Skip to main content
Log in

The symbolic implications of vowels and of their orthographic representations in two natural languages

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ninety-two Hebrew-speaking subjects judged the magnitude, brightness, and hardness symbolism of orthographic characters designating five vowel phonemes in Hindi and in Japanese. For both languages and all three symbolic dimensions, the figural symbolism of the orthographic characters was found to replicate very closely the sound symbolism of their phonemic referents. The ranking of the five vowel characters in order of increasing magnitude and decreasing brightness and hardness was as follows:i, e, a, u, o. The results were interpreted to suggest that sound patterns and visual patterns tend to carry cross-culturally consistent connotations, and that the symbolic implications of sounds have been embodied in the pattern of orthographic characters in natural languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley, M., and Varon, E. J. (1933). An accessory study of phonetic-symbolism.Am. J. Psychol. 45: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D., and Erickson, M. (1958). Phonetic-symbolism with respect to three dimensions of the semantic-differential.J. Gen. Psychol. 58: 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1958).Words and Things, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1953).The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1964).A Theory of Data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika.Brit. J. Psychol. 52: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diringer, D. (1968).The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. W. (1935). An experimental study of naming.Am. J. Psychol. 47: 545–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. K., and Wertheimer, M. (1964). Some physiogonomic aspects of naming, or, Maluma and Takete revisited.Percept. Mot. Skills 19: 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. W., and Newland, E. (1940). A genetic study of the naming of visual figures.J. Psychol. 9: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. C. (1967). Magnitude symbolism of English words.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 6: 508–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwosky, T. F., and Odbert, H. S. (1938). Color-music.Psychol. Monogr. 50: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwosky, T. F., Odbert, H. S., and Osgood, C. E. (1942). Studies in synaesthetic thinking. II. The role of forms in visual responses to music.J. Gen. Psychol. 26: 199–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. (1944).The Jadid Hindustani Teacher: Hindustani by a New Method, Qamar Bros., Simala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W. (1947).Gestalt Psychology, Liveright, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J., and Rosenberg, B. G. (1966). Symbolic meaning and color naming.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4: 469–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoveren, M. W. (1920).Colloquial Japanese, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M. S. (1961). A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62: 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism.Am. J. Psychol. 45: 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, P. G., and Yanada, S. (1963).An Introduction to Written Japanese, English Universities Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1959). The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies.Behav. Sci. 5: 146–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, T., and Haga, J. (1963). A study on figural and phonetic symbolism.Psychologica 6: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1929). A study in Phonetic-symbolism.J. Exp. Psychol. 12: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, M., and Lyons, J. (1957). Line drawings and matching responses to words.J. Personal. 25: 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanz, C. (1971). Sound symbolism in words relating to proximity and distance.Lang. Speech 14: 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. K., and Taylor, M. M. (1962). Phonetic symbolism in four unrelated languages.Can. J. Psychol. 16: 344–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. K., and Taylor, M. M. (1965). Another look at phonetic-symbolism.Psychol. Bull. 64: 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1948).Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, International Universities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, F. W. (1968a). Mapping the intersensory regions of perceptual space.Am. J. Psychol. 81: 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, F. W. (1968b). Scaling studies of phonetic symbolism.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 10: 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissemann, H. (1954). Untersuchngen zur Onomotopiie:I Teil, die sprachpsychologischen Versuche. Car. Winter Universitätsverlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Human Development Center, The Hebrew University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koriat, A., Levy, I. The symbolic implications of vowels and of their orthographic representations in two natural languages. J Psycholinguist Res 6, 93–103 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074374

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074374

Keywords

Navigation