Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the coping and restructuring components of cognitive restructuring

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive restructuring can be thought of as having two goals: a coping goal, in which individuals learn to cope more effectively with a stressful situation using such means as coping self-statements, and a restructuring goal, in which individuals change their beliefs about events, so that formerly stressful situations will no longer be stressful. These two goals were contrasted in a treatment outcome study employing test-anxious subjects who were assigned (a) to a coping treatment, which taught coping self-statements to be used in a test situation, (b) to a restructuring treatment, which involved discussion of general beliefs about evaluation, or (c) to a waiting list control. Outcome measures of test anxiety, irrational beliefs, and thoughts 1 hour before a final exam each showed treatment effects. Though the treated groups did not differ from each other on these measures, the coping group showed more improvement relative to the control group. The results for the two cognitive measures, chosen to reflect the different goals of the two treatments, did not directly correspond to treatment content, suggesting that the change processes resulting from a treatment cannot be predicted from the content of the treatment procedures alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnkoff, D. B. (1983). Common and specific factors in cognitive therapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.),Psychotherapy and patient relationships (pp. 185–215). Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Nelson, T. L. (1983). Beyond the uniformity myth: A comparison of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious college students.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney, D. R. (1980). Self-control approaches to the treatment of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 209–243). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Evans, M. D., & Bemis, K. M. (1982). Can psychotherapies for depression be discriminated? A systematic investigation of cognitive therapy and interpersonal therapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 744–756.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1982). Think cognitively: Selected issues in cognitive assessment and therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 35–71). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., Linehan, M. M., & Smith, J. L. (1978). Reduction of test anxiety through cognitive restructuring.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 32–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Husek, T. R., & Alexander, S. (1963). The effectiveness of the Anxiety Differential in examination stress situations.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. G. (1969). A factored measure of Ellis' irrational belief system, with personality and adjustment correlates.Dissertation Abstracts International, 29 4379B-4380B. (University Microfilms No. 69-6443)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Methods in the measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 85–118). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, J. M., & Bonge, D. (1982). The factorial validity of the Irrational Beliefs Test: A psychometric investigation.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., McLellan, A. T., O'Brien, C. P., & Rosenzweig, J. (1982). Can independent judges recognize different psychotherapies? An experience with manualguided therapies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 49–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. H. (1972a). Cognitive modification of test anxious college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39 370–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1972b).Therapist manual for cognitive behavior modification. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo.

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977).Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Butler, L. (1980). Toward a conceptual model for the treatment of test anxiety: Implications for research and treatment. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–208). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., & Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems of placebo groups in psychotherapy research.American Psychologist, 33 821–830.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G. (1978). The Test Anxiety Scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 193–216). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, A. D., Garfield, S. L., & Murphy, G. E. (1984). The process of change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 41 45–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1983). Change in irrational beliefs and the outcome of rational-emotive psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 156–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Zurawski, R. M. (1983). Assessment of irrational beliefs: The question of discriminant validity.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29 976–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonderlic, E. F. (1968).Wonderlic Personnel Test manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Michael Mahoney, Thomas Borkovec, Carol Glass, Linda Craighead, and Walter Weimer for their helpful comments; Jan Cavanaugh for serving as a therapist; and John Baycer, Patty Framo, Cliff Notarius, Ro Nwranski, Andie Smith, and Al Rosenthal for assistance in various aspects of the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnkoff, D.B. A comparison of the coping and restructuring components of cognitive restructuring. Cogn Ther Res 10, 147–158 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173721

Key words

Navigation