Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to identify in vitro fertilization (IVF) candidates' motives for parenthood and hence for seeking treatment. The relationship among identified motives, pretreatment emotional adjustment, and reaction to treatment failure was then examined. Women as a group placed greatest emphasis on fulfilling gender-role requirements, and those strongly endorsing such motives showed the poorest adjustment before IVF and the most negative reaction to first-cycle failure. In contrast, men in general were more likely to stress a desire for marital completion, although this motive was not predictive of emotional status before or after IVF. However, men experiencing social pressures to have children were at greater risk when treatment failed. The results indicate that greater consideration of cognitive factors may enhance understanding of emotional reactions to IVF failure and provide important insights for therapeutic intervention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Menning BE: The emotional needs of infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1980;34:313–319
Paulson JD, Haarman BS, Salerno RL, Asmar P: An investigation of the relationship between emotional maladjustment and infertility. Fertil Steril 1988;49:258–262
Dennerstein L, Morse C: Psychological issues in IVF. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985;12:835–846
Newton CR, Hearn MT, Yuzpe AA: Psychological assessment and follow-up after in vitro fertilization: Assessing the impact of failure. Fertil Steril 1990;54:379–387
Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G: Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York, Guilford Press, 1979
Novaco RW: Anger and coping with stress: Cognitive behavioural interventions.In Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Research and Applications, JP Foreyt, DP Rathjen (eds). New York, Plenum, 1978, pp 135–173
Beck AT, Emery G: Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective. New York, Basic Books, 1985
Seibel M, Levin S: A new era in reproductive technologies: The emotional stages of in vitro fertilization. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:135–139
Williams LS: “It's going to work for me.” Responses to failures of IVF. Birth 1988;15:153–156
Leiblum SR, Kemmann E, Colburn D, Pasquale S, DeLisi AM: Unsuccessful in vitro fertilization: A follow-up study. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:46–50
Adler JA, Boxley RL: The psychological reactions to infertility: Sex roles and coping styles. Sex Roles 1985;12:271–279
Veevers JE: The social meaning of parenthood. Psychiatry 1973;36:291–310
Littlejohn P: In-Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Questionnaire. Victoria, School of Social Work, Phillip Institute of Technology, 1982 (unpublished data)
Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Scale. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983
Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG: Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8:77–100
Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL: The Quality of American Life. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1976
Hollingshead AB: Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT, Department of Sociology, Yale University, 1975 (unpublished data)
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariable Statistics. New York, Harper & Row, 1983
Miall CE: Perceptions of informed sanctioning and the stigma of involuntary childlessness. Deviant Behav 1985;6:383–403
Mahlstedt PP: The psychological component of infertility. Fertil Steril 1985;43:335–346
Wortman CB, Silver RC: The myths of coping with loss. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:349–357
Kendall PC: Cognitive processes and procedures.In Annual Review of Behaviour Therapy: Theory and practice (Vol 10), GT Wilson, CM Franks (eds). New York, Guilford Press, 1984, pp 126–148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newton, C.R., Hearn, M.T., Yuzpe, A.A. et al. Motives for parenthood and response to failed in vitro fertilization: Implications for counseling. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 24–31 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204110
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204110