Skip to main content
Log in

Family ties as viewed by child care and treatment personnel in residential settings for children aged 6–14

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines practices with respect to preservation of family ties in residential settings from the viewpoint of the child care and treatment personnel. Interviews were held with 114 staff members at 11 residential schools for children aged 6–14 years. From these it was learned that the programs are characterized by fortuitous connections among the parties involved (the child, his family, the residential treatment personnel and the professionals in the child's home community), non-assumption of responsibility and planning by personnel in the residential setting and in the community, and a gap between the stated policy of encouraging the family ties and the perception of the staff as to how the preservation and strengthening of these ties may be accomplished. The residential setting is not perceived by those interviewed as a center for family involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anglin, J.P. (1985/6). Developing education and support groups for parents of children in residential care.Residential Group Care and Treatment, 3(2), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P. (1988). The future of residential treatment for children. In C.E. Schaefer & J.A. Swanson (Eds.),Children in residential care: Critical issues in treatment (pp. 1–16). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, P. (1985). The children's residential treatment center as a living laboratory for family members: A review of literature and its implications for practice.Child Care Quarterly, 14, 156–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, P. (1988). Implementing a parent involvement/parent education program in a children's residential treatment center.Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 17, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein-Erlich, N. (1981). Family centered group care—the children's institute: From a living center to a center for change. In A. N. Maluccio & P.A. Sinanoglu (Eds.),The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 22–35). New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krona, D.A. (1980). Parents as treatment partners in residential care.Child Welfare, 59, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, E.J. (1987). Family intervention during residential treatment,Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 4, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, Z. (1986). Institutional placement: An interim stage or an end in itself? In Z. Eisikovits & J. Beker (Eds.),Residential group care in community context: Insights from the Israeli experience (pp. 33–50). New York: Haworth Press. (Also inChild & Youth Services, 7(3/4), 33–50.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, Z. (1988).Child-family relationships in residential care (survey). Haifa: University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCroy, W.C. (1984). Residential treatment services: A review of some current trends.Child Care Quarterly, 13, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A.N. (1981). An ecological perspective on practice with parents and children in foster care. In A.N. Maluccio & P. A. Sinanoglu (Eds.),The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 22–35). New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proch, K. & Howard, J. (1984). Parental visiting in foster care: Law and practice.Child Welfare, 63(2), 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, D., & Garland, J. (1987). Residential child care workers as primary agents of family intervention.Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 16(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinanoglu, P.A. (1987). Working with parents: Selected issues and trends as reflected in literature. In A. N. Maluccio & P. A. Sinanoglu (Eds.),The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 3–21). New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hagan, J. (1988). Family work in resident. In C. E. Schaefer & J. A. Swanson (Eds.),Children in residential care: Critical issues in treatment (pp. 134–144). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K. (1981). Family involvement in residential treatment: A support system for parents. In A. N. Maluccio & P. A. Sinanoglu (Eds.),The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 22–35). New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K. (1986). Formal and informal helping in child welfare services: Implications for management and practiceChild Welfare, 65, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laufer, Z. Family ties as viewed by child care and treatment personnel in residential settings for children aged 6–14. Child Youth Care Forum 19, 49–57 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01085554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01085554

Keywords

Navigation