Skip to main content
Log in

Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foa and Kozak (1985, 1986) have proposed that agoraphobics are characterized by a fear structure in which information about physiological arousal is associated in memory with information about danger. Accordingly, agoraphobics should be more likely than normals to interpret ambiguous bodily stimuli as threatening. They are also expected to exaggerate the probability and cost of unpleasant events related to arousal more than of events unrelated to arousal. Three groups — untreated and treated agoraphobics, and normals — were administered three questionnaires designed to test these conjectures. Agoraphobics, but not normals, manifested the hypothesized cognitive biases. Moreover, these biases were greatly diminished in agoraphobics who had undergone cognitive-behavior therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1972).Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: Meridian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Laude, R., & Bohnert, M. (1979). Ideational components of anxiety neurosis.Archives of General Psychiatry, 31 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979).Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, I. S., Jones, L. M., Robertson, S. A., Radcliffe, W. N., & Emerson, E. (1981). The degree of control exerted by phobic and non-phobic verbal stimuli over the recognition behaviour of phobic and non-phobic subjects.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. T. (1974). Compulsive neurosis: A review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin, 81 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., Caputo, G. C., Briught, P., & Gallagher, R. (1984). Assessment of fear of fear in agoraphobics: The Body Sensations Questionnaire and the Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52 1090–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Teasdale, J. D. (1982). Diurnal variation in clinical depression and accessibility of memories of positive and negative experiences.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Harper, R. (1975).A new guide to rational living. North Hollywood, California: Wilshire Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1985). Treatment of anxiety disorders: Implications for psychopathology. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.),Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.Psychological Bulletin, 99 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Sensitivity to feared stimuli in obsessive-compulsives: A dichotic listening analysis.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentil, M. L. F., & Lader, M. (1978). Dream content and daytime attitudes in anxious and calm women.Psychological Medicine, 8 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. J., & Chambless, D. L. (1978). A reanalysis of agoraphobia.Behavior Therapy, 9 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, G. A. (1984). Ideational components of anxiety: Their origin and content.British Journal of Psychiatry, 144 618–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. (1984). Cognition in emotion: Concept and action. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.),Emotion, cognition, and behavior (pp. 192–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (1984, September).Cognitive processes in generalised anxiety. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Association for Behavior Therapy, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & Shaw, P. (1977). Cognitions related to anxiety: A pilot study of treatment.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. B., & Rao, P. A. (1985). Longitudinal study of cognitions, life events, and depression in psychiatric inpatients.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, C. (1976).Simple, effective treatment of agoraphobia. New York: Hawthorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The order of authorship is arbitrary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNally, R.J., Foa, E.B. Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cogn Ther Res 11, 567–581 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183859

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183859

Key words

Navigation