of our heads.Written Commun. 1: 341–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions.J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 781–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., and Whitaker, D. (1996).The Role of Mechanics in Composing of Elementary School Students: A New Methodological Approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Graham, S., Harris, K., and Loynachan, C. (1994). The spelling for writing list.J. Learn. Disab. 27: 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1978). Research update: Handwriting is for writing.Lang. Arts 55: 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1983).Writing: Teachers and Children at Work. Heinemann, Exeter, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, R. A. (1982). Children as writers: The beginnings of learning to write. In Nystrand, M. (ed.),What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Communication, Vol. 2. Writing: Process, Development, and Communication, Academic Press, New York, pp. 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D. J., Plumb, C., Butterfield, E. C., Quathamer, D., and Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors.J. Educ. Psychol. 86: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., and Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L. W., and Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.),Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp. 31–50). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions of two discourse types.Disc. Proc. 6: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. (1987). The editing process in writing: A performance study of more skilled and less skilled college writers.Res. Teach. Eng. 21: 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., and Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychol. Rev. 99: 122–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R., and Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences.Res. Teach. Eng. 20: 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1986). Designing idea processors for document composition.Behav. Res. Meth., Instr., and Comput. 18: 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes.Mem. Cognit. 15: 256–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies.J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cognit. 14: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands.Am. J. Psychol. 103: 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., and Rental, V. (1981). Research update: Conveying meaning in written texts.Lang. Arts 58: 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, R. E. (1993). Effects of different instructional tasks on students' narrative writing.J. Exp. Educ. 61: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognit. Psychol. 6: 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. A. (1986).Children Reading and Writing: Structures and Strategies. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largy, P., Fayol, M., and Lemaire, P. (in press). The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb/noun inflection errors.Lang. Cognit. Proc.

  • Locke, D. (1995). Syswrite: Writing Process Analysis Software. Research Report, Department of Education, University of Washington.

  • MacArthur, C. A., and Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation.J. Spec. Educ. 21: 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. A., Harris, K. R., and Graham, S. (1994). Improving students' planning processes through cognitive strategy instruction. In Carlson, J. S. (series ed.) and Butterfield, E. C. (vol. ed.),Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 2: Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martlew, M., and Sorsby, A. (1995). The precursors of writing: Graphic representation in preschool children.Learn. Instr. 5: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1984). Writing as a linguistic problem.Educ. Psychol. 19: 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing.Disc. Proc. 10: 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control.Written Commun. 5: 306–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three, plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. In Carlson, J. S. (series ed.) and Butterfield, E. C. (vol. ed.),Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 2: Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (in press). Cognitive processes in children's writing: Developmental and individual differences.Issues Educ.: Contrib. Educ. Psychol.

  • McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., and Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency.J. Educ. Psychol. 86: 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Hull, G. A., and Smith, W. L. (1987). Editing strategies and error correction in basic writing.Written Commun. 4: 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen D., Kerr, S., and Francis, M. (April, 1994). Editing and Revising: Effects of Knowlege of Topic and Error Location. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • McCutchen, D., and Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production.Text 2: 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. D. (1980). Memory Capacity and Inferential Abilities in Five- and Seven-Year-Old Children. Unpublished master's thesis, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menyuk, P. (1988).Language Development: Knowledge and Use, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychol. Rev. 63: 81–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M., Graves, A., and Leavell, A. (1991). Planning, procedural facilitation, and narrative composition of junior high students with learning disabilities.Learn. Disab. Res. Pract. 6: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, P. L., and Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990.J. Learn. Disab. 24: 578–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading Ability. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1991). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P., Ehri, L., and Treiman, R. (eds.),Reading Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., and McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In Rosenberg, S. (ed.),Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics (Vol. 2), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, T. E., Englert, C. S., and Kirschner, B. W. (1989). Students' metacognitive knowledge about writing.Res. Teach. Engl. 23: 343–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (1981). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In Frederiksen, C. H., and Dominic, J. F. (eds.),Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication, Vol. 2. Writing: Process, Development, and Communication Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard, C. K. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers.Res. Teach. Eng. 8: 206–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich. K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity.Devel. Rev. 10: 72–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1992). The generality and modifiability of working memory.J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 473–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., and Berninger, V. W. (1994). Working memory as a source of individual differences in children's writing. In Carlson, J. S. (series ed.) and Butterfield, E. C. (vol. ed.),Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 2: Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetroe, J. (April, 1984).Information Processing Demand of Plot Construction in Story Writing. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Turner, M. L., and Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?J. Mem. Lang. 28: 27–154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCutchen, D. A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educ Psychol Rev 8, 299–325 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076

Key words

Navigation