Skip to main content
Log in

The role of comprehension monitoring in Children's revision

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Revision is a critically important component of the writing process, yet much research indicates that young children are often reluctant to revise unless provided with strong adult encouragement and support. Children's limited comprehension monitoring ability may contribute to their difficulty with revision. Children in the early elementary school years have been found to systematically overestimate the clarity of text, and therefore they often fail to identify potential comprehension problems that might be experienced by a naive reader. Conversely, accurate assessment of text comprehensibility has been shown to lead to successful revisions by both older and younger children. Recent studies indicate that training in comprehension monitoring strategies in turn yields benefits for children's revision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. P. (1988). Reason inferences in the story comprehension of children and adults.Child Devel. 59: 1426–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. P. (1985). Excuse inference modification in children and adults.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 39: 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. P. (1981). Performative bias in children's interpretations of ambiguous referential communications.Child Devel. 52: 1224–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., and Beal, C. R. (1995). Children's recognition of inconsistencies in science texts: Multiple measures of comprehension monitoring.Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 9: 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., and Mullis, I. V. S. (1986).The Writing Report Card: Writing Achievement in American Schools, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ: (Report No. 15-W-02).

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. N., Langer, J., Jenkins, L. B., Mullis, I. V. S., and Foertsch, M. A. (1990).Learning to Write in our Nation's Schools, National Assessment of Educational Progress, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., and Clift, R. (1984). Metacognitive skills of reading.Reading Res. Quart. 20: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., and Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring.Reading Res. Quart. 17: 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautz, B. J., and Beal, C. R. (1993). Elementary teachers talk about process writing: Grass roots issues and strategies.Mass. Primer 22: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1993). Contributions of developmental psychology to understanding revision: Implications for consultation with classroom teachers.School Psychol. Rev. 22: 641–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1990a). The development of text evaluation and revision skills.Child Devel. 61: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1990b). Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension.Child Devel. 61: 1011–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R. (1987). Repairing the message: Children's monitoring and revision skills.Child Devel. 58: 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R., and Belgrad, S. L. (1990). The development of message evaluation skills in young children.Child Devel. 61: 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R., and Flavell, J. H. (1984). Development of the ability to distinguish communicative intention and literal message meaning.Child Devel. 55: 920–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R., and Flavell, J. H. (1982). The effect of increasing the salience of message ambiguities on kindergartners' evaluations of communicative success and message adequacy.Devel. Psychol. 18: 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. R., Garrod, A. C., and Bonitatibus, G. J. (1990). Fostering children's revision skills through training in comprehension monitoring.J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987).The Psychology of Written Composition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonitatibus, G. J. (1988). Comprehension monitoring and the apprehension of literal meaning.Child Devel. 59: 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonitatibus, G. J., and Beal, C. R. (in press). Finding new meanings: Children's recognition of interpretive ambiguity in text.J. Exp. Child Psychol.

  • Bonitatibus, G., Godshall, S., Kelley, M., Levering, T., and Lynch, E. (1988). The role of social cognition in comprehension monitoring.First Lang. 8: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., and Albertson, L. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive processes underlying text revision.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 239–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, L. M. (1991).Living Between the Lines, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. A., Hunt, A. K., and Linton, M. (1996). Written expression as recontextualization: Writing in social time.Educational Psychology Review.

  • Capelli, C. A., and Markman, E. M. (April, 1985). Improving Comprehension Monitoring Through Training in Hypothesis Testing. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.

  • Casteel, M. (March, 1993). Text Structure and Children's Interpretation of Ambiguous Events. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.

  • Cazden, C. B. (1992).Whole Language Plus: Essays on literacy in the United States and New Zealand, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott-Faust, D. J., and Pressley, M. (1986). How to teach comparison processing to increase children's short and long term listening comprehension monitoring.J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C. S., Hiebert, E. H., and Stewart, S. R. (1988). Detecting and correcting inconsistencies in the monitoring of expository prose.J. Educ. Res. 81: 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., and Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms.Am. Educ. Res. J. 28: 337–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, C. (June 8, 1994). Writing difficulties found in schools.Boston Globe p. 3.

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1992). Variant views about good thinking during composing: Focus on revision. In Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., and Guthrie, J. T. (eds.),Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing.Rev. Educ. Res. 57: 481–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., and Markham, L. R. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing.Cognit. Instr. 4: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., and Hayes, J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In Fredericksen, C. H., and Dominic, J. F. (eds.),Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., and Anderson, J. (1982). Monitoring-of-understanding research: Inquiry directions, methodological dilemmas.J. Exp. Educ. 50: 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., and Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension.Mem. Cognit. 15: 84–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., and MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self instructional strategy training.J. Spec. Educ. 22: 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1991).Build a Literate Classroom. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1983).Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Heinemann, Exeter, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., and Graham, S. (1992).Helping Young Writers Master the Craft: Strategy Instruction and Self Regulation in the Writing Process, Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., and Graham, S. (1988). Self instructional strategy training: Improving writing skills among educationally handicapped students.Teach. Except. Childr. 20: 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harste, J. C., Short, K., and Burke, C. (1988).Creating classrooms for authors: The Reading—Writing Connection. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.Child Devel. 50: 643–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition.Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 299–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., and Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory.J. Mem. Lang. 25: 645–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. (1987). Fostering comprehension monitoring in below average readers through self-instruction training.J. Reading Behav. 19: 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. (1985). The effects of general and specific self-instruction training on children's comprehension monitoring performances during reading.Reading Res. Quart. 20: 616–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P., and Russell, J. (1989). Young children's understanding of the say-mean distinction in referential speech.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 47: 467–490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1986).The Writing Report Card: Writing Achievement in American Schools, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1994).The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J., O'Brien, C., Kister, M. C., Carter, D. B., and Kotsonis, M. E. (1981). Development of comprehension monitoring as a function of context.Devel. Psychol. 17: 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., and Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiplechoice questions.Reading Res. Quart. 25: 232–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., and Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction.Elem. School J. 89: 301–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., and Woloshyn, V. (1995).Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance (2nd Ed.). Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. J. (1981). The child's understanding of inadequate messages and communication failure: A problem of ignorance or egocentrism? In Dickson, W. P. (ed.),Children's Oral Communication Skills, Academic Press, New York, pp. 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., Goelman, H., and Olson, D. R. (1983). Children's relationship between expressions (what was said) and intentions (what was meant).Brit. J. Devel. Psychol. 1: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. J., and Robinson, W. P. (1983). Children's uncertainty about the interpretation of ambiguous messages.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 36: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. R., Schmidt, S. R., and Tomalis, S. M. (1984). Children's constructive processing and monitoring of stories containing anomalous information.Child Devel. 55: 2056–2071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Korkel, J., and Weinert, F. E. (1989). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high- and low-aptitude children.J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., and Surber, J. R. (1986). Comprehension monitoring failure in skilled adult readers.J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. G., and Myers, N. A. (1985). Inferences and recall at ages four and seven.Child Devel. 56: 1134–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, N., and Olson, D. R. (1989). Children's Understanding of Ambiguity and Interpretation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Torrance, N., and Olson, D. R. (1985). Oral and literate competencies in the early school years. In Olson, D. R., Torrance, N., and Hildyard, A. (eds.),Literacy, Language, and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 256–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddill, P. J., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (1988). Illustrations as adjuncts to prose: A text-appropriate processing approach.J. Educ. Psychol. 80: 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it.Reading Res. Quart. 17: 328–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabrucky, B. J., and Ratner, H. H. (1986). Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories.Child Devel. 57: 1401–1418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., and Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self regulated learning strategies.Am. Educ. Res. J. 23: 614–628.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beal, C.R. The role of comprehension monitoring in Children's revision. Educ Psychol Rev 8, 219–238 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464074

Key words

Navigation