Skip to main content
Log in

Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-efficacy theory maintains that self-efficacy expectancy, a belief about one's ability to successfully perform a behavior, is independent of outcome expectancy, a belief about the likelihood of the behavior leading to a specific outcome. This experiment tested the hypothesis that self-efficacy and outcome expectancy are independent and have independent effects on behavior change. Subjects read communications that differed in descriptions of the difficulty of learning and performing a behavior (self-efficacy expectancy) and the effectiveness of the behavior in producing a desired outcome (outcome expectancy). Results disclosed that increments in outcome expectancy increased intentions to perform the behavior. Increments in self-efficacy expectancy yielded nonsignificant increases in intentions. Also, the outcome expectancy manipulation influenced expectations of self-efficacy. When the behavior was presented as relatively difficult to perform, subjects who believed that the behavior was more likely to result in a favorable outcome expressed greater confidence in their ability to perform the behavior than those who perceived a relatively weak relationship between the behavior and its outcome. It was suggested that the degree of risk involved in attempting yet failing to perform correctly a behavior may determine the extent to which self-efficacy expectancy affects decisions about behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1980,4 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, R. C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review 1972,79 394–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C. L. Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens.Psychological Bulletin 1979,86 1350–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. W., & Mewborn, C. R. Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of the coping responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,34 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An expanded version of this article is available upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maddux, J.E., Sherer, M. & Rogers, R.W. Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions. Cogn Ther Res 6, 207–211 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183893

Keywords

Navigation