Abstract
Self-efficacy theory maintains that self-efficacy expectancy, a belief about one's ability to successfully perform a behavior, is independent of outcome expectancy, a belief about the likelihood of the behavior leading to a specific outcome. This experiment tested the hypothesis that self-efficacy and outcome expectancy are independent and have independent effects on behavior change. Subjects read communications that differed in descriptions of the difficulty of learning and performing a behavior (self-efficacy expectancy) and the effectiveness of the behavior in producing a desired outcome (outcome expectancy). Results disclosed that increments in outcome expectancy increased intentions to perform the behavior. Increments in self-efficacy expectancy yielded nonsignificant increases in intentions. Also, the outcome expectancy manipulation influenced expectations of self-efficacy. When the behavior was presented as relatively difficult to perform, subjects who believed that the behavior was more likely to result in a favorable outcome expressed greater confidence in their ability to perform the behavior than those who perceived a relatively weak relationship between the behavior and its outcome. It was suggested that the degree of risk involved in attempting yet failing to perform correctly a behavior may determine the extent to which self-efficacy expectancy affects decisions about behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1980,4 39–66.
Bolles, R. C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review 1972,79 394–409.
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 235–244.
Olson, C. L. Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens.Psychological Bulletin 1979,86 1350–1352.
Rogers, R. W., & Mewborn, C. R. Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of the coping responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,34 54–61.
Vroom, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An expanded version of this article is available upon request.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maddux, J.E., Sherer, M. & Rogers, R.W. Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions. Cogn Ther Res 6, 207–211 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183893
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183893