Skip to main content
Log in

Rational-emotive theory: II. explication and evaluation

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to previous formulation of rational-emotive theory, the present formulation is based on comprehensively critical rationalism (rather than logical empiricism), identifies negative evaluations (bad, wrong, awful) as the specific etiology of unwanted (dysphoric) emotions, and clarifies the definitional nature of such evaluations. In contrast, other cognitive-behavioral theories emphasize external events, faulty inferences, or the client's perception or construal of the situation as the source of the undesired emotional responses. It is difficult to choose among these theories because the purported etiological agents are confounded, and we do not have adequate measures of the degree to which people hold and understand various beliefs. Individuals can confirm the theory by noting their emotional reactions to those specific beliefs identified as irrational in this formulation. Dysphoric emotions (anger, anxiety, depression, guilt, jealousy, and shame) result, to a considerable extent, from fundamentalist, absolutistic, moral beliefs, and might be largely eliminated if children were no longer indoctrinated with these points of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society.American Psychologist, 41 891–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W. W., III (1984).The retreat to commitment (2nd ed.). LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967).Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962).Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1980). Rational-emotive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy: Similarities and differences.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1984). The essence of RET — 1984.Journal of Rational Emotive Therapy, 2(1), 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1987). A sadly neglected cognitive element in depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fösterling, F. (1986). Attributional conceptions in clinical psychology.American Psychologist, 41 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaga, D. A., & Davison, G. C. (1989). Outcome studies of rational-emotive therapy. In M. E. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe (Eds.),Inside RET: A critical appraisal of the theory and therapy of Albert Ellis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Lamb, R. (Eds.). (1983).The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouff, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (1986). Development and validation of a measure of irrational belief.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54 860–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouff, J. M., Valdenegro, J., & Schutte, N. S. (1987). Further validation of a measure of irrational belief.Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy, 5 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia.American Psychologist, 17 827–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1964).Manual for use with checklist of schizotypic signs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Medical School, Psychiatric Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977).Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., & Bolton, W. (1985). A social-cognitive theory of depression in reaction to life events.Psychological Review, 92 372–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1983).Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N. V., Heerboth, J. R., & Schill, T. R. (1987). Measurement of irrational beliefs: A critical review. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 6). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G. (1989). Rational-emotive theory: I. An integrated psychological and philosophical basis.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1982). Irrational beliefs in the cause and treatment of emotional distress: A critical review of the rational-emotive model.Clinical Psychology Review, 2 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Allred, K. D. (1986). Rationality revisited: A reassessment of the empirical support for the rational-emotive model. In P. E. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 5, pp. 63–87). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A., & Elliott, R. (1986). “Are all psychotherapies equivalent?”American Psychologist, 41 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thebarge, R. T. (1989). Development of a context-relevant test of irrational thinking (Doctoral dissertation, Miami University, 1989).

  • Walen, S. R., DiGiuseppe, R., & Wessler, R. L. (1980).A practitioner's guide to rational-emotive therapy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. A., & Wessler, R. L. (1980).The principles and practice of rational-emotive therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This project was supported, in part, by Grant MH-39077 from the National Institute of Mental Health. William Chaplin, Raymond DiGiuseppe, Timothy G. Dowd, Albert Ellis, Lewis R. Goldberg, Laury Goolsby, Sarah E. Hampson, William H. Hendricks, Bobbie G. Hopes, Oliver P. John, Dean Peabody, Tina K. Rosolack, William B. Stiles, Ronald W. Thebarge, Denise M. Town, and an anonymous reviewer all made many helpful suggestions in response to earlier versions of this manuscript. I am indebted to them all.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rorer, L.G. Rational-emotive theory: II. explication and evaluation. Cogn Ther Res 13, 531–548 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176066

Key words

Navigation