Skip to main content
Log in

A process model of writing development across the life span

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we provide an overview of writing development from a product perspective and from a process perspective. Then we discuss modifications of the most influential process model of skilled adult writing to explain beginning and developing writing, including a proposed developmental sequence of the emergence of cognitive processes in writing. Next we report the results of two recent dissertations by the second and third authors supervised by the first author aimed toward contrasting developmental issues: (a) specifying the algorithms or rules of thumb beginning and developing writers may use during on-line planning; and (b) investigating the further development of writing processes among skilled adult writers. In the first study, development was conceptualized as a linear process across age groups. In the second study, development was conceptualized as a horizontal process within skilled adult writers who expanded their expertise. Finally, we consider the developmental constraints and the instructional constraints on writing development and argue for a model of writing development in which endogenous and exogenous process variables interact to determine the outcome of the writing development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R., and Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade students.J. Educ. Psychol. 85(3): 478–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. (1987). Repairing the message: Children's monitoring and revision skills.Child Devel. 58: 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. (1993). Contributions of developmental psychology to understanding revision: Implications for consultation with classroom teachers.School Psychol. Rev. XXII: 643–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (1994a).Reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective W. C. Brown and Benchmark, Madison, WI. Reprinted by Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (1994b). Future directions for research on writing disabilities: Integrating endogenous and exogenous variables. In Lyon, G. R. (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. New Views on Measurement Issues Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, (pp. 419–439).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., and Abbott, R. (1995). Modeling developmental and individual variability in reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective. In Kirk, U., and Molfese, D. (eds.),Development Variations in Language and Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., and Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for diagnosis of writing disabilities in primary grade children.J. School Psychol. 30: 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., and Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., and Abbott, R. (1992). Lowerlevel developmental skills in beginning writing.Reading Writing: Interdisc. J. 4: 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H., and Abbott, R. (1994a). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades.Reading Writing: Interdisc. J. 6: 161–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Mizokawa, D., Bragg, R., Cartwright, A., and Yates, C. (1994b). Intraindividual differences in levels of written language.Reading Writing Quart. 10: 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., and Nolen, S. (1995). Integrating low-level and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities.Learn. Disab. Quart. 18: 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, L., and Abbott, R. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers.J. School Psychol. 34: 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L., and Lahey, M. (1978),Language Development and Language Disorders, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtis, P., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., and Tetroe, J. (1983). The development of planning in writing. In Wells, C. G. and Kroll (eds.),Explorations of Children's Development in Writing, Wiley, Chichester, England, pp. 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E., Hacker, D., and Plumb, C. (1994). Topic knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and revision skill as determinator of text revision. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 83–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing.Rev. Educ. Res. 57: 481–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. (1995).Development of Topic-Comment Algorithms and Text Structures in Written Compositions of Students in Grades One Through Nine. Dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Garvey, C. (1979). On Responding. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Gibson, E., and Levin, H. (1975).The Psychology of Reading, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses.Lang. Soc. 5: 257–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., and Winetraub, H. (in press). Review of handwriting research: Progress and prospect from 1980 to 1994.Educ. Psychol. Rev.

  • Graham, S., Harris, K., MacArthur, C., and Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program.Learn. Disab. Quart. 14: 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. (1975). An examination of the writing processes of seven year old children.Res. Teach. Eng. 9: 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. (1983).Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. (1967). Topicalization in child language.Found. Lang. 3: 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, D. (1985). Writing anxiety.Arts Psychother. 12(3): 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1992).Helping Young Writers Master the Craft: Strategy Instruction and Self-Regulation in the Writing Process, Brookline Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration.J. Spec. Educ. 28: 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J., and Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing process. In Gregg, W., and Steinberg, E. R. (eds.),Cognitive Processes in Writing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Templeton, S., and Bear, D. (eds.),Development of Orthographic Knowledge and the Foundations of Literacy, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions of two discourse types.Disc. Proc. 6: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G. (November 1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies.Am. J. Educ. 133–170.

  • Hooper, S., Montgomery, J., Swartz, C., Reed, M., Sandler, A., Levine, M., Watson, T., and Wasileski, T. (1994). Measurement of written language expression. In Lyon, G. R., (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. New Views on Measurement Issues, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, pp. 375–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudgins, A., and Schultz, J. (1978). On observing: The use of Carkhuff HRD model in writing psychological reports.J. School Psychol. 16: 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kicklighter, R., and Bailey-Richardson, B. (1984). Psychological assessments: Tasks and time.School Psychol. Rev. 13: 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. (1986).Children Reading and Writing: Structures and Strategies, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, L. O. (1972). The Development of Perception of Writing in Pre-reading Children: A Cross-Cultural Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Development, Cornell University.

  • MacArthur, C., and Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing.J. Spec. Educ. 21: 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., and Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms.Learn. Disab. Res. Pract. 6: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C., Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1994). Helping students with learning disabilities plan compositions: Instruction in cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability.J. Mem. Lang. 25: 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing.Disc. Proc. 10: 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three, plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., and Perfetti, C. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production.Text 2: 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., and McCutchen, D. (1982). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In Rosenberg, S. (ed.),Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics (Vol. 2), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. (1988).Assessment of Children (3rd Ed.), Jerome M. Sattler, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1987).The Psychology of Written Compositions, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Goleman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In Nystrand, M. (ed.),What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 175–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger (1982). Presentation and interpretation of psychological data in educational settings. In Reynolds, C. R., and Guthrie, T. B. (eds.),The Handbook of School Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 51–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., and Berninger, V. (1994). Working memory as a source of individual differences in children's writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, D., Cartwright, A., and Berninger, V. (in press). A comparison study of beginning literacy programs: Alternatives paths to the same learning outcome.Learn. Disab. Quart.

  • Vonnegut, K. (1981).Palm Sunday, Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and development psychology.Harvard Educ. Rev. 7: 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In Harris, D. B. (ed.),The Concept of Development: An Issue in the Study of Human Behavior, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, D. (1994).How School Psychology Trainees Learn to Communicate Through the School Psychological Report. Dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Whitaker, D. (1995). Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Processes Underlying School Psychological Report Writing (manuscript in preparation).

  • Whitaker, D., Berninger, V., Johnston, J., and Swanson, H. L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of written language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translation process.Learn. Ind. Diff. 6: 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zins, J., and Barnett, D. (1983). Report writing: Legislative, ethical, and professional challenges.J. School Psychol. 21(3): 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berninger, V.W., Fuller, F. & Whitaker, D. A process model of writing development across the life span. Educ Psychol Rev 8, 193–218 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464073

Key words

Navigation