Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of imagery content, choice of imagery content, and self-verbalization on the self-control of pain

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ninety female students in a general psychology class at the University of Missouri-Columbia volunteered to be exposed to pre- and posttests of ice water tolerance. They were divided into eight experimental groups in a 2 × 2 × 2 design and one attention-placebo control group. The main independent variables were imagery content (pleasant versus neutral scenes), choice of imagery content (choice versus yoked), and self-verbalization (SV) (preplanned explicit SV versus no SV). The two main dependent variables were changes from pre- to posttests in actual tolerance and in self-reported pain. After both pre- and posttests, subjects rated their involvement in imagery (percent of time spent in imagery and vividness of imagery). A three-way ANOVA revealed that for increases in tolerance, significant main effects were found for choice of content (choice greater than yoked) and for SV (SV greater than no SV). Imagery content (pleasant versus neutral) was not significant. No ANOVA interactions were significant. For decreases in selfreported pain the only significant effect was choice (choice greater than yoked). Only two experimental groups had greater changes in tolerance than the attention-placebo group; no group had greater changes in selfreported pain than the control group. For vividness of posttest imagery, pleasant imagery was greater than neutral imagery, choice was greater than yoked, and SV was greater than no SV. A measure of vividness of visual imagery, completed by subjects prior to their exposure to ice water, was a weak predictor of changes in tolerance and self-reported pain from pre- to posttests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  • Barber, T. X.Cognitive strategies and cognitive style: Some behavioral implications. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1977.

References

  • Averill, J. R. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychological Bulletin 1973,80 286–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1977,1 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X., & Cooper, B. J. Effects on pain of experimentally induced and spontaneous distraction.Psychological Reports 1972,31 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. K. Quantification of the subjective pain experience. In P. H. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.),Psychopathology of perception. Grune & Stratton, 1965.

  • Brown, R. A., Fader, K., & Barber, T. X. Responsiveness to pain: Stimulus specificity versus generality.Psychological Record 1973,23 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, J. F., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive strategies, experimenter modeling, and expectation in the attenuation of pain.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrah, N. L., & Boffa, J. Perceived control, self-observation, and response to aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D. C., Singer, J. E., & Friedman, L. N. Psychic cost of adaptation to an environmental stressor.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,12 200–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, L., & Kanfer, F. H. Tolerance of aversive stimulation.Behavior Therapy 1976,7 593–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, J. J. “In vivo” emotive imagery: A technique for reducing childbirth anxiety and discomfort.Psychological Reports 1973,32 1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, J. J. Coping with inescapable discomfort throughin vivo emotive imagery. In J. D. Krumboltz & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.),Counseling methods. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, J. J., Layng, F. C., & Pursell, C. H. Preliminary study of effects of “in vivo” emotive imagery on dental discomfort.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976,42 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H. The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.),Behavioral self-management: Strategies, techniques, and outcomes. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Know, V. J. Cognitive strategies for coping with pain: Ignoring versus acknowledging (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo [Canada], 1972).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973,34, 2308B.

  • Langer, E. J., Janis, I. L., & Wolfer, J. A. Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1975,11 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. The function of the illusions of control and freedom.American Psychologist 1973,28 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levendusky, P., & Pankratz, L. Self-control techniques as an alternative to pain medication.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1975,84 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology 1973,64 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Turk, D. The cognitive-behavioral management of anxiety, anger and pain. In P. Davidson (Ed.),Behavioral management of anxiety, depression and pain. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, R. W. J. The effect of experimentally altered cognitive appraisal of pain tolerance.Psychonomic Science 1970,20 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, R. W. J., & Davidson, P. O. The effects of vicarious and cognitive rehearsal on pain tolerance.Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1971,15 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. S., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive control of pain: Effects of multiple cognitive strategies.Psychological Record 1977,2 373–383. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. S., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive control of pain: Four serendipitous results.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1977,44 569–570. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, N. P., Horton, C., & Chaves, J. F. The effects of two cognitive strategies on pain threshold.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1975,84 677–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E., Tursky, B., & Schwartz, G. Self-control and predictability: Their effects on reactions to aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,18 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisenberg, M. Pain and pain control.Psychological Bulletin 1977,84 1008–1044.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a dissertation submitted to the University of Missouri, Columbia. The author gratefully acknowledges the help of his advisor, Robert H. Dolliver, and the assistance of Charles J. Krauskopf, Lois A. Huebner, C. Steven Richards, Terry D. TenBrink, and William F. Waters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worthington, E.L. The effects of imagery content, choice of imagery content, and self-verbalization on the self-control of pain. Cogn Ther Res 2, 225–240 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01185785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01185785

Keywords

Navigation