Abstract
This review of learning from maps and diagrams consists of two sections. The first section presents a theoretical framework for learning from maps and diagrams. The case is made that the symbol systems of maps and diagrams are sufficiently similar for them to be considered together. The theoretical framework is built around what is known of pre-attentive and top-down psychological processes. It accounts for the way people discriminate between symbols used in maps and diagrams and how they group them into clusters. The second section comprises a review of psychological and instructional research. This research provides support for a number of hypotheses arising from the theoretical framework. Many of these are based on the notion that maps and diagrams communicate a considerable amount of information by the way in which components are placed relative to each other and to the frame surrounding them. Evidence that configuration and discrimination are fundamental to learning from maps and diagrams is summarized in 10 concluding points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, R., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1986). Presentation mode and the use of maps in prose learning.American Educational Research Journal, 23: 263–274.
Abel, R., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1989). Associating map features and related prose in memory.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14: 33–48.
Aelinski, E. M., and Light, L. L. (1988). Young and older adults' use of context in spatial memory.Psychology and Aging, 3: 99–101.
Amlund, J. T., Gaffney, J., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1985). Map feature content and text recall of good and poor readers.Journal of Reading Behavior, 17: 317–330.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Antes, J. R., and Mann, S. W. (1984). Global-local precedence in picture processing.Psychological Research, 46: 247–259.
Arend, U., Muthig, K. P., and Wandmacher, J. (1987). Evidence for global feature superiority in menu selection by icons.Behaviour and Information Technology, 6: 411–426.
Armbruster, B. B., and Anderson, T. H. (1982). Idea mapping: The technique and its use in the classroom, or simulating the “ups” and “downs” of reading comprehension. University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading, Reading Education Report no. 36 (ED 221842), Urbana, Illinois.
Armbruster, B. B., and Anderson, T. H. (1984). Mapping: Representing informative text graphically. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–209.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968).The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning, Grune and Stratton, New York.
Bartram, D. J. (1980). Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 103–110.
Beatty, W. W., and Bruellman, J. A. (1987). Absence of gender differences in memory of map learning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25: 238–239.
Bellezza, F. S. (1986). A mnemonic based on arranging words in a visual pattern.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78: 217–224.
Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading.Reading Research Quarterly, 21: 161–178.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review, 94: 115–147.
Bradley, D. R., and Vido, D. (1984). Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered distance.Perception, 13: 315–320.
Brandt, H. (1945).The Psychology of Seeing, Philosophical Library, New York.
Bulgren, J., Shumaker, J. B., and Deshler, D. D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes.Learning Disability Quarterly, 11: 3–17.
Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical thinking: A struggle for meaning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15: 35–49.
Carrier, C., Post, T. R., and Heck, W. (1985). Using microcomputers with fourth-grade students to reinforce arithmetic skills.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16: 45–51.
Chase, W. G., and Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, New York.
Corkill, A. J., Bruning, R. H., and Glover, J. A. (1988a). Advance organizers: Concrete versus abstract.Journal of Educational Research, 82: 76–81.
Corkill, A. J., Glover, J. A., Bruning, R. H., and Krug, D. (1988b). Advance organizers: Retrieval context hypotheses.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80: 304–311.
Dalbey, J., Tourniaire, F., and Linn, M. C. (1986). Making programming instruction cognitively demanding: An intervention study.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23: 427–436.
Dansereau, D. F., Collins, K. W., McDonald, B. A., Holley, C. D., Garland, J., Diekhoff, G., and Evans, S. H. (1979). Development and evaluation of a learning strategy program.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 64–73.
Da Silva, J. A., Ruiz, E. M., and Marques, S. L. (1987). Individual differences in magnitude estimates of inferred, remembered, and perceived geographical distance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25: 240–243.
Decker, W. H., and Wheatley, P. C. (1982). Spatial grouping, imagery, and free recall.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55: 45–46.
DeKleer, J., and Brown, J. S. (1981). Mental models of physical mechanisms and their acquisition. In Anderson, J. R. (ed.),Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Deregowski, J. B. (1989). Real space and represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12: 51–119.
Deregowski, J. B., and Dziurawiec, S. (1986). Some aspects of comprehension of technical diagrams: An intercultural study.Travail Humain, 49: 43–60.
Dickson, L. S., Schrankel, P. S. and Kulhavy, R. W. (1988). Verbal and spatial encoding of text.Instructional Science, 17: 145–157.
Doblin, J. (1980). A structure for non-textual communications. In Kolers, P. A., Wrolstad, M. E., and Bouma, N. (eds.),Processing Visible Language, Vol. II, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 89–111.
Egan, D. E., and Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory and Cognition, 7: 149–158.
Engelmann, S. (1969).Conceptual Learning, Dimensions, San Rafael, California.
Ericsson, K. A., and Staszewski, J. J. (1989). Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance. In Klahr, D., and Kotovsky, K. (eds.),Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbet A. Simon, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Fisk, A. D., and Eboch, M. (1989). An automatic/controlled processing theory application to training component map reading skills.Applied Ergonomics, 20: 2–8.
Frick, R. W. (1989). Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.Memory and Cognition, 17: 551–562.
Gagne, R. M. (1985).The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Gick, M. L. (1985). The effect of a diagram retrieval cue on spontaneous analogical transfer.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39: 460–466.
Gick, M. L., and Holyoak, K. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology, 15: 1–38.
Gilhooly, K. J., Wood, M., Kinnear, P. R., and Green, C. (1988). Skill in map reading and memory for maps.Quarterly Journal of Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 40: 87–107.
Goldsmith, E. (1984).Research into Illustration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goldsmith, E. (1987). The analysis of illustration in theory and practice. In Houghton, H. A., and Willows, D. M. (eds.),The Psychology of Illustration. Vol. 2. Instructional Issues, Springer, New York.
Gollin, E. S., and Sharps, M. J. (1987, August). The encoding and retrieval of object locations by young and elderly adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Goodman, N. (1968).The Languages of Art, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1988a). Impact of diagrams on recalling sequential elements in expository texts.Reading Psychology, 9: 121–139.
Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1988b). The interrelationships between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts.Instructional Science, 17: 219–234.
Hardwick, D. A., Woolridge, S. C., and Rinalducci, E. J., (1983). Selection of landmarks as a correlate of cognitive map organization.Psychological Reports, 53: 807–813.
Holliday, W. G., Brunner, L. L., and Donais, E. L. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14: 129–138.
Hoffman, D. D., and Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition.Cognition, 18: 65–96.
Isa, B. S., Evey, R. J., McVey, B. W., and Neal, A. S. (1985). An empirical comparison of two metalanguages.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23: 215–229.
Johnson, D. D., Pittelman, S. D., and Heimlich, J. E. (1986). Semantic mapping.Reading Teacher, 39: 778–783.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1986).Mental Models, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jonassen, D., and Hawk, P. (1984). Using graphic organizers in instruction.Information Design Journal, 4: 58–68.
Kerst, S. M., Howard, J. H., and Gugerty, L. J. (1987). Judgment accuracy in pair-distance estimation and map sketching.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25: 185–188.
Kimchi, R. (1988). Selection attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns.Perception and Psychophysics, 43: 189–198.
Kinchla, R. A., and Wolfe, J. (1979). The order visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out”?Perception and Psychophysics, 25: 225–230.
Kinnear, P. R., and Wood, M. (1987). Memory for topographical contour maps.British Journal of Psychology, 78: 395–402.
Knowlton, J. Q. (1966). On the definition of ‘picture.’AV Communication Review, 14: 157–183.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1986).Image and Mind (2nd ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kosslyn, S. M., Simcox, W. A., Pinker, S., and Parkin, L. P. (1983). Understanding charts and graphs: A project in applied cognitive psychology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 238 687.
Kovach, R. C., Surrette, M. A., and Aamodt, M. G. (1988). Following informal street maps: Effects of map design.Environment and Behavior, 20: 683–699.
Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., and Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10: 28–37.
Kulhavy, R. W., Schwartz, N. H., and Shaha, S. H. (1983). Spatial representation of maps.American Journal of Psychology, 96: 337–351.
Landau, B. (1986). Early map use as an unlearned ability.Cognition, 22: 201–223.
Larkin, J. H., and Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.Cognitive Science, 11: 65–99.
Leiser, D., Tzelgov, J., and Henik, A. (1987). A comparison of map study methods: Simulated travel vs. conventional study.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7: 317–334.
Lesaga, M. I. (1989). Gestalts and their components: Nature of information precedence. In Shepp, B. E., and Ballesteros, S. (eds.),Object Perception: Structure and Process, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 165–202.
Lindvall, C. M., Tamburino, J. L., and Robinson, L. (1982). An exploratory investigation of the effect of teaching primary grade children to use specific problem-solving strategies in solving simple story problems. Paper presented at the conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March (ED 216904).
MacDonald-Ross, M. (1979). Scientific diagrams and the generation of plausible hypotheses: An essay in the history of ideas.Instructional Science, 8: 223–234.
Mangan, J. (1978). Cultural conventions of pictorial representation: Iconic literacy and education.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26: 245–267.
Mani, K., and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions.Memory and Cognition, 10: 181–187.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision, Freeman, New York.
Marr, D., and Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 200: 269–294.
McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology, 18: 87–121.
Merrill, M. D., and Tennyson, R. D. (1977).Teaching Concepts: An Instructional Design Guide, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63: 81–97.
Moore, D. W., and Readance, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research.Journal of Educational Research, 78: 11–17.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., and Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 26: 165–187.
Moxley, R. (1983). Educational diagrams.Instructional Science, 12: 147–160.
Moyer, J. C., Sowder, L., Threadgill-Sowder, J., and Moyer, M. B. (1984). Story problem formats: Drawn versus verbal versus telegraphic.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15: 342–351.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology, 9: 353–383.
Norman, D. A., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Memory and knowledge. In Norman, D. A., and Rumelhart, D. E. (eds.),Explorations in Cognition, Freeman, San Francisco.
Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. (1984).Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Paivio, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In Yuille, J. C. (ed.).Imagery, Memory and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 310–332.
Paquet, L., and Merikle, P. M. (1984). Global precedence: The effect of exposure duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38: 45–53.
Peruch, P., Pailhous, J., and Deutsch, C. (1986). How do we locate ourselves on a map: A method for analyzing self-localization processes.Acta Psychologica, 61: 71–88.
Pinker, S. (1985). Visual cognition: An introduction. In Pinker, S. (ed.),Visual Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1981). Perceptual organization in information processing. In Kubovy, M., and Pomerantz, J. R. (eds.),Perceptual Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In Schwab, E. C., and Nusbaum, H. C. (eds.),Pattern Recognition by Humans and Machines. Vol. 2, Visual Perception, Academic Press, New York.
Pomerantz, J. R., and Garner, W. R. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks.Perception and Psychophysics, 14: 565–569.
Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A., and Carson, C. E. (1989). Attention and object perception. In Shepp, B. E., and Ballesteros, S. (eds.),Object Perception: Structure and Process, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 53–90.
Pomerantz, J. R., and Schwaitzberg, S. D. (1975). Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures.Perception and Psychophysics, 18: 355–361.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984).Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Reigeluth, C. M., and Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.),Instructional Design Theories and Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 335–381.
Remington, R. and Williams, D. (1986). On the selection and evaluation of visual display symbology: Factors influencing search and identification times.Human Factors, 28: 407–420.
Riding, R. J., and Boardman, D. J. (1983). The relationship between sex and learning style and graphicacy in 14-year-old children.Educational Review, 35: 69–79.
Rock, I. (1986). The description and analysis of object and event perception. In Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L., and Thomas, J. P. (eds.),The Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. 2, pp. 33-1 – 33-71.
Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573–605.
Saariluoma, P., and Sajaniemi, J. (1989). Visual information chunking in spreadsheet calculation.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30: 475–488.
Salomon, G. (1979).Interaction of Media, Cognition and Learning, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
Salomon, G. (1983, April). How students decide when to invest more mental effort in learning. Annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
Samet, M. G., Geiselman, R. E., and Landee, B. M. (1982). Human performance evaluation of graphic symbol-design features.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54: 1303–1310.
Schlichtmann, H. (1985). Characteristic traits of the semiotic system “Map symbolism.”The Cartographic Journal, 22: 23–30.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1980). Heuristics in the classroom. In Krulik, S., and Reys, R. E. (eds.),Problem Solving in School Mathematics, Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
Schwartz, N. H. (1988). Cognitive processing characteristics of maps: Implications for instruction.Educational and Psychological Research, 8: 93–101.
Schwartz, N. H., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1987). Map structure and the comprehension of prose.Educational and Psychological Research, 7: 113–128.
Schwartz, N. H., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1988). Encoding tactics in the retention of maps.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13: 72–85.
Schwartz, R. M., and Raphael, T. E. (1985). Concept of definition: A key to improving students' vocabulary.The Reading Teacher, 39: 198–205.
Seddon, G. M., Adeola, A., el-Farra, A. O., and Oyediji, S. I. (1984). The responsiveness of students to pictorial depth cues and the understanding of diagrams of three-dimensional structures.British Educational Research Journal, 10: 49–62.
Seddon, G. M., and Eniaiyeju, P. A. (1986). The understanding of pictorial depth cues, and the ability to visualize the rotation of three-dimensional structures in diagrams.Research in Science and Technological Education, 4: 29–37.
Seddon, G. M., Eniaiyeju, P. A., and Jusoh, I. (1984). The visualization of rotation in diagrams of three-dimensional structures.American Educational Research Journal, 21: 25–38.
Seddon, G. M., and Shubber, K. E. (1984). The effects of presentation mode and colour in teaching the visualization of rotation in diagrams of molecular structures.Research in Science and Technological Education, 2: 167–176.
Seddon, G. M., and Shubber, K. E. (1985). Learning the visualization of three-dimensional spatial relationships in diagrams at different ages in Bahrain.Research in Science and Technological Education, 3: 97–108.
Sharps, M. J., and Gollin, E. S. (1988). Aging and free recall for objects located in space.Journal of Gerontology, 43: 8–11.
Shepard, R. N., and Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental Images and Their Transformations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sholl, M. J., and Egeth, H. E. (1982). Cognitive correlates of map-reading ability.Intelligence, 6: 215–230.
Smith, C. D. (1984). The relationship between pleasingness of landmarks and the judgement of distance in cognitive maps.Journal of Environmental Education, 4: 229–234.
Streeter, L. A., and Vitello, D. (1986). A profile of drivers' map-reading abilities.Human Factors, 28: 223–239.
Sutherland, S., and Winn, W. D. (1987, February). The effect of the number and nature of features and of general ability on the simultaneous and successive processing of maps. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta.
Sutherland, S., and Winn, W. D. (1990). Recall of the features and layout of maps as a function of feature clustering. Unpublished paper.
Szlichcinski, K. P. (1980). The syntax of pictorial instruction. In Kolers, P. A., Wrolstad, M. E., and Bouma, H. (eds.),Processing Visible Language, Vol. II, Plenum Press, New York.
Thomas, J. L. (1985). Visual memory: Adult age differences in map recall and learning strategies.Experimental Aging Research, 11: 93–95.
Thorndyke, P. W., and Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge from maps and navigation.Cognitive Psychology, 14: 560–589.
Thorndyke, P. W., and Stasz, C. (1980). Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps.Cognitive Psychology, 12: 137–175.
Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics.Educational Psychologist, 24: 213–227.
Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual perception.Scientific American, 255: 114–125.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Barlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 40A: 210–237.
Treisman, A., and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology, 12: 97–136.
Uttal, W. R. (1988).On Seeing Forms, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Waller, R. (1981, April). Understanding network diagrams. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April.
Winn, W. D. (1981). The effect of attribute highlighting and spatial organization on identification and classification.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18: 23–32.
Winn, W. D. (1982). The role of diagrammatic representation in learning sequences, identification and classification as a function of verbal and spatial ability.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19: 79–89.
Winn, W. D. (1983). Perceptual strategies used with flow diagrams having normal and unanticipated formats.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57: 751–762.
Winn, W. D. (1986). Knowledge of task, ability and strategy in the processing of letter patterns.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63: 726.
Winn, W. D. (1988). Recall of the pattern, sequence and names of concepts presented in instructional diagrams.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25: 375–386.
Winn, W. D. (1989a). The design and use of instructional graphics. In Mandl, H., and Levin, J. R. (eds.),Knowledge Acquisition from Test and Pictures, Elsevier, New York, pp. 125–144.
Winn, W. D. (1989b). The role of graphics in training documents: Toward an explanatory theory of how they communicate.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32: 300–309.
Winn, W. D. (1989c, March). Evidence for bias in the interpretation of simple diagrams. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Winn, W. D. (1990). A theoretical framework for research on learning from graphics.International Journal of Educational Research. 14: 553–564.
Winn, W. D., and Everett, R. J. (1979). Affective rating of color and black-and-white pictures.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 27: 148–156.
Winn, W. D., and Holliday, W. G. (1982). Design principles for diagrams and charts. In Jonassen, D. (ed.),The Technology of Text, Vol. 1, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 277–299.
Winn, W. D., and Sutherland, S. W. (1989). Factors influencing the recall of elements in maps and diagrams and the strategies used to encode them.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 33–39.
Zavotka, S. L. (1987). Three-dimensional computer animated graphics: A tool for spatial skill instruction.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 35: 133–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winn, W. Learning from maps and diagrams. Educ Psychol Rev 3, 211–247 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320077
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320077