Abstract
Cognitive restructuring can be thought of as having two goals: a coping goal, in which individuals learn to cope more effectively with a stressful situation using such means as coping self-statements, and a restructuring goal, in which individuals change their beliefs about events, so that formerly stressful situations will no longer be stressful. These two goals were contrasted in a treatment outcome study employing test-anxious subjects who were assigned (a) to a coping treatment, which taught coping self-statements to be used in a test situation, (b) to a restructuring treatment, which involved discussion of general beliefs about evaluation, or (c) to a waiting list control. Outcome measures of test anxiety, irrational beliefs, and thoughts 1 hour before a final exam each showed treatment effects. Though the treated groups did not differ from each other on these measures, the coping group showed more improvement relative to the control group. The results for the two cognitive measures, chosen to reflect the different goals of the two treatments, did not directly correspond to treatment content, suggesting that the change processes resulting from a treatment cannot be predicted from the content of the treatment procedures alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnkoff, D. B. (1983). Common and specific factors in cognitive therapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.),Psychotherapy and patient relationships (pp. 185–215). Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3 257–260.
Brown, S. D., & Nelson, T. L. (1983). Beyond the uniformity myth: A comparison of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious college students.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30 367–374.
Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3 249–262.
Denney, D. R. (1980). Self-control approaches to the treatment of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 209–243). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Evans, M. D., & Bemis, K. M. (1982). Can psychotherapies for depression be discriminated? A systematic investigation of cognitive therapy and interpersonal therapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 744–756.
Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1982). Think cognitively: Selected issues in cognitive assessment and therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 35–71). New York: Academic Press.
Goldfried, M. R., Linehan, M. M., & Smith, J. L. (1978). Reduction of test anxiety through cognitive restructuring.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 32–39.
Husek, T. R., & Alexander, S. (1963). The effectiveness of the Anxiety Differential in examination stress situations.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23 309–318.
Jones, R. G. (1969). A factored measure of Ellis' irrational belief system, with personality and adjustment correlates.Dissertation Abstracts International, 29 4379B-4380B. (University Microfilms No. 69-6443)
Kendall, P. C., & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Methods in the measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 85–118). New York: Academic Press.
Lohr, J. M., & Bonge, D. (1982). The factorial validity of the Irrational Beliefs Test: A psychometric investigation.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6 225–230.
Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., McLellan, A. T., O'Brien, C. P., & Rosenzweig, J. (1982). Can independent judges recognize different psychotherapies? An experience with manualguided therapies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 49–62.
Meichenbaum, D. H. (1972a). Cognitive modification of test anxious college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39 370–380.
Meichenbaum, D. (1972b).Therapist manual for cognitive behavior modification. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo.
Meichenbaum, D. (1977).Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.
Meichenbaum, D., & Butler, L. (1980). Toward a conceptual model for the treatment of test anxiety: Implications for research and treatment. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–208). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
O'Leary, K. D., & Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems of placebo groups in psychotherapy research.American Psychologist, 33 821–830.
Sarason, I. G. (1978). The Test Anxiety Scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 193–216). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
Simons, A. D., Garfield, S. L., & Murphy, G. E. (1984). The process of change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 41 45–51.
Smith, T. W. (1983). Change in irrational beliefs and the outcome of rational-emotive psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 156–157.
Smith, T. W., & Zurawski, R. M. (1983). Assessment of irrational beliefs: The question of discriminant validity.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29 976–979.
Wonderlic, E. F. (1968).Wonderlic Personnel Test manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Michael Mahoney, Thomas Borkovec, Carol Glass, Linda Craighead, and Walter Weimer for their helpful comments; Jan Cavanaugh for serving as a therapist; and John Baycer, Patty Framo, Cliff Notarius, Ro Nwranski, Andie Smith, and Al Rosenthal for assistance in various aspects of the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnkoff, D.B. A comparison of the coping and restructuring components of cognitive restructuring. Cogn Ther Res 10, 147–158 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173721
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173721