Skip to main content
Log in

Karl Popper and Albert Ellis: Their ideas on psychology and rationality compared

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers leading ideas of Albert Ellis on psychological theory and therapy in relation to ideas of the celebrated philosopher, Karl Popper. The aim is to indicate striking similarities in their views on learning, the genesis of emotional disturbance and, in particular, rationality. Discussion commences with Popper's early, and little studied, work on psychology. His philosophy of science is then surveyed along with the theory of rationality that he analogically extends from it. After tracing the evolution of Ellis' thought, we note the central roles he assigns to irrational thinking in explaining emotional disturbance and to rational thinking in its treatment. Different senses of ‘rationality’ are distinguished in his work, one of them associated with criticism, which provides a most important similarity to Popper's view of rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartley, W. W. (1962).The retreat to commitment. New York, Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, W. & Wettersten, J. (1984).Learning from error. La Salle, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. (1986).Staying rational in an irrational world. Melbourne, McCulloch Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1963).Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York, Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1974). E. Sagarin (Ed.),Humanistic psychotherapy. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. & Harper, R. (1975).A new guide to rational living. North Holly-wood, Wilshire Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1985).Overcoming resistance. New York, Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1984).Darwinian evolution. London, Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1979).Teleology revisited. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hear, A. (1980).Karl Popper. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1966).The open society and its enemies (Vol. 2) (5th ed.). London, Routlege & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972).Conjectures and refutations (4th ed.). London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1974). Intellectual autobiography. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The philosophy of Karl Popper (Book 1) (pp. 1–181). La Salle, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, T. (1971). The rationality of scienceversus the rationality of magic.Philosophy of The Social Sciences, 1, 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D. (1985). Karl Popper and the Jazz Age.Encounter, 65, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

For helpful comments on draft versions of this paper the author is indebted to Barry Butcher.

Drs. Jocelyn Dunphy and Albert Ellis, and an anonymous reviewer for this journal.

Studies of Popper on psychology have only begun to appear in recent years. The most detailed is (Berkson & Wettersten, 1984).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, S. Karl Popper and Albert Ellis: Their ideas on psychology and rationality compared. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther 7, 173–185 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076189

Keywords

Navigation