Summary
Five protocol-analysis experiments with tactical, endgame, and strategic positions were conducted to study cognitive errors in chess players' thinking. It will be argued that chess players' errors can be only partially explained in terms of unspecified working-memory overload, because the working-memory loads caused by the solution paths are usually small. It is therefore necessary to consider apperceptive mechanisms also, as these control information intake.
Subjects fail either because they are not able to see the right prototypical problem space at all, or because they fail to close them as a result of missing some crucial task-relevant cue. This makes chess players lose their “belief in the idea” and restructure, after which the apperceptive information-selection mechanisms make the fording of the solution still more unlikely.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak method problem solutions.Psychological Review, 94, 192–210.
Anderson, J. R., & Jeffries, R. (1985). Novice Lisp errors: Undetected losses of information from working memory.Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 403–423.
Bellin, R., & Ponzetto, P. (1985).Test your positional play. London: Batsford.
Bradley, A., Hudson, S. R., Robbins, T., & Baddeley, A. (1987). Working memory in chess. Unpublished report, Cambridge, May 1987.
Broadbent, D. (1975). The magic number seven after twenty years. In R. Kennedy, & A. Wilkes (Eds.),Studies in long term memory, (pp. 3–18). New York: Wiley.
Charness, N. (1977). Human chess skill. In P. W. Frey (Ed.),Chess skill in man and machine (pp. 34–53). New York: Springer.
Charness, N. (1981). Search in chess: Age and skill difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 467–476.
Charness, N. (1989). Expertise in chess and bridge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.),Complex information processing: the impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in Chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). Academic Press: New York.
Dreyfus, H. (1972).What computers can't do. New York. harper & Row.
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986).Mind over machine. Glasgow: Basil Blackwell.
Elo, A. (1978).The ratings of chess players: Past and present. London: Batsford.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. (1984).Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fine, R. (1969).Basic chess endings. David McKay: New York.
Groot, A. D. de (1965).Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
Groot, A. D. de (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.),Problem solving (pp. 19–50). New York: Wiley.
Hartstone, W., & Wason, P. C. (1983).The psychology of chess. London: Batsford.
Holding, D. H. (1985).the psychology of chess skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holding, D. H. (1989 a). Adversary problem solving by humans. In K. J. Gilhooly (Ed.),Human and machine problem solving (pp. 83–122). New York: Plenum Press.
Holding, D. H. (1989b). Evaluation factors in human tree search.American Journal of Psychology, 102, 109–111.
Holding, D. H. (1992). Theories of chess skill.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 54, 10–16.
Holding, D. H., & Phan, H. D. (1985). Thinking ahead in chess.American Journal of Psychology, 98, 271–282.
Leibnitz, G. W. (1704/1979).New essays on human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lories, G. (1987). Recall of random and non-random chess positions in strong and weak chess players.Psychologica Belgica, 27, 153–159.
Liidtke, F. (1911).Kritische Geschichte der Apperzeptionsbegriffe. Leipzig: Johan Ambrosius Barth.
Miller, G. E. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 11–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reti, R. (1933).The masters of chess boards. Bell: London.
Saariluoma, P. (1984).Coding problem spaces in chess. Commentationesscientiarumsocialium (Vol. 23). Turku: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
Saariluoma, P. (1990). Apperception and restructuring in chess players' problem solving. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thought. Reflections on the psychology of thinking (pp. 41–57). Wiley: London.
Saariluoma, P. (1992). Visuospatial and articulatory interference in chess players' information intake.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 77–89.
Saariluoma, P. (1991). Aspects of skilled imagery in blindfold chess.Acta Psychologica, 77, 65–89.
Scheerer, E. (1980). Wilhelm Wundt's psychology of memory.Psychological Research, 42, 135–155.
Scheerer, E. (1981). Early German approaches to experimental reading research: The contributions of Willhelm Wundt and Ernst Meumann.Psychological Research, 43, 111–130.
Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. (1974). How big is a chunk?Science, 183, 129–138.
Simon, H. A., & Barenfeld, M. (1969). Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving.Psychological Review, 76, 473–483.
Tikhomirov, O. K., & Poznyanskaja, E. D. (1966). Investigation of visual search as a means of analysing heuristics.Soviet Psychology, 12, 39–53.
Wundt, W. (1920).Grundriss der Psychologie. Kröner: Stuttgart.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saariluoma, P. Error in chess: The apperception-restructuring view. Psychol. Res 54, 17–26 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359219