Skip to main content
Log in

Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six experiments were conducted to test whether the spatial properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions are similar to those of representations derived from visual experience. Data from spatial priming, distance comparison, and mental scanning experiments all suggest that people are able to convert verbal descriptions of configurations into mental representations that reflect the spatial extension of these configurations. In addition, cognitive maps constructed from descriptions exhibit reliable metric properties which make them structurally isomorphic to the corresponding spatial configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes.Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, K. N., & Chattin, D. (1989). Spatial and semantic priming effects in test of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. S., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Influence of spatial organization in prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1991).Image and cognition. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., & Denhière, G. (1990). Comprehension and recall of spatial descriptions.European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1989).Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., & Pinker, S. (1982). Spontaneous imagery scanning in mental extrapolation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., & Pinker, S. (1983). Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 398–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foos, P. W. (1980). Constructing cognitive maps from sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraudo, M.-D., & Pailhous, J. (1990).Distortions in memory for urban space: Inaccuracy and inconsistency. Proceedings of the Third European Workshop in Imagery and Cognition 54–55). Aberdeen: Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.Memory & Cognition, 13, 208–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle, S. C., & Mascolo, M. F. (1986). Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A. (1982). Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 328–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1985). Is time to scan visual images due to demand characteristics?Memory & Cognition, 13, 320–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1983).Ghosts in the mind's machine: Creating and using images in the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of mental scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A., Woodard, K. A., & Haygood, R. C. (1992). Properties of maps that facilitate recall of associated text. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Imagery, memory and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., & Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information.Memory & Cognition, 5, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions.Memory & Cognition, 10, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M. (1983). Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: Salience, expectancy, and associative priming.Memory & Cognition, 11, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology, 18, 87–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P., Hardy, J. K., & Hirtle, S. C. (1989). Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1984). The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moar, I., & Bower, G. H. (1983). Inconsistency in spatial knowledge.Memory & Cognition, 11, 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morra, S. (1989). Developmental differences in the use of verbatim versus spatial representations in the recall of spatial descriptions.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S., & Bayer, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect.Cognitive Psychology, 8, 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.Memory & Cognition, 3, 635–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. C., & Mason, D. A. (1982). Is there evidence for automatic processing of spatial and color attributes present in pectures and words?Memory & Cognition, 10, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text.Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezdek, K., Roman, Z., & Sobolik, K. G. (1986). Spatial memory for objects and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 530–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S., Choate, P. A., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Mental extrapolation in patterns constructed from memory.Memory & Cognition, 12, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K., Hock, H. S., & Lockhead, G. R. (1983). Tacit knowledge and the effect of pattern configuration on mental scanning.Memory & Cognition, 11, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa, J. L. (1977). Spatial transformations of words and pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1981). Distortion in memory for maps.Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27) (pp. 109–145). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, M., & Wender, K. F. (1985). Spatial representations and inference process in memory for text. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.),Inferences in text processing (pp. 115–136). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener-Wender, M., & Wender, K. F. (1990). Expectations, mental representations, and spatial inferences. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 25 (pp. 137–157). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Visuelle und semantische Merkmale im Recall.Sprache und Kognition, 8, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denis, M., Zimmere, M. Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions. Psychol. Res 54, 286–298 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358266

Keywords

Navigation