Abstract
Numerous conceptual and statistical difficulties complicate the use of raw thought frequencies in cognitive assessment. To overcome such problems, investigators have used a variety of ratio scores; however, these are not easily comparable across studies and their use evokes a variety of associated difficulties. Therefore, the present investigation compared results using raw frequencies and a variety of ratio scores on a cognitive assessment task where both the valence and the focus of attention of thoughts were examined. Scores evaluated included a positive/negative ratio as well as Schwartz's States of Mind (SOM) ratio [positive/(positive +negative)] with and without correction of zero frequencies of either positive or negative thoughts. Results indicate that (a) partitioning thoughts as a function of attentional focus (self, other, situation-focused thoughts) yield different frequencies and ratios for each thought type, (b) positive and negative thoughts are independent, (c) although different ratios and correlations are appropriate, depending on the nature of the assessment task, results using the SOM ratio with a correction factor most closely resemble results obtained when using frequencies, (d) when a positive/negative ratio is used, a correction factor and a log transformation reduce the effects of missing data and of positive skewness, and (e) the mean of subjects' SOM ratios and the ratio of subjects' mean frequencies yield similar results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acton, R. G., & Cameron, R. (1985, November).Cognitive deficit in a stressful situation: Deficient repertoire or production failure? Paper presented at the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy annual convention.
Amsel, R., & Fichten, C. S. (1988). Effects of contact on thoughts about interaction with students who have a physical disability.Journal of Rehabilitation, 54 61–65.
Clark, D. A. (1988). The validity of measures of cognition: A review of the literature.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12 1–20.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 37–46.
Ferguson, G. (1986).Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fichten, C. S. (1986). Self, other and situation-referent automatic thoughts: Interaction between people who have a physical disability and those who do not.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10 571–587.
Fichten, C. S., & Amsel, R. (1988). Thoughts concerning interaction between college students who have a physical disability and their nondisabled peers.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 32 22–40.
Fichten, C. S., Amsel, R., & Robillard, K. (1988). Issues in cognitive assessment: Task difficulty, reactivity of measurement, thought listing vs. inventory approaches, sequences vs. frequency counts.Behavioral Assessment, 10 399–425.
Fichten, C. S., Bourdon, C. V., Amsel, R., & Fox, L. (1987). Validation of the College Interaction Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Students with and without disabilities.Journal of College Student Personnel, 28(5), 449–458.
Fichten, C. S., & Martos, J. G. (1986). Cognition coding manual: Interaction between ablebodied and physically disabled people.Abstracted in Resources in Education, 21(5), 50–51. (Eric Document Reproduction Service, ED No. 264679)
Fichten, C. S., Tagalakis, V., & Amsel, R. (in press). Effects of cognitive modeling affect and previous contact on attitudes, thoughts and feelings toward college students with physical disabilities.Journal of the Multihandicapped Person.
Galassi, J. P., Frierson, H. T., Jr., & Sharer, R. (1981a). Behavior of high, moderate and low test anxious students during an actual test situation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 51–62.
Galassi, J. P., Frierson, H. T., Jr., & Sharer, R. (1981b). Concurrent versus retrospective assessment in test anxiety research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 614–615.
Heimberg, R. G., Acerra, M. C., & Holstein, A. (1985). Partner similarity mediates interpersonal anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9 443–453.
Heimberg, R. G., Keller, K. E., & Peca-Baker, T. (1986). Cognitive assessment of social-evaluative anxiety in the job interview: Job Interview Self-Statement Schedule.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33 190–195.
Hollandsworth, J. G., Glazeski, R. C., Kirkland, K., Jones, G. E., & VanNorman, L. R. (1979). Analysis of the nature and effects of test anxiety: Cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological components.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3 165–180.
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., Zollo, L., Nyman, D. J., & O'Brien, G. T. (1987).Thought listing in the natural environment: Valence and focus of listed thoughts among socially anxious and nonanxious subjects. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Albany, presented at the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy annual convention, Boston.
Ingram, R. E., & Kendall, P. C. (1987). The cognitive side of anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11 523–526.
Ingram, R. E., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Assessment of positive automatic cognition.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 898–902.
Kendall, P. C. (1984). Behavioral assessment and methodology. In G. T. Wilson, C. M. Franks, K. D. Brownell, & P. C. Kendall (Eds.),Annual review of behavior therapy: Theory and practice (Vol. 9, pp. 39–94). New York: Guilford Press.
Kendall, P. C. & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Methods in the measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 85–118). New York: Academic Press.
Kendall, P. C., & Ingram, R. (1987). The future for cognitive assessment: Let's get specific. In L. Michelson & L. M. Asher (Eds.),Anxiety and stress disorders: Cognitive-behavioral assessment and treatment (pp. 89–104). New York: Guilford Press.
Kruskal, J. B. (1968). Special problems of statistical analyses II: Transformations of data. In D. L. Sills (Ed.),International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 182–193). New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
Marchione, K. E., Michelson, L., Greenwald, M., & Dancu, C. (1987). Cognitive behavioral treatment of agoraphobia.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25 319–328.
Missel, P., & Sommer, G. (1983). Depression and self-verbalization.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7 141–148.
Myszka, M. T., Galassi, J. P., & Ware, W. (1986). Comparison of cognitive assessment methods with heterosocially anxious college women.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33 401–407.
O'Leary, K. D., & Kent, R. (1973). Behavior modification for social action: Research tactics and problems. In L. A. Hammerlynck, L. C. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior change methodology, concepts and practice (pp. 69–96). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Schwartz, R. M. (1986). The internal dialogue: On the asymmetry between positive and negative coping thoughts.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10 591–605.
Schwartz, R. M., & Garamoni, G. L. (1986a). A structural model of positive and negative states of mind: Asymmetry in the internal dialogue. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 5, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, R. M., & Garamoni, G. L. (1986b). Cognitive assessment: A multibehaviormultimethod-multiperspective approach.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 8 185–197.
Schwartz, R. M., & Garamoni, G. L. (1989). Cognitive balance and psychopathology: Evaluation of information processing model of positive and negative states of mind.Clinical Psychology Review, 9 271–294.
Schwartz, R. M., & Gottman, J. (1976). Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44 910–920.
Schwartz, R. M., & Michelson, L. (1987). States-of-mind model: Cognitive balance in the treatment of agoraphobia.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 557–565.
Smith, J. E. K. (1976). Data transformation in analysis of variance.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15 339–346.
Yuker, H. E., Block, J., & Younng, J. (1970).The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was funded by F.C.A.R. We would like to thank Jackie Cohen, John Martos, Sue McKenzie, Alan Ross, Soryl Soiferman, Vicki Tagalakis, and Valerie Turner, without whose assistance this study would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Robert Schwartz for his comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and for his valuable suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amsel, R., Fichten, C.S. Ratio versus frequency scores: Focus of attention and the balance between positive and negative thoughts. Cogn Ther Res 14, 257–277 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183996
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183996