Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of cognitive distortion in a clinically depressed population

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cognitive Bias Questionnaire, the Present State Examination, the Beck Depression Inventory, and an expectancy of success measure were administered to depressed and nondepressed psychiatric inpatients. The depressed subjects selected significantly more depressed distortions on the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire than did the nondepressed subjects. Results also revealed that depressed distortion scores from the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire correlated significantly with measures of cognitive distortion obtained from the Beck Depression Inventory, the Present State Examination, and an experimental task. Although primary and secondary depressed groups did not differ significantly in their responses to the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire, depressed subjects who endorsed high levels of depressed distortion revealed significantly more cognitive symptoms of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory and the Present State Examination, and evidenced a nonsignificant trend to expect less success prior to an experimental task. Implications of these results for future research in this area are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiskal, H. S. A biobehavioral approach to depression. In R. A. DePue (Ed.),The psychobiology of depressive disorders: Implications for the effects of stress. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, N. C., & Winokur, G. Secondary depression: Familial, clinical, and research perspectives.American Journal of Psychiatry 1979,136 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T.Depression: Clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T.Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960,20 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, W. C. Away from a unitary model of depression.Behavior Therapy 1980,11 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L., and Krantz, S. Effect of success and failure on depressive cognitions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1976,85 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, S., & Hammen, C. L. Assessment of cognitive bias in depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1979,88 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, A., Beck, A. T., & Diggory, J. Differential effects of success and failure on depressed and nondepressed patients.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1971,152 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, I. W., & Norman, W. H. The effects of attributions for success on the alleviation of learned helplessness and depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1981,90 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. Research diagnostic criteria.Archives of General Psychiatry 1978,35 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weckowicz, T. E., Muir, W., & Cropley, A. J. A factor analysis of the Beck inventory of depression.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1967,31 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weed, L. L.Medical records, medical education, and patient care. Cleveland: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E., & Sartorius, N.Measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. A., Goodwin, D. W., & Guze, S. B.Psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, W.H., Miller, I.W. & Klee, S.H. Assessment of cognitive distortion in a clinically depressed population. Cogn Ther Res 7, 133–140 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01190066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01190066

Keywords

Navigation